docs: reinforce loop-goal block discipline and local dev authority - #1643
docs: reinforce loop-goal block discipline and local dev authority#1643seonghobae wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change adds loop-goal discipline guidance to ChangesLoop-goal discipline
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change documents local development and loop-goal blocking boundaries and adds checks that preserve the guidance. No concrete current-head merge risk remains. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review only current base |
|
@codex review Review current exact head |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
base='7bfc7cae2c12b00e59688230e0057a64e3d6dc0e'
head='46f7a3ad2bf464cca1332ca54fadbbec2be96f25'
printf '%s\n' '== Exact range status =='
git rev-parse --verify "${base}^{commit}"
git rev-parse --verify "${head}^{commit}"
git merge-base --is-ancestor "$base" "$head"
git rev-list --left-right --count "${base}...${head}"
git diff --name-status "${base}..${head}"
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=80 "${base}..${head}" -- \
AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py
printf '%s\n' '== Test file outline =='
ast-grep outline backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py --items all || true
printf '%s\n' '== Related source-governance tests and helper conventions =='
fd -t f -a . backend/tests | rg 'loop_goal|discipline|agents|claude|governance' || true
rg -n -C 5 --glob 'backend/tests/**/*.py' \
'(AGENTS\.md|CLAUDE\.md|read_text|assert .* in|assert .*not in|source-governance)' \
backend/tests || trueLength of output: 197320 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
base='7bfc7cae2c12b00e59688230e0057a64e3d6dc0e'
head='46f7a3ad2bf464cca1332ca54fadbbec2be96f25'
printf '%s\n' '== Exact range =='
printf 'left-right count: '
git rev-list --left-right --count "${base}...${head}"
printf '%s\n' 'changed files:'
git diff --name-status "${base}..${head}"
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: AGENTS.md =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=12 "${base}..${head}" -- AGENTS.md
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: CLAUDE.md =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=12 "${base}..${head}" -- CLAUDE.md
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: contract test =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=20 "${base}..${head}" -- backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py
printf '%s\n' '== Complete contract test at head =='
git show "${head}:backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py" | nl -ba
printf '%s\n' '== Relevant loop-goal sections at head =='
git show "${head}:AGENTS.md" | nl -ba | grep -A140 -B5 -F '## Loop-goal block discipline and local development authority'
git show "${head}:CLAUDE.md" | nl -ba | grep -A140 -B5 -F '## Loop-goal block discipline and local development authority'
printf '%s\n' '== Existing owner-boundary wording at head =='
for file in AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md; do
printf '%s\n' "--- ${file} ---"
git show "${head}:${file}" | nl -ba | grep -i -E -C 3 \
'single.writer|single-writer|permission|forbidden|ask|deny|opencode\.json|contextual-orchestrator|provider/model'
doneLength of output: 35488 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
head='46f7a3ad2bf464cca1332ca54fadbbec2be96f25'
printf '%s\n' '== CLAUDE.md boundary-term occurrences at the exact head =='
git show "${head}:CLAUDE.md" | nl -ba | grep -i -E -C 2 \
'single.writer|single-writer|another writer|active.writer|permission denial|server permission|read.only scope|read-only scope|rejection|ask.*deny|deny.*ask'
printf '%s\n' '== New CLAUDE.md section and its source-contract assertions =='
git show "${head}:CLAUDE.md" | nl -ba | sed -n '201,218p'
git show "${head}:backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py" | nl -ba | sed -n '11,39p'Length of output: 4217
Finding — Add the equivalent single-writer, rejection, read-only-scope, and permission-denial limits to The test is non-vacuous because it reads the actual repository documents. It is incomplete for the stated cross-document governance contract. You are interacting with an AI system. |
|
@coderabbitai review Re-review only current base |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
base='7bfc7cae2c12b00e59688230e0057a64e3d6dc0e'
head='323607859a36c544f2a7750763c2d314a3a40762'
printf '%s\n' '== Exact range identity and topology =='
git rev-parse --verify "${base}^{commit}"
git rev-parse --verify "${head}^{commit}"
git merge-base --is-ancestor "$base" "$head"
printf 'left-right count: '
git rev-list --left-right --count "${base}...${head}"
printf '%s\n' 'changed files:'
git diff --name-status "${base}..${head}"
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: AGENTS.md =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=24 "${base}..${head}" -- AGENTS.md
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: CLAUDE.md =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=24 "${base}..${head}" -- CLAUDE.md
