Skip to content

spectralbranding/orgschema-papers

Repository files navigation

Organizational Schema Theory -- Research Papers

Research publications on Organizational Schema Theory (orgschema), a reverse-design TDD methodology for business operations. Businesses are designed backward from desired customer experience through testable, version-controlled specifications where each operational layer validates the layer above it.

Papers

Paper Words Refs Status
The Organizational Schema Theory: Test-Driven Business Design ~8,300 25 Working paper v1.3.0, Apr 2026 — DOI
The OrgSchema Audit: A Six-Level Diagnostic for Specification-Driven Organizations ~9,200 24 Working paper v1.0.0, Apr 2026 — DOI
Verification as Operator: Why Acceptance Testing Succeeds Where Conventional Audit Fails ~6,100 31 Preprint v1.1.0, May 2026 — DOI
Organizational Metamerism: When Distinct Configurations Produce Equivalent Outputs ~10,300 48 Preprint v1.1.0, May 2026 — DOI
A Six-Tier Ontology of Acquisition-Target Transferability: Dual Hierarchies and Failure-Propagation Mechanisms ~12,500 53 Preprint v1.1.0 on Zenodo, May 2026 — DOI
Brand as Tier-4 Projection: A Multi-Brand and Recovery Theory of the Six-Tier Business Architecture ~9,300 60 Preprint v1.1.0 on Zenodo, May 2026 — DOI
The Tier-Rotation Curve: A Theory of Brand-Substrate Decoupling and Its M&A-Value Geometry ~13,200 48 Preprint v1.0.0 on Zenodo, May 2026 — DOI
Where to Invest Within the Firm: Organizational Tiers, Discount Rates, and Long-Run Firm Value ~13,000 62 Preprint v1.0.0 on Zenodo 2026-05-07 — DOI

The Tier-Rotation Curve (Zharnikov 2026ai)

Formalizes brand-substrate decoupling as a continuous, logistic-form model governing how brand signal migrates from a founder-bound substrate (Tier 1) to an institutionally separable product-brand substrate (Tier 4) through deliberate knowledge-externalization effort over time. M&A value at exit is derived as a piecewise function of Tier-4 share at deal time, with a separability threshold above which brand assets become acquirable independently of the originating principal. Extends the Tier-Rotation Valuation Dynamics subsection of Zharnikov (2026ah) into a complete continuous model. Five falsifiable propositions; four illustrative boundary objects (Yeezy/Adidas, Casamigos/Diageo, Tom Ford/Estée Lauder, Kongō Gumi).

Keywords: brand assets, founder exit, intangible-asset separability, M&A valuation, organizational architecture, resource separability, tier rotation

  • Read on GitHub
  • Preprint (DOI)
  • Target venue: Academy of Management Review (primary); Strategic Management Journal + Organization Science (alternates)

Where to Invest Within the Firm (Zharnikov 2026aj)

Formalizes the cross-tier capital allocation problem using a vector w spanning five operating tiers that differ in asset durability. Each tier accumulates stock with tier-specific decay rates calibrated from Belo, Lin, and Vitorino (2014), ranging from .50/year at the organizational surface (Tier 6: advertising, paid media) to .05-.10/year at foundational layers (Tiers 2-3). Long-run value is a discounted Cobb-Douglas aggregator with Jorgensonian user costs; optimizing subject to the per-tier rental-rate budget constraint yields the closed-form rule w_t*(r) = alpha_t / (delta_t + r) and the comparative static d(w_6*)/dr > 0. Four falsifiable propositions link pre-deal surface-tier intensity, governance horizon, cost-of-capital shocks, and capability-rotation stage to M&A outcomes and capability persistence. Companion computation script and Figure 1 contour plot published alongside the paper.

Keywords: capital allocation, dynamic capabilities, brand capital, goodwill impairment, portfolio choice, organizational architecture, tier allocation, intangible capital, resource orchestration, corporate governance

  • Read on GitHub
  • Preprint (DOI)
  • Target venue: Strategic Management Journal (primary); Academy of Management Review and Organization Science (alternates)

Brand as Tier-4 Projection (Zharnikov 2026ah)

Extends the six-tier business architecture from Zharnikov (2026ag) into the brand-portfolio domain. Argues that brand IS Tier 4 — the Product specification surface — projected through an observer perceptual filter into observed brand-perception space. Three downstream phenomena unify under this single structural identity: multi-brand capacity is the firm's tier-level separability profile; failed-brand recovery is tier-level salvage of brand-agnostic infrastructure under brand-bound failure; and marketing, advertising, and branding are Tier-6 organizational functions that create, operate, and retire Tier-4 instances. Seven falsifiable propositions are derived (P1-P7), including the operationalization of the Aaker-Joachimsthaler Brand Relationship Spectrum as a measurable Tier-3-visibility-in-Tier-4 parameter (P7). Two diagnostic instruments — the Multi-Brand Capacity Diagnostic and the Recovery Salvage Matrix — are sketched for empirical validation.

Keywords: brand portfolio architecture, multi-brand strategy, corporate rebranding, brand failure recovery, tier-level decomposition, brand-business separability, marketing organization, cross-brand function

A Six-Tier Ontology of Acquisition-Target Transferability (Zharnikov 2026ag)

Develops a six-tier ontology of the acquisition target — Owner Intent, Business Model, Business Entity, Product, Process, and Organization — each defined by a unique governor, specification surface, and transferability mode. The tiers form dual overlapping hierarchies (service running upward; constraint running downward) that jointly determine integration sequencing and generate seven falsifiable propositions on cross-tier failure cascades. The framework applies across for-profit, NGO, cooperative, and state-owned organizational forms through explicit substitution rules. The Six-Tier Separability Diagnostic (STSD) profiles each tier as Fused / Partial / Independent for pre-close M&A risk assessment. Bridge contribution: the OST cascade L0-L5 nests inside Tiers 4-6 of the broader six-tier ontology.

Keywords: mergers and acquisitions, organizational ontology, transferability, business model, integration failure, form-invariance, separability diagnostic, dual hierarchy, failure cascade

The Organizational Schema Theory (Zharnikov 2026c)

Introduces the orgschema methodology: a six-level TDD cascade (customer experience contracts, signal requirements, process contracts, procedures, input specifications, sourcing requirements) where each level functions as the acceptance test for the level below it. Demonstrated through a complete specialty coffee operation (Spectra Coffee) specified across all six levels. Evaluated by five independent expert reviewers. Discusses implications for franchise models, organizational openness, and cross-industry perception transplant.

Keywords: test-driven development, business design, configuration management, design science research, declarative process management, organizational specification

Verification as Operator (Zharnikov 2026ae)

Provides the first explicit algebraic identification of organizational acceptance testing as a spectral projection operator. Conventional audit (per Power 1997) is shown to be a degenerate rank-1 projection that discards all dimensions of organizational performance orthogonal to the compliance axis; OST's six-level cascade is full-rank, preserving dimensional structure across the specification hierarchy. The paper synthesizes three convergent lineages — organizational cybernetics (Beer 1972; Beer 1984), behavioral organization theory (March and Simon 1958; Argyris and Schön 1978), and software engineering verification (Beck 2002) — and shows that all three implicitly rely on the projection identity without naming it. Three formal propositions establish the rank inequality, cascade-consistency condition, and bandwidth bound. A Python simulation in Appendix B confirms that rank-1 audit misses ~90% of total organizational deviation across all noise levels.

Keywords: organizational verification, spectral projection, acceptance testing, audit society, viable system model, test-driven development, organizational learning, information-processing design

The OrgSchema Audit (Zharnikov 2026)

Introduces a structured diagnostic protocol that evaluates organizational specification maturity across six cascading levels. Each audit level defines what to examine, what a healthy specification looks like, what failure modes indicate, and what corrective actions restore specification integrity. Demonstrates the full protocol through a worked example using a specialty coffee operation. Advances two propositions: cascade-position prioritization and bidirectional traceability completeness.

Keywords: organizational specification, test-driven business design, operational audit, specification maturity, six-level cascade, experience contracts, organizational schema theory, AI-assisted diagnostics

How to Cite

@article{zharnikov2026ost,
  title={The Organizational Schema Theory: Test-Driven Business Design},
  author={Zharnikov, Dmitry},
  year={2026},
  url={https://github.com/spectralbranding/orgschema-papers}
}

Machine-readable citation: CITATION.cff

Companion Repositories

Repository Description
orgschema-framework Python validator + JSON Schema for orgschema specifications
orgschema-demo Spectra Coffee reference implementation -- 25 YAML files, CI/CD pipeline
sbt-framework Spectral Brand Theory -- the perception specification language used for L0-L1
sbt-papers SBT research papers (sibling framework)

Related Work

Orgschema is a sibling framework to Spectral Brand Theory (SBT). Both emerge from specification-first epistemology but target different domains:

  • SBT models how brands are perceived (observer-dependent, 8 dimensions)
  • Orgschema uses SBT as the test specification language for L0-L1 (desired perception determines required signals)

See Zharnikov 2026a for the SBT paper.

Cross-Cutting Methodology Papers (in sbt-papers)

Several papers in the sbt-papers repo are cross-cutting methodology pieces that apply equally to SBT, Orgschema, and the broader specification-first research program. They live in sbt-papers for historical reasons (originated there before the orgschema-papers split) but are conceptually shared between the two frameworks:

Key Paper DOI Relevance to Orgschema
R13 Paper as Specification: A Machine-Readable Standard for Scientific Claims 10.5281/zenodo.19210037 Applies the orgschema test-driven cascade pattern to scientific publishing — papers as testable specifications.
R14 Research as Repository: A Git-Native Protocol for Scientific Knowledge Production 10.5281/zenodo.19294864 Extends orgschema's "git as system of record" architecture to scientific knowledge production.
2026l The Rendering Problem: From Genetic Expression to Brand Perception 10.5281/zenodo.19064426 Cross-domain formalization of the specification-rendering gap that orgschema's L1-L5 cascade addresses operationally.

These papers' Zenodo DOIs and GitHub paths remain in sbt-papers; this repo points to them rather than duplicating.

Author

Dmitry Zharnikov -- dmitry@spectralbranding.com

Creator of Organizational Schema Theory and Spectral Brand Theory. Background in financial systems engineering and applied epistemology.

License

All papers are released under MIT License. Use, cite, and build upon this work freely with attribution.

Trademarks

"Organizational Schema Theory" and "orgschema" are trademarks of Dmitry Zharnikov. The MIT license applies to the source code and text only and does not grant permission to use the project trademarks.

About

Research papers on Organizational Schema Theory: a specification-first methodology for business operations, with bidirectional traceability, continuous certification, and observer-agnostic design. Mathematical foundations, empirical studies, and methodology papers.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages