docs(gaps): add exact-head readiness baseline - #130
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough제품·기술 격차 기준선 문서를 갱신했습니다. 스냅샷 시간과 열린 PR 수를 변경했습니다. PR별 현재 헤드, 필수 검사, 미해결 리뷰 스레드 상태를 반영했습니다. Changes제품·기술 격차 기준선
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR refreshes a tracked readiness document and does not change product behavior or runtime configuration; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Noema LLM review
The PR adds a documentation baseline that accurately reflects the live exact-head GitHub inventory. Prior review feedback (PR count exclusion, #129 RED state, #112 missing Strix, #95 gate mislabeling, broken links) has been incorporated. The document is internally consistent, clearly dated, and does not introduce code or behavioral changes. No blocking issues remain.
Reviewed changed lines
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:3 (RIGHT): Snapshot date and scope note correctly identify the inventory as a dated snapshot, not a perpetual live claim. This addresses the mixed-time concern from prior threads.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT): The open PR count explicitly excludes #130 and matches the 17 rows in the table. The #129 row now records the historical RED state and points to section 1.1 for newer evidence, resolving the prior thread.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:36 (RIGHT): The #112 row now identifies the absent required Strix Security Scan, correcting the earlier claim that all hosted checks were green. This aligns with the prior bug report.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:39 (RIGHT): The #95 row now correctly states Strix failed and opencode-review lacks a passing verdict, reversing the earlier mislabeling. Unresolved threads and missing approval are also noted.
Adversarial validation
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT)falsified: The open PR count and table rows are consistent and exclude #130. — Counted 17 rows in the table (PRs #135, #134, #131, #129, #127, #126, #115, #114, #112, #111, #95, #94, #93, #90, #88, #77, #72) and the text states '17 other open PRs, intentionally excluding this baseline PR (#130)'. The count matches exactly.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:33 (RIGHT)falsified: The #129 row accurately reflects the historical RED state and does not claim current readiness. — The row states 'Draft, intentionally blocked' and 'Historical 2026-08-31 snapshot: the then-current head was intentionally RED and lacked independent review.' It also directs to section 1.1 for newer evidence, which is dated 2026-09-01 and explicitly notes the head is not protected-main truth.- Residual risk: The document is a point-in-time snapshot; external PR states may have changed since the snapshot date. However, the document explicitly disclaims perpetual live status and provides a refresh mechanism in section 1.1.
Findings
-
No blocking findings.
-
Result: APPROVE
-
Head SHA:
8472b54e3dc83a690ef9302ee883f0bf5ffd2990 -
Reviewer credential:
noema-review-github-app -
Actor:
cwl-noema-review[bot]
|
@devin Refresh the canonical baseline on this existing branch from live protected Re-read the full live Wardnet PR/issue inventory and update only |
|
Failed to start a Devin session. Please try again. |
|
Single-writer baseline handoff, fresh exact Wardnet evidence for #83/#165; no baseline source edited outside this PR.
Please carry this only when the baseline lane next refreshes from live evidence; do not infer remote GREEN or protected readiness from the source-level parser repair. |
|
Sole-ledger refresh input after this branch's last snapshot: Runtime Configuration #140 no longer merely “still requires fresh integration.” It is now directly based on protected Fresh #140 exact-head execution remains non-passing: CI Fresh read-only Context Fabric inventory is otherwise consistent with the ledger: CGC default/protected |
|
Single-writer handoff for the next Fresh security/buyer-gap delta since current #130 head
Baseline acceptance wording should distinguish planned/proposed architecture, unreleased owner dependency, exact-head queued evidence, and protected shipped truth. Do not promote #171/#173, EA #49, EgressWeave #237, CGC open PRs, or quarantine #1 into released capability claims. |
|
Single-writer ledger handoff: #166 advanced from |
|
@jules Single-writer ledger refresh on PR #130 only. Expected head:
Keep all other current facts unless a fresh live read disproves them. Change only |
|
@jules Fresh exact-state handoff for the sole
Please re-read the full live Wardnet/foreign-owner inventory before writing, adopt any additional intervening deltas, and update only the gap-ledger branch. Preserve Draft/single-writer status, do not force-push/rebase or edit other PR branches, and reacquire exact-head docs/repository/security evidence after the substantive ledger update. |
|
Gap-ledger handoff: supply-chain lane #141 is now a Draft preservation predecessor because protected Fresh upstream GitHub release inventory still places immutable |
Purpose
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdis Wardnet's sole commercial/product-technical current-state ledger. This Draft keeps protected-main security, DDD ownership, central control-plane evidence, release readiness, Context Fabric dependencies and buyer-visible gaps code-current without creating a second writer for the same path.Exact documentation lane — 2026-09-06 KST
Current exact head is
15de2ed7f819a067d72e09df5702d9daa3f73ac4. Protected/defaultmainremains #171 squasha52ccd0a24a727d9349bb32def7713882d8cad1e; this lane remains mergeable, based on that exact protected truth, and changes onlydocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.The current ledger refresh supersedes stale execution descriptions without changing Wardnet runtime semantics. It records that #167's normal current-head CI/Fuzz/Security/Semgrep lanes are now terminal GREEN while CodeQL fails only at the delegated-verdict enforcement boundary; #170's current CI/Fuzz are GREEN; new current-base #174 carries the exact one-line CodeQL SARIF uploader successor while downstream hosted worker jobs remain
runner_id=0; the live solo-maintainer ruleset defect remains on.github#772;.github#1929now distinguishes the human review-fix dispatch producer from machine OpenCode/CodeQL producers rather than widening a machine allowlist to the human account; and the read-only Context Fabric inventory is corrected to CGC #21b4dced3...and EA #40c6b3873..., both still unreleased and without exact-head workflow materialization.Fresh release inventory remains empty for Wardnet, Context Graph Contracts, EA Core, EgressWeave, contextual-orchestrator, quarantine-sandbox-runtime and AppGuardrail. Protected Wardnet
main@a52ccd0...continues to have terminal GREEN observed push validations, but that does not authorize release or product merge because normal-vs-bypass governance is unresolved and mandatory buyer/security gaps remain candidate-only.The preceding exact ledger head
34cba71fa7746d12cb3b60529c7163f391426bbacompleted repository CI34001972084, Security Scan34001972074, SAST Semgrep34001972091, and CodeQL PR34001972095successfully. Those results are predecessor evidence only after this substantive documentation update.Exact-current execution
Fresh normal PR workflows have materialized on exact
15de2ed7f819a067d72e09df5702d9daa3f73ac4: CI34008105942, Security Scan34008105932, SAST Semgrep34008106119, and CodeQL PR34008105933are currently queued. They are non-passing current-head evidence. Do not add a no-op commit, change runner selectors or transfer predecessor checks merely to accelerate queue acquisition; re-read this unchanged head before any readiness claim.Single-writer and integration discipline
#130 remains the sole writer for
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. Other Wardnet lanes hand exact evidence into #130 rather than editing the ledger. Keep Draft until the unchanged exact head has terminal then-live repository/security/review/governance evidence. No self/model approval, routine or implicit administrator bypass, gate weakening, force push/destructive rebase, stale-check transfer or predecessor-evidence reuse.