printf '%s\n' '== Exact diff: source-governance contract =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=36 "${base}..${head}" -- backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py
printf '%s\n' '== Complete source-governance contract at exact head =='
git show "${head}:backend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py" | nl -ba
printf '%s\n' '== Loop-goal sections at exact head =='
for file in AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md; do
printf '%s\n' "--- ${file} ---"
git show "${head}:${file}" | nl -ba | grep -F -A100 -B4 \
'## Loop-goal block discipline and local development authority'
done
printf '%s\n' '== Required inherited ownership terms at exact head =='
for file in AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md; do
printf '%s\n' "--- ${file} ---"
git show "${head}:${file}" | nl -ba | grep -i -E -C2 \
'opencode\.json|contextual-orchestrator|provider/model|provider.*model|model.*provider'
doneLength of output: 25100
The range is ahead-only ( The prior boundary finding is repaired. The source-governance test is non-vacuous. It reads the checked-in repository documents. It asserts each repaired The test also preserves the inherited OpenCode and I found no new issues in the requested exact range. This re-review does not transfer predecessor evidence or constitute approval. ✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Current authority — 2026-09-10
#1625@7bfc7cae2c12b00e59688230e0057a64e3d6dc0e05af4d05716d54318f49ff4bada03567d22813892024287eaeda38268e95915c127d9dea4d59657dvia merged temporary chore(stack): integrate current governance owner into loop-discipline docs #164446f7a3ad2bf464cca1332ca54fadbbec2be96f255615017984found CLAUDE omitted the explicit single-writer/read-only/server-permission/rejection limits that AGENTS preserved15c2a0881435ea390fd40a625a2418563ff6452fd6f527bf6e358416137d04b3a0261b2683068f0b323607859a36c544f2a7750763c2d314a3a40762behind_by=0) —AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md, andbackend/tests/test_loop_goal_block_discipline_docs.py.The original docs-only proposal was based directly on protected
developand therefore crossed active AGENTS/CLAUDE authority in the #1528→#1549→#1625 governance stack. Temporary integration PR #1644 normally merged current #1625 into this branch; #1643 was then retargeted tocodex/remove-repo-opencode-config. No force-push, destructive rebase, source copy or gate weakening was used.The retained guidance distinguishes remote-head/CI/review waits from true top-level blockers, preserves explicit policy/permission denials as higher authority, forbids trial-running prohibited actions, requires blocker candidates to be validated against node/head/policy/dependency state, and forbids fake progress/infinite polling. It does not authorize bypassing single-writer scopes, secrets, paid resources, operations or effective ask/deny rules.
CodeRabbit independently verified the first three-file range and found one valid governance gap: CLAUDE's shorter copy allowed independent branch/worktree creation without explicitly restating AGENTS' read-only, single-writer, prior-rejection and server-permission-denial boundaries.
15c2a088...first made those missing limits executable RED assertions.d6f527bf...then added the minimal equivalent CLAUDE boundary: a read-only scope, another writer's single-writer boundary, an explicit server permission denial or prior rejection remains binding and cannot be bypassed by a replacement branch/worktree.32360785...only makes the prose assertion robust to Markdown line wrapping; it does not weaken the semantic checks.The source-governance test also proves inherited #1625 boundaries remain present: repository-local
opencode.json[c]stays forbidden and provider/model routing remains owned bycontextual-orchestrator.Exact-head evidence boundary
Fresh #1625→#1643 compare is ahead-only/behind 0 and exactly three files. CodeRabbit submitted formal
APPROVEDreviewPRR_kwDOSNjZ2s8AAAABM9Cj4Qat2026-09-10T07:52:34Z, after exact323607859...was created at07:48:31Z; this satisfies the independent current-head review lane for the unchanged head.Executable evidence is still missing. Fresh lookup for
323607859...returns zero PR-triggered workflow runs. Feature-base stacked PR execution remains owned by.github#2073; predecessor direct-develop receipts do not transfer after owner adoption or source/test children. Do not retarget this PR todevelop, push a dummy commit, copy central workflow source, synthesize a status or treat review approval as test execution.Codex review was unavailable on the previous attempt because the connector reported its code-review usage limit; that does not invalidate the independent CodeRabbit approval and does not authorize a bypass.
Keep Draft until the canonical stacked-PR exact-head executable path exists, the prerequisite stack is protected-integrated in order, and then-live required contexts are terminal-success. No direct-provider/model workaround, second governance owner or premature merge/release claim.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests