Link Krippendorff (2011) to the Annenberg School copy - #86
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The Penn repository copy of Krippendorff (2011) became unreliable to reach: across checks on 2026-09-28 it answered in 2 to 10 seconds, returned a 502 once, and timed out the release gate's five-second URL check twice, so the gate failed intermittently on a link no change had touched, and CRAN's URL check at the 1.0 submission could flag it too. At the maintainer's choice, the reference now links to the copy on the Annenberg School's site, which answered in under a second each time. It is the same paper, "Computing Krippendorff's Alpha-Reliability", dated 2011.1.25, with its reading list updated on 2013.9.13; the reference keeps 2011, the Penn repository's own date for it. The link changes in the README, REFERENCES.bib, and ?panel_agreement (with the Rd escapes), and the expert-panel vignette's reference list gains it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Sep 28, 2026
JUhalt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2026
Release contentvalidR 0.10.1 A documentation release. It stamps the version, release notes, citation metadata, README, and roadmap for 0.10.1, which puts the handoff on the front page: - the README section "The handoff to nomologR", mirrored by nomologR's "The handoff from contentvalidR" (#85); - Krippendorff (2011) linked to the Annenberg School copy (#86); - the nomologR reader recorded as tested against 0.6.0 through 0.10.0 (#87). No computed value changes: 25 analyses across every workflow return the same values as v0.10.0, and no function, argument, or handoff field changed. Released on GitHub and R-universe; CRAN keeps 0.4.0 until the joint 1.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Switches the Krippendorff (2011) link from the Penn repository to the copy on the Annenberg School's site, as the maintainer chose on 2026-09-28. Docs only: no code, no computed value, and no handoff change.
Why
The Penn repository copy became unreliable to reach. Across checks on 2026-09-28 it:
So the gate failed intermittently on a link that no change had touched. CRAN's URL check at the 1.0 submission could flag it too. The Annenberg copy answered in under a second each time.
Same paper
Both copies are "Computing Krippendorff's Alpha-Reliability", dated 2011.1.25. The Penn repository gives 2011-01-25 as the date. The Annenberg copy notes that its reading list was updated on 2013.9.13. The reference keeps 2011.
Where the link changes
README.Rmd/README.mdinst/REFERENCES.bib?panel_agreement, with the\%escapes the Rd format needs. The rendered help shows the link intact.vignette("expert-panel-validity"): its reference list lacked the link, and APA expects it for a manuscript retrieved online.Verification
tools/release-gate.Ron this PR's head (96bac4b), run in a detached worktree: build, smoke, and check all pass; R CMD check 0 errors, 0 warnings, and only the two expected notes. (The maintainer merged on green CI while the gate was in its smoke stage; it finished passing afterwards.)🤖 Generated with Claude Code