Skip to content

security: bind Brew cleanup audit records to private storage - #187

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 20 commits into
fix/release-artifact-windows-namespace-v1from
security/brew-cleanup-audit-private-authority-v1
Draft

security: bind Brew cleanup audit records to private storage#187
seonghobae wants to merge 20 commits into
fix/release-artifact-windows-namespace-v1from
security/brew-cleanup-audit-private-authority-v1

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

Bind immutable Homebrew cleanup audit publication to the exact private directory object that was authorized, closing shared-writable storage and same-user pathname-replacement authority gaps without changing Homebrew command, model, human-approval, or evidence semantics.

Exact current state — 2026-09-07

  • exact source head: fa1fead83d77d01a1ec00dddcb6c0fd317e145e0;
  • canonical release-owner base: #264 at fea9144a15234035fbdf37e9fa914e5fd51efdec;
  • owner-base → head is ahead-only (ahead 20 / behind 0) with merge base exactly fix: verify Windows release artifact namespace #264 head; the remaining semantic diff is the five Brew/private-evidence security paths;
  • PR is Draft and mechanically mergeable; mergeability is not merge authorization;
  • predecessor head fb274c2d1de12459c24da5a093a21301e7d5830e failed Release run 33261164075, job 99125782036, after all three platform builds and artifact downloads succeeded. The verifier expected release-disksage-windows-latest-1 while the matrix produced release-disksage-windows-2022-1;
  • fix: verify Windows release artifact namespace #264 is the canonical tested owner of that release namespace and rerun contract. Ordinary two-parent merge fa1fead83d77d01a1ec00dddcb6c0fd317e145e0 integrates it without copying or reimplementing the fix;
  • local integrated-tree npm test is GREEN: 40 Vitest files / 164 tests plus 2 Node concurrency contracts. Fresh hosted exact-head evidence remains required; predecessor results do not transfer.

Test-first security repair

The implementation proves the object-bound publication contract by opening the audit directory with no-follow directory semantics, validating opened object and pathname device/inode identity plus private mode, creating immutable records descriptor-relative with openat(O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOFOLLOW), writing/fsyncing and hardening through the exact opened record, fsyncing the exact directory, cleaning failures descriptor-relative, and revalidating directory/record identities before returning. A same-user rename-and-replacement race fails closed with brew-cleanup-audit-directory-identity-drift and does not redirect the record into the replacement directory.

Unsupported non-Unix publication remains explicit/fail-closed; Homebrew execution authority remains macOS-only.

Stack / ownership

This PR remains the security-delta owner for issue #194's descriptor/handle-relative publication primitive, stacked on canonical release owner #264. Downstream #205 has now been advanced onto this exact head while retaining only its Intel Homebrew compatibility delta. Closed predecessor #228 is preserved by verified complete successor carryover into this exact head: its two semantic files (src-tauri/src/private_evidence.rs and src-tauri/tests/private_evidence_umask.rs) differ only by rustfmt-equivalent trailing-comma/line layout. The evidence and retirement rationale are recorded on #228. #206 remains downstream of #205.

#174 owns generic cleanup, #156 repository-wide exact coverage/release evidence, #150 Podman desktop evidence, and #149 canonical acquisition documentation.

Required before merge

Keep Draft until the unchanged exact head satisfies every applicable live required workflow, repository-wide exact 100% owned-production coverage without threshold or production-scope weakening, zero valid current-head findings, fresh live-base ancestry, and actual live governance. Pending, queued, skipped-required, failed, stale, predecessor, model-only, status-only, diagnostic-only, synthetic, or author-only evidence is non-passing.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Please review the unchanged exact head 8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5 against live protected main be418bac9bfbdc8aa41b1a698713833e3dbccfdc. Release compilation has completed successfully on Linux, macOS, and Windows; Test, Security Scan, and SAST remain pending and are not represented as passing.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo '== Git identity and delta =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git rev-parse 8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5
git merge-base be418bac9bfbdc8aa41b1a698713833e3dbccfdc 8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5
git diff --name-status be418bac9bfbdc8aa41b1a698713833e3dbccfdc 8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5

echo '== Rust structure =='
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs --items all --type function,impl,struct,mod --view expanded
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests.rs --items all --type function,mod --view expanded
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/lib.rs --items all --type mod --view expanded

echo '== Focused audit implementation references =='
rg -n -C 5 --type rust \
  'write_audit_record|brew-cleanup-audit-(parent|directory)-writable-by-others|brew-cleanup-records|DirBuilderExt|OpenOptionsExt|set_permissions|sync_all|remove_file' \
  src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests.rs src-tauri/src/lib.rs

echo '== PR and check state =='
gh pr view 187 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/disksage \
  --json number,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup,files \
  --jq '{number, headRefOid, baseRefOid, mergeStateStatus, checks: [.statusCheckRollup[] | {name, status, conclusion, detailsUrl}], files: [.files[].path]}'

