Skip to content

feat(reports): leftover-map item complete-case coverage on pair list (v2.42.0) - #816

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
feat/leftover-map-plot-incomplete-item-v2410from
feat/leftover-map-list-item-coverage-v2420
Draft

feat(reports): leftover-map item complete-case coverage on pair list (v2.42.0)#816
seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
feat/leftover-map-plot-incomplete-item-v2410from
feat/leftover-map-list-item-coverage-v2420

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Caption the leftover pair list with persisted leftover-map item complete-case coverage (ADR 0285 / v2.42.0). Missing/invalid coverage omits only that note; valid persisted 0 of M remains visible. Do not infer item coverage from plotted markers, distance, rank, post coverage, or unused axes. UI/read-model only; no SQL or measurement authority.

Current exact ancestry

Exact current parent is #815 c02dffc264f70283ff7ff2d07bfe83a47bd13e10. Current #816 product is 4d81c881469496fedeb8d9bb98cd485209df2089, recreated from workflow-free candidate tree 0ea3fe93c9fb452d4a2053099b409d91aa3e1228 after run 34049855837 completed GREEN. It preserves ADR0285 Proposed, synchronized runtime/package/frontend 2.42.0, and admits only the inherited rank-boundary test from the moved parent. The branch advanced with force=false; isolated convergence GREEN is not hosted exact-product-head GREEN or independent approval.

Descendant authority

#817 is current at aa47c96e15084d0b944558b980edef34133f8040, #818 at de3a61988768bcfddcab1dec3dfe3c60f9a89743, and #819 at f37ca315e3c48fa37bbcafe96e46c5d7dab991b7, each through verified non-force current-parent convergence. #820 is now the earliest stale descendant; run 34054337875 reconstructs its valid singular-value v2.46 delta from exact #819 and repairs its observed integration/governance/release findings. #821 remains dependent with a distinct future ADR/release identity. Do not replay historical convergence commits or transfer predecessor checks/approval.

Keep Draft. Fresh exact-product-head required checks, applicable browser/Storybook/a11y evidence, authenticated acceptance where applicable, and qualifying independent approval remain required. No force-push, destructive rebase, self-approval, gate weakening, or invented measurement values.

…(v2.42.0)

Caption the leftover pair list with persisted leftover-map item
complete-case coverage (ADR 0285). After make seed, closest and
farthest leftover pairs sit above the member list with a pair-list
note that matches leftover-map item complete-case coverage; click a
post marker or a pair button opens that post.

A missing, non-integer, negative-used, non-positive-scored, or
used-greater-than-scored item coverage omits that leftover-map item
coverage note. Coverage 0 of M is shown when that persisted used
count is a non-negative integer. Do not invent item coverage from
plotted criterion marker count, leftover-map distance, leftover-map
rank, leftover-map post coverage, or the count of unused axes. Never
invent a leftover score or a theta. UI-only; no new columns.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Cycle 2026-08-30T21:32 KST: stacked v2.42.0 pair-list item complete-case coverage (ADR 0285) @ 1e3d13e onto #815. Independent APPROVE required before squash. Do not self-approve. Do not squash-merge onto the unprotected leftover base. Copilot/Devin review is not independent APPROVE.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Devin Review

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fresh descendant-convergence finding on exact head 1e3d13ea5fa5744e8c0b9b7b4e8470fceb7630ea: parent #815 has now advanced non-force to c9f864383ebc9222bb3e69008e51b81ce14540cb, preserving ADR 0284 while adding the inherited package-version contract, runtime-identity repair, Pages landing, short-canvas regression, and Vietnamese explained-share RED. This child still points at predecessor #815 63092ded… and independently declares v2.42.0 while runtime lineageweave.__version__ remains v2.20.0. The parent repair paths are disjoint from the ADR 0285/pair-list delta except release identity. Preserve the child product delta, adopt the parent contracts non-force, require the package-version test as RED, align runtime provenance to v2.42.0, and join the repaired child to current #815 as a second parent. Keep the inherited Vietnamese RED; do not transfer predecessor GREEN or flatten either tree.

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.

  • Head SHA: 326a2f016f7bbf1f01bffdffa8b96a9b1451b6c0

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fresh stack-authority finding: the PR body still describes this successor as stacked on #815@63092de…, but live #815 is now c9f864383ebc9222bb3e69008e51b81ce14540cb and this PR itself has advanced non-force to 326a2f016f7bbf1f01bffdffa8b96a9b1451b6c0. The inherited Vietnamese explained-share RED remains unresolved upstream, so the predecessor 311-test/oxlint evidence must not be promoted to this exact head. Preserve ADR 0285 and the pair-list item-coverage delta, keep Draft, and refresh the PR's current stack/evidence boundary.

seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2026
Preserve both the repaired #816 parent lineage and #817 ADR 0286/product delta with a normal two-parent merge. No force-push, rebase, or product-authority change.

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Root release-identity finding on current 7e8653d89c77c3cb6771dcf592517baf691eeebc: #815 is the last inspected predecessor whose package/runtime identity is still coherently v2.41.0. This v2.42.0 child bumps pyproject.toml/frontend release identity but leaves lineageweave.__version__ = "2.41.0", so the long runtime-version drift seen later is introduced here. Preserve the item-coverage delta, but when the #813#814#815 parent convergence reaches this branch, add a realistic package-version RED and synchronize runtime identity to 2.42.0 before reconstructing later release descendants. Do not patch v2.60 only in #840 and call the ancestry repaired; each successor must carry its own release identity on reconstruction.

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additional governance finding on current 7e8653d89c77c3cb6771dcf592517baf691eeebc: ADR 0285 is also Accepted while #816 remains Draft. When repaired ancestry reaches this branch, the same reconstruction must preserve the item-coverage delta, set ADR 0285 to Proposed, and synchronize runtime identity to v2.42.0. Treat those as one current-head candidate repair; do not separately fork governance and version truth.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant