Skip to content

feat(analysis): send execute exchanges over tepp-loopback TCP - #382

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/scientific-acceptance-execute-consumer-exchange-gap-003afrom
feat/scientific-acceptance-execute-exchange-loopback-tcp-gap-003a
Closed

feat(analysis): send execute exchanges over tepp-loopback TCP#382
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/scientific-acceptance-execute-consumer-exchange-gap-003afrom
feat/scientific-acceptance-execute-exchange-loopback-tcp-gap-003a

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Consolidation decision — closed with retired scientific execute exchange

This PR is not merged. Exact head bf45147ffc32f0024ff519c49311823fe664562c renders the now-retired #381 scientific execute exchange over loopback TCP; #381 and its #356/#370 authority chain are closed.

Preserve only the generic transport evidence for fold into #166: loopback host validation, HTTPS-origin preservation, typed HTTP/1.1 rendering, socket fail-closed behavior and consumer-isolation tests. Reapply those tests to the corrected Validation Evidence execute exchange after its domain contract exists.

A TCP transport cannot make an invalid scientific result authoritative. Branch, tests and review history remain available as implementation lineage.

Render typed naruon and LineageWeave scientific-acceptance execute
exchanges onto the spawned tepp-loopback listener so POST /execute is
published consumer HTTP without embedding the library. Public bind
hosts and localhost fail closed.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant