Add --branch-coverage flag to respect partial branch coverage

CHANGELOG

@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+Unreleased
+
+* Add --branch-coverage flag to diff-cover to treat partially covered branches in Cobertura XML reports as uncovered
+
+
 05/30/2026 v10.3.0
 
 * Add --show-covered flag to highlight covered diff lines in HTML report [PR 600](https://github.com/Bachmann1234/diff_cover/pull/600) Thanks @duxiaocheng

diff_cover/diff_cover_tool.py

@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
 EXPAND_COVERAGE_REPORT = (
     "Append missing lines in coverage reports based on the hits of the previous line."
 )
+BRANCH_COVERAGE_HELP = (
+    "Treat partially covered branches as uncovered. Requires a coverage report "
+    'with branch coverage data (Cobertura branch="true" condition-coverage).'
+)
 INCLUDE_UNTRACKED_HELP = "Include untracked files"
 CONFIG_FILE_HELP = "The configuration file to use"
 DIFF_FILE_HELP = "The diff file to use"
@@ -117,6 +121,13 @@ def parse_coverage_args(argv):
         help=EXPAND_COVERAGE_REPORT,
     )
 
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--branch-coverage",
+        action="store_true",
+        default=None,
+        help=BRANCH_COVERAGE_HELP,
+    )
+
     parser.add_argument(
         "--external-css-file",
         metavar="FILENAME",
@@ -215,6 +226,7 @@ def parse_coverage_args(argv):
         "diff_range_notation": "...",
         "quiet": False,
         "expand_coverage_report": False,
+        "branch_coverage": False,
         "total_percent_float": False,
     }
 
@@ -237,6 +249,7 @@ def generate_coverage_report(
     show_uncovered=False,
     show_covered=False,
     expand_coverage_report=False,
+    branch_coverage=False,
     total_percent_float=False,
 ):
     """
@@ -265,7 +278,9 @@ def generate_coverage_report(
     if xml_roots and lcov_roots:
         raise ValueError("Mixing LCov and XML reports is not supported yet")
     if xml_roots:
-        coverage = XmlCoverageReporter(xml_roots, src_roots, expand_coverage_report)
+        coverage = XmlCoverageReporter(
+            xml_roots, src_roots, expand_coverage_report, branch_coverage
+        )
     else:
         coverage = LcovCoverageReporter(lcov_roots, src_roots)
 
@@ -417,6 +432,7 @@ def main(argv=None, directory=None):
         show_uncovered=arg_dict["show_uncovered"],
         show_covered=arg_dict["show_covered"],
         expand_coverage_report=arg_dict["expand_coverage_report"],
+        branch_coverage=arg_dict["branch_coverage"],
         total_percent_float=arg_dict["total_percent_float"],
     )
 

diff_cover/violationsreporters/violations_reporter.py

@@ -24,7 +24,13 @@
     Query information from a Cobertura|Clover|JaCoCo XML coverage report.
     """
 
-    def __init__(self, xml_roots, src_roots=None, expand_coverage_report=False):
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        xml_roots,
+        src_roots=None,
+        expand_coverage_report=False,
+        branch_coverage=False,
+    ):
         """
         Load the XML coverage report represented
         by the cElementTree with root element `xml_root`.
@@ -42,6 +48,11 @@
 
         self._src_roots = src_roots or [""]
         self._expand_coverage_report = expand_coverage_report
+        self._branch_coverage = branch_coverage
+
+        # Pulls the "(covered/total)" pair out of Cobertura's
+        # condition-coverage attribute, e.g. "50% (1/2)".
+        self._cobertura_condition_coverage_re = re.compile(r"\((\d+)/(\d+)\)")
 
     def _get_xml_classes(self, xml_document):
         """
@@ -239,23 +250,19 @@
                                     {_hits: last_hit_number, _number: line_number}
                                 )
 
-                # First case, need to define violations initially
-                if violations is None:
-                    violations = {
-                        Violation(int(line.get(_number)), None)
-                        for line in line_nodes
-                        if int(line.get(_hits, 0)) == 0
-                    }
+                new_violations = {
+                    Violation(int(line.get(_number)), None)
+                    for line in line_nodes
+                    if self._is_violation(line, _hits)
+                }
 
-                # If we already have a violations set,
-                # take the intersection of the new
-                # violations set and its old self
+                # The first report defines the violations set. Each subsequent
+                # report narrows it, since we only keep violations that show up
+                # in every report.
+                if violations is None:
+                    violations = new_violations
                 else:
-                    violations = violations & {
-                        Violation(int(line.get(_number)), None)
-                        for line in line_nodes
-                        if int(line.get(_hits, 0)) == 0
-                    }
+                    violations = violations & new_violations
 
                 # Measured is the union of itself and the new measured
                 measured = measured | {int(line.get(_number)) for line in line_nodes}
@@ -267,6 +274,29 @@
 
             self._info_cache[src_path] = (violations, measured)
 
+    def _is_violation(self, line, hits_attr):
+        """
+        Return whether a coverage `line` node counts as a violation.
+
+        A line is a violation if it was never executed, or -- when branch
+        coverage is enabled -- if it is a partially covered branch.
+        """
+        if int(line.get(hits_attr, 0)) == 0:
+            return True
+        return self._branch_coverage and self._is_partial_branch(line)
+
+    def _is_partial_branch(self, line):
+        """Return whether a Cobertura `line` node is a partially covered branch."""
+        if line.get("branch") != "true":
+            return False
+        match = self._cobertura_condition_coverage_re.search(
+            line.get("condition-coverage", "")
+        )
+        if not match:
+            return False
+        covered, total = int(match.group(1)), int(match.group(2))
+        return covered < total
+
     def violations(self, src_path):
         """
         See base class comments.

tests/test_diff_cover_tool.py

@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@ def test_show_covered_flag():
     assert arg_dict["show_covered"] is True
 
 
+def test_branch_coverage_defaults_false():
+    arg_dict = parse_coverage_args(["reports/coverage.xml"])
+    assert arg_dict["branch_coverage"] is False
+
+
+def test_branch_coverage_flag():
+    arg_dict = parse_coverage_args(["reports/coverage.xml", "--branch-coverage"])
+    assert arg_dict["branch_coverage"] is True
+
+
 def test_parse_with_multiple_reports():
     argv = [
         "reports/coverage.xml",

tests/test_violations_reporter.py

@@ -333,6 +333,75 @@ def test_expand_unreported_lines_without_measured(self):
 
         assert set() == coverage.violations("file1.java")
 
+    def test_partial_branch_is_violation_when_branch_coverage_enabled(self):
+        # A line that executed (hits=1) but only exercised 1 of its 2
+        # branches. With branch coverage enabled this should count as a
+        # violation, even though the statement itself ran.
+        xml = etree.fromstring("""<?xml version="1.0"?>
+            <coverage>
+                <packages><classes>
+                    <class filename="file1.py">
+                        <lines>
+                            <line number="1" hits="1"/>
+                            <line number="2" hits="1" branch="true"
+                                  condition-coverage="50% (1/2)"/>
+                            <line number="3" hits="1" branch="true"
+                                  condition-coverage="100% (2/2)"/>
+                        </lines>
+                    </class>
+                </classes></packages>
+            </coverage>
+            """)
+
+        coverage = XmlCoverageReporter([xml], branch_coverage=True)
+
+        # Line 2 is a partially covered branch -> violation.
+        # Line 3 is a fully covered branch, line 1 a plain statement -> covered.
+        assert coverage.violations("file1.py") == {Violation(2, None)}
+        assert coverage.measured_lines("file1.py") == {1, 2, 3}
+
+    def test_partial_branch_ignored_by_default(self):
+        # Without branch coverage enabled, an executed-but-partially-covered
+        # branch stays covered, preserving the historical behaviour.
+        xml = etree.fromstring("""<?xml version="1.0"?>
+            <coverage>
+                <packages><classes>
+                    <class filename="file1.py">
+                        <lines>
+                            <line number="1" hits="1"/>
+                            <line number="2" hits="1" branch="true"
+                                  condition-coverage="50% (1/2)"/>
+                        </lines>
+                    </class>
+                </classes></packages>
+            </coverage>
+            """)
+
+        coverage = XmlCoverageReporter([xml])
+
+        assert coverage.violations("file1.py") == set()
+        assert coverage.measured_lines("file1.py") == {1, 2}
+
+    def test_uncovered_branch_line_is_single_violation(self):
+        # A line that is both never executed (hits=0) and a partial branch is
+        # reported once, not twice.
+        xml = etree.fromstring("""<?xml version="1.0"?>
+            <coverage>
+                <packages><classes>
+                    <class filename="file1.py">
+                        <lines>
+                            <line number="1" hits="0" branch="true"
+                                  condition-coverage="0% (0/2)"/>
+                        </lines>
+                    </class>
+                </classes></packages>
+            </coverage>
+            """)
+
+        coverage = XmlCoverageReporter([xml], branch_coverage=True)
+
+        assert coverage.violations("file1.py") == {Violation(1, None)}
+
     def _coverage_xml(self, file_paths, violations, measured, source_paths=None):
         """
         Build an XML tree with source files specified by `file_paths`.