docs(security): plan the next hardening waves - #334
Draft
BitHighlander wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
developbaseline21d6a9d100b16566a1e48899abbbb7bab9366187Why anti-rollback is an RFC, not an application patch
An application-only version check would be mutable by the older signed image it is meant to reject. The floor must be enforced by the bootloader and backed by irreversible state. The STM32 OTP source assignments do not prove that an apparently unused block was never programmed by factory tooling, so this RFC requires a manufacturing audit before reserving a block.
Review decisions requested
Validation
Documentation-only change; Markdown and whitespace checks pass.
Related work