fix: mark unresolved auto-router cost as unpriced - #200
Merged
Conversation
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
claude-auto-pilot-fable-v1-canarybut stop pricing the composite auto-router route as Fablerouted-unresolvedas missing pricing in diagnostics and dashboardEvidence
LiteLLM complexity router selects Sonnet, Opus, or Fable per request; the logical route has zero route-level cost and no resolved child-model ledger in Hermes. Fuzzy mapping every route token to Fable overstates cost.
Verification
routed-unresolved, $0, unpriced model signalnpm test1064/1064npm run ci:localPart of #169 cost-accounting follow-up.