[seonghobae]

Retired after verified complete successor carryover

• final exact head: 2a0bad1e6c4813a320de5924945772de518130a1
• protected base: develop@2949d30718752ea5915c7713ba227e8c19d9e5bf
• ancestry: ordinary two-parent child preserving original chore(a11y): duplicate carried by #1344 #1383 2b380b9e8ffa7d8b9df5526939856510cbbcba9e and protected develop
• relation: 2 ahead / 0 behind / 0 changed files; merge base is the exact protected base
• complete successor: #1344 exact 707ab2e02cdab1f4187b78302abe154afdcf9fed
• rationale/evidence: chore(a11y): duplicate carried by #1344 #1383 (comment)

#1344 preserves the same user-visible Escape hint and programmatic aria-keyshortcuts="Escape" behavior for both console render paths and the index dialog, and adds executable regressions. Fresh exact-head validation is focused 21/21, full 1,091/1,091, diff-whitespace clean, with nine terminal-success hosted workflows. It remains Draft/open with no qualifying approval; this retirement transfers neither approval nor merge readiness.

The alternate Close details (Esc) wording and generated .jules lesson are not independent functionality or security evidence. No force push, destructive rebase, gate weakening, or valid-delta loss occurred.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

중복 writer 정리 전 완전 승계 검증

• 이 PR 원본 exact head: 2b380b9e8ffa7d8b9df5526939856510cbbcba9e
• canonical successor: #1344 exact 707ab2e02cdab1f4187b78302abe154afdcf9fed
• 동일 동작: console 성공/오류 닫기 버튼의 시각적 Escape 힌트와 aria-keyshortcuts="Escape", index dialog의 aria-keyshortcuts="Escape"
• #1344의 추가 보호: tests/test_console_dashboard_security.py, tests/test_dashboard_core.py 실행 회귀
• fresh local exact-head 검증: focused 21/21, full 1,091/1,091, git diff --check 통과
• hosted exact-head: Tests, Security Scan, SAST, Scan path, Pinned HTTPS, OpenSSF, Security Process, Retention, CodeQL PR의 9개 workflow 모두 terminal SUCCESS
• review boundary: unresolved thread 0, qualifying approval 0; #1344는 보호 통합 전 Draft/Proposed 유지

#1383의 Close details (Esc)와 #1344의 Close (Esc) 차이는 별도 기능·보안·접근성 계약이 아니라 같은 Escape 발견성 문구의 표현 차이입니다. #1344가 사용자 가시 동작과 프로그래매틱 ARIA 계약을 모두 보존하며 더 강한 실행 회귀를 제공합니다. 따라서 원본 ancestry를 보존하고 protected tree와 동일한 ordinary two-parent child로 만든 뒤에만 complete-successor-carryover 예외로 종료합니다.

[google-labs-jules]

중복 writer 정리 전 완전 승계 검증

• 이 PR 원본 exact head: 2b380b9e8ffa7d8b9df5526939856510cbbcba9e
• canonical successor: #1344 exact 707ab2e02cdab1f4187b78302abe154afdcf9fed
• 동일 동작: console 성공/오류 닫기 버튼의 시각적 Escape 힌트와 aria-keyshortcuts="Escape", index dialog의 aria-keyshortcuts="Escape"
• #1344의 추가 보호: tests/test_console_dashboard_security.py, tests/test_dashboard_core.py 실행 회귀
• fresh local exact-head 검증: focused 21/21, full 1,091/1,091, git diff --check 통과
• hosted exact-head: Tests, Security Scan, SAST, Scan path, Pinned HTTPS, OpenSSF, Security Process, Retention, CodeQL PR의 9개 workflow 모두 terminal SUCCESS
• review boundary: unresolved thread 0, qualifying approval 0; #1344는 보호 통합 전 Draft/Proposed 유지

#1383의 Close details (Esc)와 #1344의 Close (Esc) 차이는 별도 기능·보안·접근성 계약이 아니라 같은 Escape 발견성 문구의 표현 차이입니다. #1344가 사용자 가시 동작과 프로그래매틱 ARIA 계약을 모두 보존하며 더 강한 실행 회귀를 제공합니다. 따라서 원본 ancestry를 보존하고 protected tree와 동일한 ordinary two-parent child로 만든 뒤에만 complete-successor-carryover 예외로 종료합니다.

외부 인프라 문제(GitHub Actions 계정 잠금 - 결제 이슈)로 인해 CI가 실패하고 있습니다. 이 문제는 코드베이스 수정으로 해결할 수 없습니다. 계정 결제 문제를 해결한 후 CI를 다시 실행해 주시기 바랍니다.