Scope task actors and handoff concurrency - #40
Draft
wolfiesch wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
The current ownership scheduler is intentionally conservative, but its global barriers make independent tasks block each other. Numeric Chrome tab IDs and cosmetic tab groups also need stronger lifecycle semantics if AgentTab is going to run several unattended actors safely and efficiently.
What changes
Review decisions
chrome.storage.sessionintentionally revokes persisted ownership instead of guessing that reused tab IDs are safe.Validation
Remaining review risks
Why draft
This changes task authority, close semantics, and concurrency ordering across the extension and Core. It is implementation-complete but should be approved as an architectural choice and soaked under real multi-agent workloads.