Length of output: 1981


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -u

echo '== Supported structural maps =='
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs --items all --type function,struct,mod --view expanded || true
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests.rs --items all --type function,struct,mod --view expanded || true
ast-grep outline src-tauri/src/lib.rs --items all --type function,struct,mod --view expanded || true

echo '== Exact source diff =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=80 \
  be418bac9bfbdc8aa41b1a698713833e3dbccfdc \
  8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5 \
  -- src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests.rs src-tauri/src/lib.rs

echo '== Focused implementation and regression source =='
rg -n -C 12 --type rust \
  'fn write_audit_record|fn .*writable|brew-cleanup-audit-(parent|directory)-writable-by-others|brew-cleanup-records|DirBuilderExt|OpenOptionsExt|set_permissions|sync_all|remove_file|audit_authority_tests' \
  src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests.rs src-tauri/src/lib.rs

Length of output: 37684


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

gh pr view 187 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/disksage \
  --json number,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup,files \
  --jq '{number, headRefOid, baseRefOid, mergeStateStatus, checks: [.statusCheckRollup[] | {name, status, conclusion, detailsUrl}], files: [.files[].path]}'

Length of output: 5512


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo '== Existing audit-record tests =='
sed -n '620,760p' src-tauri/src/brew_cleanup.rs

echo '== Test configuration candidates =='
fd -a -t f 'Cargo.toml|Cargo.lock' . \
  -E target -E node_modules \
  | while IFS= read -r file; do
      echo "--- $file"
      rg -n -C 3 'tempfile|^\[dev-dependencies\]|^\[workspace' "$file" || true
    done

echo '== Direct audit writer references and test module registration =='
rg -n -C 5 --type rust \
  '\bwrite_audit_record\s*\(|mod\s+brew_cleanup_audit_authority_tests\b|audit_records_are_create_new_and_private' \
  src-tauri/src

Length of output: 9131


@seonghobae No blocking source findings found in the exact be418bac9bfbdc8aa41b1a698713833e3dbccfdc..8e676ea5e89dd473a7b0c6ca763ddb7f71599ea5 delta.

The implementation rejects group and other write authority on the app-data directory and on an existing audit directory. It creates the audit directory with mode 0o700. It creates audit records with create_new(true) and mode 0o400. It hardens the opened file with file.set_permissions, without re-resolving the record pathname.

The existing audit test verifies create-once behavior and final Unix mode 0o400. The new crate-internal tests use schema-valid records and independently cover 0o020 and 0o002 for both storage boundaries.

The Linux, macOS, and Windows Release builds succeeded. Test, Semgrep, and Security Scan checks remain queued. The PR remains BLOCKED. These checks, plus the immutable predecessor’s intended RED evidence and required coverage evidence, must complete before approval.

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c.

  • Head SHA: b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c

  • Workflow run: 31796494843

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

  • Result: FAIL
  • Test evidence: not proven passing
  • Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
  • Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c
  • Workflow run: 31799045915
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c.

  • Head SHA: b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c

  • Workflow run: 31799045915

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

  • Result: FAIL
  • Test evidence: not proven passing
  • Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
  • Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c.

  • Head SHA: b633e3efc90fcb053db3b6ca4f3695304206cf2c

  • Workflow run: 31799045915

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

  • Result: FAIL
  • Test evidence: not proven passing
  • Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
  • Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft August 14, 2026 20:18
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2026 21:19
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft August 17, 2026 09:05
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 10:38
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft August 20, 2026 16:10
@seonghobae
seonghobae dismissed opencode-agent[bot]’s stale review August 22, 2026 07:35

Dismissing: this REQUEST_CHANGES was posted against commit b633e3e where coverage-evidence failed. The PR's current head has coverage-evidence passing (verified via gh pr checks). No unresolved review threads remain. Re-request review to re-validate.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot added area: security Security boundary, hardening, or vulnerability prevention priority: high High-priority or P1 work status: draft Draft pull request type: security Security vulnerability or security-specific remediation labels Aug 22, 2026
* test: prove private evidence parent replacement race

* fix: bind private evidence writes to opened parent

* test: prove private evidence parent permission drift

* fix: revalidate private evidence parent permissions

* test: preserve replaced private evidence on failed cleanup

* security: preserve identity-mismatched evidence replacements

* security: invalidate failed evidence through opened descriptor

* test: prove private evidence mode survives restrictive umask

* fix: normalize private evidence mode after open

* test: isolate restrictive umask to record creation

* test: cover post-create parent replacement

* refactor: centralize private parent validation

* fix(stack): preserve current audit root in private evidence owner

* test: expose pre-open private evidence parent race

* fix: bind private evidence parent before canonicalization

* refactor: expose object-bound evidence publication primitive

* test: expose shared object-bound publication seam

* fix: use C-compatible private evidence mode argument
# Conflicts:
#	src-tauri/Cargo.toml
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2026 15:45

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 5 potential issues.

