Skip to content

Rollup of 12 pull requests#155745

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 28 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-D6OSAOt
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

Rollup of 12 pull requests#155745
rust-bors[bot] merged 28 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-D6OSAOt

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

taiki-e and others added 28 commits March 7, 2026 21:53
…own-linux-gnueabihf

Add SanitizerSet::ADDRESS to the supported_sanitizers for the
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf targets.

The AddressSanitizer is already enabled on the armv7-linux-androideabi
platform, which shares the same ARM architecture. There is no reason
these Linux GNU targets should not also support it, as the underlying
LLVM support for ASan on 32-bit ARM is already in place.
Add a regression test for RUST-150898 to make users aware that if this
test fails, they may encounter unusual behavior elsewhere.

Original repro authored by dianqk.
So we do not need to disambiguate considering parents
…, r=notriddle,lolbinarycat

Refactor out common code into a `IndexItem::new` constructor

rust-lang#149404
… r=chenyukang

Document #[diagnostic::on_move] in the unstable book.

Also adds the attribute on `std::fs::File` to stay consistent with the prose in the unstable book entry.

cc @estebank @rperier

Rendered:
<img width="791" height="903" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a27a5211-7717-4f7f-a514-8316dccc78d5" />
<img width="779" height="390" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a983108d-575e-4551-ab14-28611344e9b0" />
…-rename, r=petrochenkov

delegation: rename `Self` generic param to `This` in recursive delegations

This PR supports renaming of `Self` generic parameter to `This` in recursive delegations scenario, this allows propagation of `This` as we rely on `Self` naming to check whether it is implicit Self of a trait. Comment with a bit deeper explanation is in `uplift_delegation_generic_params`. Part of rust-lang#118212.

r? @petrochenkov
Some cleanups around per parent disambiguators

r? @petrochenkov

follow-up to rust-lang#155547

The two remaining uses are

* resolve_bound_vars, where it is a reasonable way to do it instead of having another field in the visitor that needs to get scoped (set & reset) every time we visit an opaque type. May still change that at some point, but it's not really an issue
* `create_def` in the resolver: will get removed together with my other refactorings for `node_id_to_def_id` (making that per-owner)
…iser

rustc_codegen_ssa: Define ELF flag value for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

Currently, attempting to build this target using Ubuntu/Debian's sparc64-multilib toolchain results in the following link error ([full log](https://github.com/taiki-e/atomic-maybe-uninit/actions/runs/22798868888/job/66137493862#step:15:442)):

```
  = note: /usr/lib/gcc-cross/sparc64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../sparc64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: unknown architecture of input file `/home/runner/work/atomic-maybe-uninit/atomic-maybe-uninit/target/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/rustcYzaDYW/symbols.o' is incompatible with sparc:v8plus output
```

This appears to be caused by the required e_flag being missing and can be fixed by setting `EF_SPARC_32PLUS`.

Tested using rustc with this patch applied and qemu-user (taiki-e/atomic-maybe-uninit@57d7e7f, [log](https://github.com/taiki-e/atomic-maybe-uninit/actions/runs/22798793270/job/66137298093)).

Related discussion: rust-lang#131222 (comment)

r? workingjubilee
cc @glaubitz

@rustbot label +O-SPARC
…w-suggestion-v2, r=JohnTitor

Do not suggest borrowing enclosing calls for nested where-clause obligations

In rust-lang#155088, the compiler was blaming the whole call expr instead of the value that  actually failed the trait bound, so for foo(&[String::from("a")]) it was suggesting stuff like &foo(...). I changed the suggestion logic so it only emits borrow help if the expr it found actually matches the failed self type,  and used the same check for the “similar impl exists” help too. So now the compiler should give the normal error + required bound note.

Fix rust-lang#155088
…inarycat

rustdoc: Fix Managarm C Library name in cfg pretty printer

Like rust-lang#155293, this was introduced in rust-lang#154328.

Unlike that PR, I don't think there's any need to backport, because this cfg is not used anywhere in the standard library.
(I searched for `"mlibc"`, the only place it's used in rust-lang/rust is the HTML doc test.)

#### Other Minor Fixes

Remove a FIXME comment in the pretty printer, `os = "none"` is always bare metal:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d227e48c560e915fe7c0b8b3e821680a3a0ba739/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/mod.rs#L3179

Fix a comment typo, ignore another typo in vendored sources.
Enable AddressSanitizer on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

Add SanitizerSet::ADDRESS to the supported_sanitizers for the arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf targets.

The AddressSanitizer is already enabled on the armv7-linux-androideabi platform, which shares the same ARM architecture. There is no reason these Linux GNU targets should not also support it, as the underlying LLVM support for ASan on 32-bit ARM is already in place.
…=dianqk

test: Add a regression test for Apple platforms aborting on `free`

Add a regression test for rust-lang#150898 to make users aware that if this test failures, they may encounter unusual behavior elsewhere.
…c, r=wesleywiser

Fix tier level for 5 thumb bare-metal ARM targets

The spec files for 5 Thumb-mode bare-metal ARM targets incorrectly set tier: Some(2), while the documentation correctly lists them as Tier 3. This mismatch was introduced in PR rust-lang#150556 — the intent was Tier 2 eventually, but these targets should sit at Tier 3 until a proper Tier 3 → Tier 2 promotion MCP is submitted and approved.

This PR changes tier: Some(2) → Some(3) in the following spec files, making them consistent with the docs:

thumbv7a-none-eabi
thumbv7a-none-eabihf
thumbv7r-none-eabi
thumbv7r-none-eabihf
thumbv8r-none-eabihf

PS: No doc changes needed — they already correctly state Tier 3.

r?
…typo, r=wesleywiser

Fix typo by removing extra 'to'

Fixes rust-lang#155695

Fix a typo in the `std::convert` module documentation by removing an extra "to" in the module-level docs.
…chenkov

Remove `AllVariants` workaround for rust-analyzer

Part of rust-lang#155677

Removes the `ALL_VARIANTS` alias added to work around rust-analyzer not supporting `#![feature(macro_derive)]`, which has since been fixed (rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/21043).
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Apr 24, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 24, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Apr 24, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

📌 Commit 2a885bb has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 24, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #149452 (Refactor out common code into a `IndexItem::new` constructor)
 - #155621 (Document #[diagnostic::on_move] in the unstable book.)
 - #155635 (delegation: rename `Self` generic param to `This` in recursive delegations)
 - #155730 (Some cleanups around per parent disambiguators)
 - #153537 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Define ELF flag value for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu)
 - #155219 (Do not suggest borrowing enclosing calls for nested where-clause obligations)
 - #155408 (rustdoc: Fix Managarm C Library name in cfg pretty printer)
 - #155571 (Enable AddressSanitizer on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)
 - #155713 (test: Add a regression test for Apple platforms aborting on `free`)
 - #155723 (Fix tier level for 5 thumb bare-metal ARM targets)
 - #155735 (Fix typo by removing extra 'to')
 - #155736 (Remove `AllVariants` workaround for rust-analyzer)
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 24, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

💔 Test for cfaac75 failed: CI. Failed job:

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The job dist-x86_64-illumos failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[222/3898] Building CXX object lib/CAS/CMakeFiles/LLVMCAS.dir/BuiltinUnifiedCASDatabases.cpp.o
[223/3898] Building CXX object lib/CAS/CMakeFiles/LLVMCAS.dir/InMemoryCAS.cpp.o
[224/3898] Building CXX object lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o
FAILED: lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o 
sccache /usr/bin/c++ -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Demangle -I/checkout/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Demangle -Iinclude -I/checkout/src/llvm-project/llvm/include -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fPIC -m64 -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -w -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -DNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -std=c++1z -MD -MT lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o -MF lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o.d -o lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o -c /checkout/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Demangle/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp
sccache: error: Timed out waiting for server startup. Maybe the remote service is unreachable?
Run with SCCACHE_LOG=debug SCCACHE_NO_DAEMON=1 to get more information
[225/3898] Building CXX object lib/CAS/CMakeFiles/LLVMCAS.dir/MappedFileRegionArena.cpp.o
[226/3898] Building CXX object lib/CAS/CMakeFiles/LLVMCAS.dir/ObjectStore.cpp.o
[227/3898] Building CXX object lib/CAS/CMakeFiles/LLVMCAS.dir/OnDiskCAS.cpp.o
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

---
   0: __rustc::rust_begin_unwind
             at /rustc/ef0fb8a2563200e322fa4419f09f65a63742038c/library/std/src/panicking.rs:689:5
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
             at /rustc/ef0fb8a2563200e322fa4419f09f65a63742038c/library/core/src/panicking.rs:80:14
   2: cmake::fail
   3: cmake::run
   4: <cmake::Config>::build
   5: <bootstrap::core::build_steps::llvm::Llvm as bootstrap::core::builder::Step>::run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/llvm.rs:553:13
   6: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::ensure::<bootstrap::core::build_steps::llvm::Llvm>
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1579:36
   7: <bootstrap::core::build_steps::llvm::Llvm as bootstrap::core::builder::Step>::run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/llvm.rs:500:25
---
  11: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::compiler
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1149:14
  12: <bootstrap::core::build_steps::dist::Rustc as bootstrap::core::builder::Step>::make_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/dist.rs:495:42
  13: <bootstrap::core::builder::StepDescription>::maybe_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:476:13
  14: bootstrap::core::builder::cli_paths::match_paths_to_steps_and_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/cli_paths.rs:141:22
  15: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::run_step_descriptions
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1122:9
  16: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::execute_cli
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1101:14
  17: <bootstrap::Build>::build
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/lib.rs:799:25
  18: bootstrap::main
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/bin/main.rs:130:11
  19: <fn() as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
             at /rustc/ef0fb8a2563200e322fa4419f09f65a63742038c/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Probably spurious?
@bors retry

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 24, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 24, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: JonathanBrouwer
Duration: 3h 15m 31s
Pushing 7c61a35 to main...

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot merged commit 7c61a35 into rust-lang:main Apr 24, 2026
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.97.0 milestone Apr 24, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing acb65f3 (parent) -> 7c61a35 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 324 test diffs

Stage 1

  • [pretty] tests/pretty/delegation-self-rename.rs: [missing] -> pass (J2)
  • [ui] tests/ui/allocator/regression-abort-on-free-issue-150898.rs: [missing] -> ignore (only executed when the target is aarch64-apple-darwin) (J2)
  • [ui] tests/ui/delegation/generics/self-rename.rs: [missing] -> pass (J2)
  • [ui] tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/on_move/std_impls.rs: [missing] -> pass (J2)
  • [ui] tests/ui/suggestions/dont-suggest-borrow-whole-call-issue-155088.rs: [missing] -> pass (J2)

Stage 2

  • [codegen] tests/codegen-llvm/sanitizer/address-sanitizer-globals-tracking.rs#ASAN: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [codegen] tests/codegen-llvm/sanitizer/address-sanitizer-globals-tracking.rs#ASAN-FAT-LTO: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [codegen] tests/codegen-llvm/sanitizer/sanitize-off-kasan-asan.rs: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [codegen] tests/codegen-llvm/sanitizer/sanitize-off.rs: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [run-make] tests/run-make/sanitizer-cdylib-link: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> ignore (ignored on targets without sanitizers support) (J0)
  • [run-make] tests/run-make/sanitizer-dylib-link: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> ignore (ignored on targets without sanitizers support) (J0)
  • [run-make] tests/run-make/sanitizer-staticlib-link: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> ignore (ignored on targets without sanitizers support) (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/sanitizer/asan_odr_windows.rs: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> ignore (ignored on targets without sanitizers support) (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/sanitizer/cfg.rs#address: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/target_modifiers/sanitizers-good-for-inconsistency.rs#wrong_address_san: ignore (ignored on targets without address sanitizer) -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/delegation/generics/self-rename.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/on_move/std_impls.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/suggestions/dont-suggest-borrow-whole-call-issue-155088.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/allocator/regression-abort-on-free-issue-150898.rs: [missing] -> pass (J3)
  • [pretty] tests/pretty/delegation-self-rename.rs: [missing] -> pass (J4)
  • [ui] tests/ui/allocator/regression-abort-on-free-issue-150898.rs: [missing] -> ignore (only executed when the target is aarch64-apple-darwin) (J5)
  • [run-make] tests/run-make/compressed-debuginfo-zstd: ignore (ignored if LLVM wasn't build with zstd for ELF section compression or LLVM is not the default codegen backend) -> pass (J6)

Additionally, 302 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 7c61a357e3c91b8a3c02dc63b7744d942d572a9a --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. i686-gnu-nopt-1: 1h 37m -> 2h 24m (+48.2%)
  2. i686-gnu-1: 1h 41m -> 2h 25m (+43.3%)
  3. i686-msvc-2: 1h 42m -> 2h 19m (+36.2%)
  4. pr-check-2: 51m 29s -> 35m 40s (-30.7%)
  5. dist-armv7-linux: 1h 13m -> 1h 34m (+29.2%)
  6. dist-powerpc64le-linux-musl: 1h 18m -> 1h 40m (+28.5%)
  7. dist-aarch64-linux: 2h 34m -> 1h 53m (-26.7%)
  8. dist-aarch64-apple: 2h 20m -> 1h 44m (-25.8%)
  9. x86_64-mingw-2: 2h 47m -> 2h 11m (-21.7%)
  10. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 1h 3m -> 52m 22s (-18.1%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#149452 Refactor out common code into a IndexItem::new constructor dd6669a4bd0349c32ad866077035a503034df1d2 (link)
#153537 rustc_codegen_ssa: Define ELF flag value for sparc-unknown-… 1d188ee10e7eedf2f50689830cb45fbdf0e11a20 (link)
#155219 Do not suggest borrowing enclosing calls for nested where-c… 452a0fc7519ba6357227a138a5c0de3e721ae4ff (link)
#155408 rustdoc: Fix Managarm C Library name in cfg pretty printer 010b2d67814430bff1c4d4f7c9d3d76385b01b52 (link)
#155571 Enable AddressSanitizer on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and … 5f4ac59a0d3caf11169b578b8621afd9139418b8 (link)
#155621 Document #[diagnostic::on_move] in the unstable book. 1cdac7dad988c91e6010ea279678aab26160991b (link)
#155635 delegation: rename Self generic param to This in recurs… ede972a3b17c27410d6e857597c1670f1fae05a5 (link)
#155713 test: Add a regression test for Apple platforms aborting on… 33b0db93ab5318ee66dd3bd8fed5f98b4fc08c2a (link)
#155723 Fix tier level for 5 thumb bare-metal ARM targets 95dbc5c5ac6ce692db5bba87c34caa036a1c66db (link)
#155730 Some cleanups around per parent disambiguators eef9b0508aac665e9a32bb97e088a5fdb62457a0 (link)
#155735 Fix typo by removing extra 'to' 30e8d30bcb2b0d3f2ff9bc1ffd4c5e8303fa7982 (link)
#155736 Remove AllVariants workaround for rust-analyzer bf3c999aad5fde2ade45527a03a81f3fd82cc2de (link)

previous master: acb65f36a0

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (7c61a35): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

  • If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
    please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
    @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
  • If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
    a new PR with a fix for the regression.
  • If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
    you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
    were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 10
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-0.9%, -0.1%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 0.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 9.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
9.6% [2.4%, 23.9%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.1%] 33
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.1%] 22
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [0.0%, 0.1%] 33

Bootstrap: 491.731s -> 491.842s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 394.21 MiB -> 394.33 MiB (0.03%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Apr 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.