intent: portable-control-plane-core - #150
Conversation
Deploying ystack with
|
| Latest commit: |
077aee3
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://c02550c9.fabrica-6yx.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://ystack-intent-portable-contr.fabrica-6yx.pages.dev |
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 992610d407
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| ## Proposed outcome | ||
|
|
||
| ystack has a small, vendor-neutral core that defines artifacts, stage results, | ||
| risk gates, evidence, and adapter capabilities. A selected profile supplies the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Compliance: If G1 accepts this wording, the first initiative can design risk-gate behavior and evidence rather than only their portable contract fields. ROADMAP.md:251-257 gives each rollout item its own artifact chain and assigns risk gates and immutable evidence to the second, control-foundation initiative; the portable core is limited to contracts, capability manifests, profile resolution, fake adapters, and contract tests. Limit this outcome to the risk and evidence fields needed by those contracts, leaving gate behavior and immutable evidence to the next initiative.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L10-L15
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 077aee3. The intent now limits this initiative to artifact/stage-result contracts, risk metadata, evidence references, capability declarations, profile resolution, fake adapters, and structural contract validation. It explicitly leaves risk-gate behavior, immutable evidence, capability proof/enforcement, and real-adapter qualification to the later control and eval initiatives. Issue #149 was narrowed to match.
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
1 participant
G1 — acceptance gate.
This intent turns the portable AI-native SDLC direction from #148 into one bounded design initiative. It asks only for portable contracts, risk metadata, evidence references, capability declarations, profile resolution, fake adapters, and structural contract tests. It keeps the current Claude Code + Codex + GitHub profile working and does not enable new autonomous writes.
Please check that these read as your intent:
The open questions are limited to contract shape. Merging this PR accepts the problem and outcome into design. It does not approve a spec or implementation.
Verified on 077aee3:
Closes #149