Generate protocol catalogs and negotiate compatibility - #37
Draft
wolfiesch wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
wolfiesch
force-pushed
the
review/protocol-codegen
branch
from
August 31, 2026 01:32
c378093 to
778f97f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
AgentTab currently has duplicated protocol knowledge across Rust, the extension, and both SDKs. That makes compatibility drift easy and upgrades brittle—especially when an unattended client and host do not update at the same time.
What changes
protocol/agenttab-v1.jsoncatalog and generated Rust, TypeScript, Python, and extension constants/types.Review decisions
Validation
Why draft
This changes the project-wide compatibility contract and generated-code workflow. The branch is implementation-complete, but the policy and maintenance model deserve explicit review before merge.