[seonghobae]

Buyer-visible outcome

Prevents duplicate pointer, Enter, and Space activation of a scan-history row while its asynchronous detail request is pending. The row remains focusable and exposes aria-busy plus aria-disabled; success, failure, stale completion, or Escape restores only the current row state.

Exact authority

• protected base: develop@2949d30718752ea5915c7713ba227e8c19d9e5bf
• original implementation head: 90bde706088ffa0a3380c7ef2c28681d612f6198
• first regression head: c026a4f72c1bf9de1e9d687e134a5d556fbd01bc
• repaired regression head: eaea564c53f3b4f7d1bd01086f0e311fe949d6ac
• current exact head: 21b92ac8c6e048685734bf85c704deb601589b1d
• exact tree: 548065034ae313103e4c68c56bb456bb300607f5
• exact regression blob: 2ed63cb92d61ffecfa74ba71e1969546b1913189
• current relation: one ordinary source-neutral child ahead of eaea564..., zero behind, zero changed files
• lifecycle: Draft / open / mergeable

Root cause and bounded repair

pointer-events: none alone does not prevent keyboard activation, and <tr> has no native disabled state. The production change therefore uses a synchronous aria-disabled guard in both click and Enter/Space handlers, sets the state before awaiting the API, and removes it only when the row's detailRequest still matches the completing request. Escape invalidates the request, clears busy/disabled state, and restores focus.

The first candidate changed this behavior without a regression. The first test child failed on both Python 3.11 and 3.13 after counting two tr.removeAttribute calls even though Escape correctly clears lastDetailFocus and request settlement clears tr. Exact logs reported 1 failed / 1,091 passed. The ordinary repair independently requires lastDetailFocus.removeAttribute and tr.removeAttribute. No production abstraction or dependency was added. Current head 21b92ac... is a source-neutral preservation child of the repaired tree.

Test-first and exact-log evidence

• RED against protected develop: four new disabled-state assertions fail; the existing request-identity assertion passes
• GREEN source contract against implementation: pointer/keyboard guards, pending CSS/ARIA, Escape cleanup, settlement cleanup, and request identity are present
• failed hosted head c026a4f...: Python 3.11 and 3.13 each report exactly 1 failed / 1,091 passed at the incorrect cleanup-count assertion
• current exact head: Tests 36881388166, Security Scan 36881388150, SAST 36881388234, Security Process 36881388158, Retention 36881388553, OpenSSF 36881388239, Pinned HTTPS 36881388243, and Scan path 36881388313 are terminal SUCCESS
• CodeQL 36881388246 completed/skipped; qualifying approval is 0 and unresolved threads are 0

Delivery gate

Keep Draft until successful CodeQL settlement where required and qualifying independent review. No Force Push, destructive rebase, self-approval, gate weakening, merge, tag, or release.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 68562a40-e207-407d-b3bf-a5df78a49900

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2949d30 and 90bde70.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .jules/palette.md
• scanner/dashboard/console.html

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

상세 요청 중 스캔 행의 클릭과 키보드 입력을 차단하고 비활성 상태를 표시합니다. 요청 완료 또는 상세 창 닫기 시 비활성 상태를 해제합니다.

Changes

스캔 행 상호작용

Layer / File(s)	Summary
상세 요청 중 행 비활성화 및 복구 .jules/palette.md, scanner/dashboard/console.html	상세 요청 시작 시 aria-disabled="true"를 설정하고, 클릭 및 Enter/Space 입력에서 비활성 행의 요청을 중단합니다. 요청 완료 또는 상세 창 닫기 시 속성을 제거합니다. CSS는 비활성 행의 포인터 입력을 차단하고 불투명도를 낮춥니다. 팔레트 지침에 이 처리 방식이 추가되었습니다.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 90bde

Rows reject repeated activation while details load and recover after requests finish, including failures. No concrete merge-blocking risk was identified.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to 90bde

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: scanner

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

• observed — scanner (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

• observed — Modified behavior in scanner/dashboard/console.html: aria-disabled="true"인 스캔 행의 포인터 입력을 막고 불투명도를 낮추는 스타일을 추가했습니다.
• observed — Modified behavior in scanner/dashboard/console.html: 상세 창을 닫을 때 마지막 포커스 대상에서 aria-disabled를 제거하도록 했습니다.
• observed — Modified behavior in scanner/dashboard/console.html: 스캔 행의 클릭 및 Enter/Space 처리에서 aria-disabled="true"이면 상세 요청을 중단하도록 했습니다. 기존 처리에는 이 차단 검사가 없었습니다.
• observed — Modified behavior in scanner/dashboard/console.html: 상세 요청 시작 시 해당 스캔 행에 aria-disabled="true"를 설정하도록 했습니다.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 비동기 로딩 중 인터랙티브 테이블 행을 비활성화하는 주요 변경 사항을 정확하고 구체적으로 설명합니다.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Missing regression repaired on the existing writer branch.

• exact head c026a4f72c1bf9de1e9d687e134a5d556fbd01bc
• tree 9c89fe31f8336ad23eb40336c354657a1be63eb8
• test blob 7fab68b5adfb7951e30692ee2e5151137c30ef20
• ordinary child of 90bde706088ffa0a3380c7ef2c28681d612f6198; force:false
• RED on protected source: 4 disabled-state assertions fail / 1 existing request-identity assertion passes
• GREEN on implementation source: 5/5 assertions pass

The test is intentionally added to the existing console detail-loading contract; no duplicate UI abstraction or dependency was introduced. Fresh exact-head hosted Checks and independent review remain required, so the PR stays Draft.

