Skip to content

docs: enforce Promise.withResolvers() more explicitly. #13600

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
WebReflection merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2026
+1 −1
Merged

docs: enforce Promise.withResolvers() more explicitly. #13600

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion AGENTS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Examples: `fix(tui): simplify thinking toggle styling`, `docs: update contributi
- Prefer single word variable names where possible
- Use Bun APIs when possible, like `Bun.file()`
- Rely on type inference when possible; avoid explicit type annotations or interfaces unless necessary for exports or clarity
- Prefer `Promise.withResolvers<T>()` for deferreds when runtime/types support it; allow callback/event executors, not async executors or redundant Promise wrapping.
- Always use `Promise.withResolvers<T>()` to create deferred promises; all supported runtimes provide it. Never capture `resolve` and `reject` from a `new Promise` executor in external variables or object properties.

### Avoid let statements

Expand Down
Loading