Add managed lifecycle and persistent daemon - #41
Draft
wolfiesch wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Introduce receipt-owned transactional install/update/rollback/uninstall, crash recovery and cross-process locking, plus a persistent Core daemon with a reconnectable native relay and best-effort per-user service management.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Chrome owns the lifetime of a Native Messaging process, so service-worker suspension, extension reloads, and native-port churn currently tear down Core IPC, runtime state, and in-flight scheduling. The release lifecycle also needs exact managed update, rollback, uninstall, pruning, and crash recovery before the runtime can be treated as durable infrastructure.
What changed
agenttab-host daemonplus a small reconnectableagenttab-nativerelayagenttab doctorto distinguish installation, IPC, protocol, host, and extension failuresReview decisions
Validation
Exact-head CI run #175 passed:
Why draft
This is a substantial operational architecture change. The low-friction fallback is deliberate, but the persistent-process model, lifecycle semantics, platform service behavior, and explicit Windows durability boundary deserve maintainer review before merge.