Repository navigation
Fix ByteListTag reading its own type and single-element lists - #280
Merged
Merged
Conversation
PMK744
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed
ByteListTag.readchecked the tag type againstTagType.Byteinstead ofTagType.ByteList, so reading a byte list withtype: truealways threwExpected tag type to be Byte, received ByteList.new ByteListTag([5])created an empty array of length 5 (the same asArray(5)) instead of[5], becausesuper(...elements)treats a single number as a length. The elements are now pushed aftersuper().