Test every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths - #77
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The 0.9.0 print methods were only half covered: R/component_print.R stood at 57% in CI, which pulled overall coverage from 94.5% (0.8.0) to 92.9%. Tests only; no package code changes. - test-component-print.R: every one of the 14 component prints, with the branches their notes depend on: no interval, missing assignments, a bootstrap interval, a between-judges ANOVA (no Greenhouse-Geisser note), expert judges (no Colquitt band), a chi-square that cannot be computed, pairs sorted by different numbers of judges, a csv_binom_test result saved before 0.9.0, and the plain print after subsetting. - test-reporting.R: the APA report for every workflow and expert mode (construct rating, essentiality, congruence, Delphi, domain), and the note an empty APA report prints. - test-legacy-paths.R (new): the Monte Carlo helpers' argument checks and results, older decision wording mapping onto the shared statuses, the workflow constructor's checks and legacy aliases, and expert objects saved before 0.0.6 in all three modes. Coverage: 95.6% measured locally with covr (92.9% before, 94.5% at 0.8.0). All 2,940 tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
JUhalt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
Brings #77's tests (every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths) into the release, so the tag carries them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
JUhalt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
JUhalt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
Stamps the version, release notes, citation metadata, README, and roadmap for the ninth public release, which is about how the package presents itself before 1.0: every reference list in APA 7 form (#72), shorter output that says what it means with component functions and report tables in APA style (#73), figures that show the criterion and the uncertainty with alt text on every figure (#74), and a README that is a front page (#75). No computed value changes: 25 analyses across every workflow return the same values as v0.8.0. Breaking: content_report() writes an APA table by default (format = "data.frame" restores the numeric table), and the 14 component results gain a class so they print formatted (values unchanged). Deprecated: agreement_summary(), removed in 1.0.0; use panel_agreement(). Before tagging, #77 tested every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths: 2,940 tests pass and coverage is 95.6% (94.5% at 0.8.0). Release gate passed on a commit with this tree. Published on GitHub and R-universe. 0.4.0 is still in CRAN's review queue, and CRAN policy asks that no further version be submitted while one is pending. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tests only, ahead of tagging 0.9.0. In the pre-release review, the maintainer chose to close a coverage gap I had left before publishing. The 0.9.0 print methods were only half covered:
R/component_print.Rstood at 57% in CI, which pulled overall coverage from 94.5% at 0.8.0 down to 92.9%. No package code changes.test-component-print.R: all 14 component prints are now tested, including the branches their notes depend on:csv_binom_test()result saved before 0.9.0;test-reporting.R: the APA report for every workflow and expert mode (construct rating, essentiality, congruence, Delphi, domain), and the note an empty APA report prints.test-legacy-paths.R(new):sim_helpers.Rfrom 41% to fully covered;Result: all 2,940 tests pass (80 new), and covr measures 95.6% locally.
After this merges,
masteris merged into the release branch (#76), which is re-gated before the release is merged, tagged, and published.🤖 Generated with Claude Code