Skip to content

tests, ci: honor Windows VTMP and remove temporary diagnostics - #32197

Merged
medvednikov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/fix-ci-aebadc37-followup
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

medvednikov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/fix-ci-aebadc37-followup

Conversation

@medvednikov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

#32194 merged while its last fixture adjustment and diagnostic cleanup were being finalized. This follow-up contains only those two remaining changes.

Changes

  • Make Windows tool-cache fixtures use os.vtmp_dir() with the shortened vtc_... directory name, so they honor the short VTMP already configured by Windows CI. The earlier version used os.temp_dir(), ignoring that setting and placing nested MSVC output beneath the longer user temporary directory.
  • Remove the temporary ci_regressions.yml diagnostic workflow, preserving the repository's existing long-term CI trigger policy.

The diagnostic run passed the new generic regression with TCC/MSVC, all six assignment-review tests, and the original manifest-staging case. Two other tool-cache cases failed while MSVC generated atomic_ops.c intermediate output (C1083, invalid argument). Respecting VTMP corrects the fixture's temp-root selection; native confirmation of those two cases remains outstanding.

The HTTP/2 diagnostic's trace option exposed an unrelated module-initialization-retention problem and did not reproduce the original stall. No tracing or HTTP runtime behavior is changed here.

Validation

Further tests were explicitly skipped as requested. The one-line VTMP adjustment has not been rerun. Completed validation and remaining findings are recorded in #32194 and the companion VTL PR.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-11T05:13:30.394494Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
7538048 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant