Repository navigation
Conversation
…resource-snapshots-20260908
This was referenced Sep 16, 2026
This was referenced Sep 16, 2026
6 tasks done
Collaborator
|
Thanks for this contribution. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this matters
Resource consumers focused on a few services should not need disk scans or receive unrelated totals for a lightweight CPU/RAM snapshot.
Feature and overlap check
Add authenticated repeated service filters (max50) and include_disk=false. Filter a complete shared snapshot without narrowing the cached data; report scoped totals and explicit null disk totals when disk is omitted. Validate malformed/unknown IDs. Updated the original PR onto beta. Searched all-state resource scope and resources.py PRs: #4966 shares concurrent collection, #5069 adds auxiliary containers, #5180 handles permission errors and #5469 nullable metrics. None supplies scoped/optional-disk reads.
Validation
Linux Python3.11:
pytest -q tests/test_resource_scopes.py tests/test_resources.py tests/test_auxiliary_container_resources.py: 29 passed. Authenticated HTTP tests cover scope, cache isolation, no disk collector for CPU/RAM-only calls, later full reads, bad filters and authentication. Focused pre-commit/diff check passed. No live Docker/disk scan claim. Baseline smoke/simulation passed; known full-gate/BATS failures remain.Rollback
Defaults preserve full snapshots and totals; filters do not mutate caches. No persisted state. Revert removes query features; default clients continue to work. Ready for independent review.
Final beta-batch receipt — 2026-09-16
Candidate:
f24f8eea01c951b82fab58bef02fd270d8ef6725. GitHub check audit at 11:07:47 UTC: 37 successful, 4 skipped, 0 failed, 0 pending, matching this exact head; OPEN, public-beta base, Ready (not Draft). Skipped checks are not counted as passed tests.The combined integration head,
5b9877184ceab0751c6c9fe3564c73303e78f0a3, contains all 30 exact candidate heads on public-beta3c186f3f12ba21dad7b7266ec5449393529abb00. At this exact final SHA: full dashboard 171 files / 1,274 tests passed; full dashboard API 3,124 passed, 2 skipped; advice boundary suite 23 passed; Bark request/legacy-empty cases 9 passed; changed-file secret/key/size hooks and diff check passed. Shell-only hooks had no matching changed files.Additional combined checks ran at predecessor
28adf1aa5c0710d3c0de13df7870629e24977fec: Token Spy 130 passed, 1 skipped; CLI contracts 16 passed; real backup/restore round trip passed; Open Interpreter HTTP/runner cases 4 passed;make lint smoke simulate, frontend lint (zero errors, 624 warnings) and production build passed. The only final-head differences are two test files (advice dialog fixtures and Bark's empty-text expectation); production files are identical. These results are not live GPU/model or service rollout qualification.Qualified merge order: #5490 → #5494 → #5495 → #3848 → #3846 → #3845 → #3844 → #3843 → #3841 → #3838 → #3837 → #3836 → #3835 → #3834 → #3809 → #3808 → #3807 → #3806 → #3804 → #3803 → #3802 → #3801 → #3800 → #3712 → #3711 → #3710 → #3709 → #3708 → #3852 → #3849. Branches are independently useful. Shared-file merging required only preserving the union of four adjacent Makefile registrations: provider-probe redirects, healthcheck error-body, Milvus persistence and healthcheck latency. Production code in these 30 merged without manual conflict resolution. External advice/Bark overlaps have separate pairwise receipts in #5494/#3808. Recheck the combined tree if other shared-file PRs land first; do not drop test registrations.
Full release qualification remains not green: baseline
make gatefails a no-sudo Docker fallback fixture; 5 of 428 BATS cases fail in this environment; all-files private-key scanning flags two pre-existing dummy-key fixtures. No checks were disabled. CI success and Ready status do not replace independent human review, especially for auth backups and Milvus data migration. No upstream merge or deployment was performed.