Devin Review

Comment on lines +275 to +283

if let Err(error) = publication {
let invalidation = file
.set_len(0)
.and_then(|_| file.sync_all())
.and_then(|_| directory.sync_all());
if invalidation.is_err() {
return Err(ObjectBoundPublicationError::InvalidationFailed);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Failed private exports block retries

When any post-creation step fails, set_len(0) leaves the requested output name occupied. Retrying the private export at that path then fails.

Prompt for agents
Restore retryable failure semantics for write_object_bound_bytes_create_new_with_hooks in src-tauri/src/private_evidence.rs without reintroducing pathname-replacement deletion. After a post-create failure, remove the entry only through the opened parent descriptor and only after verifying that the descriptor-relative name still identifies the opened file. Preserve any foreign replacement. Add tests for both an ordinary post-create failure followed by a successful retry at the same path and the existing replacement-record case.
Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment on lines +516 to +524
let mut builder = std::fs::DirBuilder::new();
#[cfg(unix)]
{
use std::os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt;
builder.mode(0o700);
}
match builder.create(&directory) {
Ok(()) => {}
Err(error) if error.kind() == std::io::ErrorKind::AlreadyExists => {}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Restrictive umasks suppress cleanup audits

With an owner-write-masking umask, builder.mode(0o700) creates a read-only audit directory. Every cleanup then completes without an audit record.

Prompt for agents
Make audit_directory normalize a newly created brew-cleanup-records directory to exact private, owner-writable permissions through an object-bound directory descriptor before record publication. DirBuilder mode is filtered by umask, so creation under umask 0200 currently yields mode 0500. Preserve the existing symlink, identity, and shared-writable checks, and add an isolated child-process restrictive-umask regression like private_evidence_umask.rs.
Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment on lines +275 to +283

if let Err(error) = publication {
let invalidation = file
.set_len(0)
.and_then(|_| file.sync_all())
.and_then(|_| directory.sync_all());
if invalidation.is_err() {
return Err(ObjectBoundPublicationError::InvalidationFailed);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: Foreign replacements survive cleanup

Descriptor-bound truncation preserves a different file installed under the output name. The dedicated replacement test exercises this identity-drift case.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment on lines +199 to +204
if let Some(forbidden_root) = forbidden_root {
let canonical_forbidden = std::fs::canonicalize(forbidden_root)
.map_err(|_| ObjectBoundPublicationError::ForbiddenRootUnavailable)?;
if canonical_parent.starts_with(canonical_forbidden) {
return Err(ObjectBoundPublicationError::InsideForbiddenRoot);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: Sibling output roots remain valid

Canonical Path::starts_with compares components. A sibling such as /repo-backup remains outside /repo and is not rejected.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment on lines +626 to +644
let record_fd = unsafe {
libc::openat(
directory_file.as_raw_fd(),
record_name.as_ptr(),
libc::O_WRONLY | libc::O_CREAT | libc::O_EXCL | libc::O_CLOEXEC | libc::O_NOFOLLOW,
0o400,
)
};
if record_fd < 0 {
return Err("brew-cleanup-audit-create-failed".into());
}
let mut file = unsafe { std::fs::File::from_raw_fd(record_fd) };

let cleanup = || {
unsafe {
libc::unlinkat(directory_file.as_raw_fd(), record_name.as_ptr(), 0);
}
let _ = directory_file.sync_all();
};

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: Directory replacement cannot redirect records

Both openat and unlinkat use the admitted directory descriptor. Final identity checks reject a renamed directory without touching its replacement.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.

  • Head SHA: fb274c2d1de12459c24da5a093a21301e7d5830e

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.

  • Head SHA: fb274c2d1de12459c24da5a093a21301e7d5830e

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.

  • Head SHA: fb274c2d1de12459c24da5a093a21301e7d5830e

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.

  • Head SHA: fb274c2d1de12459c24da5a093a21301e7d5830e

@seonghobae seonghobae removed the status: draft Draft pull request label Sep 6, 2026
@seonghobae seonghobae added the status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks label Sep 6, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 7, 2026 00:02
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from main to fix/release-artifact-windows-namespace-v1 September 7, 2026 00:05
@seonghobae seonghobae removed the status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks label Sep 7, 2026
@seonghobae seonghobae added the status: draft Draft pull request label Sep 7, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
@seonghobae seonghobae added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 7, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: security Security boundary, hardening, or vulnerability prevention bug Something isn't working priority: high High-priority or P1 work status: draft Draft pull request type: security Security vulnerability or security-specific remediation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant