You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Reuse slide translations across services, not only saved ones #187
The library (slideLibrary.ts) only holds what a reviewer explicitly saved. The review screen's Save is its only writer. Everything else lives only in the per-day doc and is gone next week:
translate-ahead drafts;
agent follow-up revisions (applyUpdates in SlideReviewContainer.tsx);
So a hymn sung every month is drafted from scratch, and paid for, every time unless someone pressed Save. Each new draft is as likely to make a good translation worse as to make a bad one better. Policy: reuse what was translated before; re-translate only when someone explicitly asks.
Design questions
Where it lives. Either the library caches every draft, or a separate draft store sits beside it. provenance (llm vs human) already records which entries were human-saved. That is a fact about the text's origin, not the reviewed/auto status flag Drop the reviewed/auto tier from slide translations #182 removed.
The Saved chip (SlideReview.tsx) compares the draft to the library. If drafts land in the library too, every draft reads "Saved". The chip would have to key on provenance: 'human' instead.
Notes ride along. If a draft is reused next week without its note, the reason it needed a look is lost.
What an explicit Re-translate writes. Today it fills the review grid only (in the browser). Viewers see it only after a per-cell Save, and the picker's note count doesn't see it. If explicit is the only way to re-translate, its result should probably reach the store directly.
What happens to a bad cached draft. Without a human looking at it, it sticks. That is the accepted cost of the policy, but the review screen should make a stale or poor draft easy to find. Notes are part of that.
Relationship
Makes the doc lookup in #186 redundant once in place; #186 is the cheap stopgap. Overlaps with the conversation issue, because a reused translation's history (prior feedback) is keyed differently from the translation itself.
Activity