Release contentvalidR 0.9.0 - #76
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Stamps the version, release notes, citation metadata, README, and roadmap for the ninth public release, which is about how the package presents itself before 1.0: every reference list in APA 7 form, shorter output that says what it means, component functions and report tables in APA style, figures that show the criterion and the uncertainty, and a README that is a front page. No computed value changes: 25 analyses across every workflow return the same values as v0.8.0. The NEWS intro lists the wording that changes, the two breaking changes (content_report()'s APA default, with format = "data.frame" restoring the numeric table, and the class the component results gain), and the deprecation of agreement_summary(), removed in 1.0.0. Published on GitHub and R-universe. 0.4.0 is still in CRAN's review queue, and CRAN policy asks that no further version be submitted while one is pending. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 0.9.0 print methods were only half covered: R/component_print.R stood at 57% in CI, which pulled overall coverage from 94.5% (0.8.0) to 92.9%. Tests only; no package code changes. - test-component-print.R: every one of the 14 component prints, with the branches their notes depend on: no interval, missing assignments, a bootstrap interval, a between-judges ANOVA (no Greenhouse-Geisser note), expert judges (no Colquitt band), a chi-square that cannot be computed, pairs sorted by different numbers of judges, a csv_binom_test result saved before 0.9.0, and the plain print after subsetting. - test-reporting.R: the APA report for every workflow and expert mode (construct rating, essentiality, congruence, Delphi, domain), and the note an empty APA report prints. - test-legacy-paths.R (new): the Monte Carlo helpers' argument checks and results, older decision wording mapping onto the shared statuses, the workflow constructor's checks and legacy aliases, and expert objects saved before 0.0.6 in all three modes. Coverage: 95.6% measured locally with covr (92.9% before, 94.5% at 0.8.0). All 2,940 tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings #77's tests (every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths) into the release, so the tag carries them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stamps 0.9.0. The maintainer approved merging it once CI is green; the merge commit is then tagged
v0.9.0(annotated) and the GitHub release is created, which is what R-universe builds from.0.9.0 is the pre-1.0 "show time" release: how the package presents itself before 1.0. It contains #72–#75, plus #77's tests:
REFERENCES.bibholds all 53 cited works, checked against Crossref; the expert-panel print opens with its verdict; the modified-kappa range is correctedcontent_report()APA by default;agreement_summary()deprecatedThe stamp
DESCRIPTION: 0.8.0.9000 → 0.9.0.CITATION.cff: 0.9.0, released 2026-09-27. If publication happens on a later day, the date moves with it.README: "Current stable release: 0.9.0."
NEWS.md: the heading and an introduction covering:content_report()'s APA default, withformat = "data.frame"restoring the numeric table; and the class the 14 component results gain, with values unchanged andas.data.frame()returning the plain frame;agreement_summary(), to be removed in 1.0.0;The "(in development)" tags come off the section headings.
ROADMAP.md: a v0.9.0 section listing Put every reference list in APA 7 form, and fix what the output misstated #72–Make the README a front page, and move its planning examples to a vignette #75.Verification
domain_validity()'s interpretation text ("items" for "item(s)").tools/release-gate.Ron ae6bae2 (the stamp plus Test every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths #77's tests): build, smoke and check all PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, the two expected notes.master(with Test every component print, the APA reports, and the legacy paths #77) was then merged in; the head (5835111) has a tree identical to ae6bae2's. The stamp alone had also passed the gate, on 59a3834.Distribution
GitHub and R-universe. 0.4.0 is still in CRAN's
newbiesqueue (day 9, checked 2026-09-27), and CRAN policy asks that no further version be submitted while one is pending.🤖 Generated with Claude Code