[seonghobae]

Exact-log RCA and test-only repair:

• failed head c026a4f72c1bf9de1e9d687e134a5d556fbd01bc: Tests 36880717787
• both Python 3.11 and 3.13: 1 failed / 1,091 passed
• failing assertion expected two tr.removeAttribute("aria-disabled") calls
• production correctly uses lastDetailFocus.removeAttribute for Escape and tr.removeAttribute for request settlement
• repaired head eaea564c53f3b4f7d1bd01086f0e311fe949d6ac
• tree 548065034ae313103e4c68c56bb456bb300607f5
• regression blob 2ed63cb92d61ffecfa74ba71e1969546b1913189

The ordinary force:false child changes only the test identity and separately asserts both cleanup paths. Fresh exact-head Checks are required; Draft remains.

[google-labs-jules]

Missing regression repaired on the existing writer branch.

• exact head c026a4f72c1bf9de1e9d687e134a5d556fbd01bc
• tree 9c89fe31f8336ad23eb40336c354657a1be63eb8
• test blob 7fab68b5adfb7951e30692ee2e5151137c30ef20
• ordinary child of 90bde706088ffa0a3380c7ef2c28681d612f6198; force:false
• RED on protected source: 4 disabled-state assertions fail / 1 existing request-identity assertion passes
• GREEN on implementation source: 5/5 assertions pass

The test is intentionally added to the existing console detail-loading contract; no duplicate UI abstraction or dependency was introduced. Fresh exact-head hosted Checks and independent review remain required, so the PR stays Draft.

Acknowledged. Thanks for providing the test updates on the writer branch to verify the fix.

[google-labs-jules]

Exact-log RCA and test-only repair:

• failed head c026a4f72c1bf9de1e9d687e134a5d556fbd01bc: Tests 36880717787
• both Python 3.11 and 3.13: 1 failed / 1,091 passed
• failing assertion expected two tr.removeAttribute("aria-disabled") calls
• production correctly uses lastDetailFocus.removeAttribute for Escape and tr.removeAttribute for request settlement
• repaired head eaea564c53f3b4f7d1bd01086f0e311fe949d6ac
• tree 548065034ae313103e4c68c56bb456bb300607f5
• regression blob 2ed63cb92d61ffecfa74ba71e1969546b1913189

The ordinary force:false child changes only the test identity and separately asserts both cleanup paths. Fresh exact-head Checks are required; Draft remains.

Acknowledged. I've updated the test_console_detail_loading_contract.py regression test locally to separately assert both tr.removeAttribute("aria-disabled"); and lastDetailFocus.removeAttribute("aria-disabled"); matching your repair. Tests pass locally now.

[seonghobae]

최종 exact-head 재검증 결과입니다.

• 현재 head: 21b92ac8c6e048685734bf85c704deb601589b1d
• tree: 548065034ae313103e4c68c56bb456bb300607f5
• regression blob: 2ed63cb92d61ffecfa74ba71e1969546b1913189
• eaea564... 대비: ordinary child 1 ahead / 0 behind / 0 changed files
• 8개 non-CodeQL workflow: 모두 terminal SUCCESS
• CodeQL 36881388246: completed/skipped
• review approval 0 / unresolved thread 0

첫 회귀 head c026a4f...의 양 Python job은 잘못된 cleanup 식별자 count 때문에 각각 1 failed / 1,091 passed였습니다. production 결함이 아니므로 구현은 건드리지 않고, Escape의 lastDetailFocus cleanup과 request-settlement의 tr cleanup을 별도로 검증했습니다. 현 head는 검증된 repaired tree를 source-neutral하게 보존합니다.

CodeQL 성공 판정과 독립 승인이 없으므로 Draft를 유지하며 merge/release하지 않습니다.

[google-labs-jules]

최종 exact-head 재검증 결과입니다.

• 현재 head: 21b92ac8c6e048685734bf85c704deb601589b1d
• tree: 548065034ae313103e4c68c56bb456bb300607f5
• regression blob: 2ed63cb92d61ffecfa74ba71e1969546b1913189
• eaea564... 대비: ordinary child 1 ahead / 0 behind / 0 changed files
• 8개 non-CodeQL workflow: 모두 terminal SUCCESS
• CodeQL 36881388246: completed/skipped
• review approval 0 / unresolved thread 0

첫 회귀 head c026a4f...의 양 Python job은 잘못된 cleanup 식별자 count 때문에 각각 1 failed / 1,091 passed였습니다. production 결함이 아니므로 구현은 건드리지 않고, Escape의 lastDetailFocus cleanup과 request-settlement의 tr cleanup을 별도로 검증했습니다. 현 head는 검증된 repaired tree를 source-neutral하게 보존합니다.

CodeQL 성공 판정과 독립 승인이 없으므로 Draft를 유지하며 merge/release하지 않습니다.

확인했습니다. 모든 non-CodeQL 워크플로우가 성공적으로 완료되었고 수정된 회귀 테스트가 정상 작동함을 확인해주셔서 감사합니다. 추가 작업 없이 CI 검증 대기를 유지하겠습니다.