Skip to content

feat(zotero): add snapshot-bound steward worksheet - #25

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 28 commits into
autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluationfrom
autoresearch/zotero-steward-review-worksheet
Draft

feat(zotero): add snapshot-bound steward worksheet#25
seonghobae wants to merge 28 commits into
autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluationfrom
autoresearch/zotero-steward-review-worksheet

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Latest worksheet source-scope checkpoint

Exact head 51631fbf711b403a40f3b9fafa2ec3958d54ceaf normally retains previous PR25 c6b4c17e931951a2e1d4ea79ac79363f6306a5bf and parent PR24 35c57ca4510a65cf48069285d78b95cf47db65ba. Base remains autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluation.

RED 900038e compiled4pass2fail: source inventory omission and hidden pending scope admitted. 5b54d06 reuses the complete report validator, deleting54 duplicate lines while preserving valid unresolved source preparation. RED 30aa091 compiled6pass2fail: changed metadata yields equal worksheet and missing binding deserializes. Final source 97046c7 requires existing v2 proposal_digest; source/context identity changes and missing-field rejection tested. Blank decisions preserved; no actual labels or approval issued.

Final local evidence:158tests24suitesincluding3doctests; strictClippy/rustdoc/fmt/CI/diff and unchanged pinnedcoverage282functions2468normalizedregions414normalizedbranches pass. Raw3232/3293lines4858/4960regions369/414branches NOT100%. Logs /tmp/conceptweave-pr25-{source-red,binding-red,final,clippy-final,rustdoc-final,coverage-final}.log. Independent read-only review no additional production finding. PRD/TRD/ProposedADR0006/Gap updated.

Keep OPEN Draft. Later progress/patch/finalization consumers must compare worksheet/report proposal identity before governance; reject blank or rewritten bindings, regenerate old worksheets without backfill. Root has not adopted repair. Actual decisions/approvals0/3715 plus4unresolvedsources, noZoterowrite/protectedmerge/release. Visual Inspection retried but Maclocked. Local evidence is not hosted GREEN or protected approval. Next PR26 export pair must preserve these scope boundaries. Earlier checkpoints below are retained history.

Latest bounded-read integration checkpoint

Exact head c6b4c17e931951a2e1d4ea79ac79363f6306a5bf normally merges parent 1e73e1545de32ae9a349c469a7794c5c3fc2ae9b while retaining previous child 6af51119f434035c9e8fc2743e8327c0199a8c92. Base remains autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluation. The #9 whole-snapshot elapsed-time repair and its RED/GREEN evidence are inherited without reverse-merging later features or discarding predecessor deltas.

This exact head passes Rust 1.98.0 locked workspace tests=126 suites=24, including doctests and excluding filtered subprocess duplicates, strict all-target Clippy, warnings-denied rustdoc, formatting, the existing CI contract and diff checks. Log: /private/tmp/conceptweave-deadline-pr25-20260906.log. Intermediate coverage is not inferred from owner/final-endpoint coverage. No new dependency, actual paper read/decision, Zotero mutation or authority issuer was used.

Draft and protected prerequisites remain. Local tests are not hosted GREEN, independent approval, merged/released source or evidence for another head. Earlier checkpoints below are retained history, not the current head.

Verified local approval-order repair — 2026-09-06 checkpoint

Exact head: autoresearch/zotero-steward-review-worksheet@6af51119f434035c9e8fc2743e8327c0199a8c92. Exact base: autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluation@ba3a691bb246258d2a27bc83c308be21031e310e.

Original planner owner #13 preserves regression 505e111c993d8269e5b7b9e17a25a5ce20f8606e and repair 8a684882005085d8b3cb47812e185975084e0475. Every existing local request/mode/item/metadata check finishes before the external approval verifier. Invalid requests invoke it zero times; valid complete requests invoke it exactly once. Local validation errors intentionally precede approval denial. Deterministic operations and complete before/after/rollback metadata are unchanged.

This exact head passed locked Rust 1.98.0 workspace tests (123 tests / 24 unfiltered suites, doctests included), strict all-target Clippy, formatting, warnings-denied rustdoc, CI contract and diff checks before normal push. Normal parent integration retains both the prior child and verified parent as ancestors. Coverage from another stack head is not attributed to this head.

Keep Draft behind the existing prerequisite stack. This is local verification, not hosted current-head GREEN, independent approval, protected merge or release. No later full-text feature was reverse-merged into an earlier owner. Full-text-aware write admission, authentic decisions and independent authority remain separate gaps; no real Zotero/model request, label, approval or write was performed for this repair.

Earlier coordinates and status claims below are historical.

Prior PR description, retained without discarding evidence

Current source-integrity note — 2026-09-05

  • Exact head: autoresearch/zotero-steward-review-worksheet@b92bc57bccd97612ddf7f8851c9b98fc3c683eed.
  • Exact base: autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluation@68e3186f3638fbc7f111ed4c91a99dbe87ccf48a.
  • This head inherits PR feat(research): add steward golden-set evaluation #10 root e7d4e59f1b55b5954c5f8436527bc96e7ef2fb13 through ordinary merge ancestry. The source-snapshot digest binds complete captured raw provider JSON and the actual typed classifier inputs; source evidence and derived proposals retain separate identities.
  • GoldenSetApproval.proposal_digest is required and binds the complete proposal records used for evaluation. The current proposal digest is checked before the caller-owned governance verifier. Do not backfill old receipts: regenerate evidence and obtain a new approval bound to the reviewed evidence.
  • Keep Draft. This note does not claim current exact-head hosted GREEN, independent approval, protected merge, live Zotero mutation, or governed publication. Root, predecessor, and terminal-stack local test evidence is not transferred as per-PR hosted evidence.

Earlier heads, runtime snapshots, campaign counts, and verification statements below are historical notes, not current acceptance evidence.

Historical PR notes — original text retained

Outcome

Derive one blank steward decision for every bibliographic proposal, bind the worksheet to the exact library/rule/digest/complete item revisions, reject contradictory/incomplete-provenance/failed reports before review, and omit duplicated titles, abstracts, tags, collections and rule evidence.

Current exact stack — 2026-09-05

  • base: complete-review evaluation feat(zotero): prove complete steward review coverage #24 autoresearch/zotero-complete-review-evaluation@005826d069940d7cbf89028ee36ea14ef4a339dd;
  • exact head: 8a239eefb7a28aa12558f794ba01a6d8f7353132;
  • Draft/open/mergeable; non-force successor preserving worksheet semantics while adopting current feat(zotero): prove complete steward review coverage #24/Foundation ancestry;
  • previously recorded workspace/Clippy/CI/coverage and independent-review evidence is retained as lineage evidence, not transferred as exact-head hosted GREEN for 8a239ee....

Boundary

The worksheet starts with every steward decision blank. The last local campaign had 3,715 proposals, but live reviewed completion remains 0/3,715 until a steward supplies decisions and Governance verifies the approval. This PR performs no Zotero mutation and does not create publication authority.

Keep Draft behind #24 and the complete predecessor stack. Require one unchanged exact head with terminal Product/security/SAST/dependency/review evidence before integration.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.


Your included review limit is currently reached under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. This review may still proceed through usage-based billing if eligible. Your next included review will be available in 37 minutes.

Non-force restack PR #25 onto PR #24 current head. Preserve snapshot-bound worksheet semantics while carrying current predecessor receipt RED contracts and inherited security boundary through ancestry; no predecessor GREEN is claimed.
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2026
Non-force restack PR #26 onto PR #25 current head. Preserve one-snapshot artifact-pair semantics while carrying current predecessor receipt RED contracts and inherited security boundary through ancestry; no predecessor GREEN is claimed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Current-stack correction (2026-09-05): exact base #24 7d6813d80908bfd85f61048aab960634f4eeb72b; exact head b2de999fbdc3832856be585995f31e915b44faf3. Snapshot-bound steward worksheet semantics are preserved by non-force restack; approved-label completion remains independent of deterministic worksheet creation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant