Skip to content

feat(opening): bound affine binder messages - #72

Open
windsornguyen wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/four-axis-affine-foldfrom
codex/affine-binding-cardinality
Open

feat(opening): bound affine binder messages#72
windsornguyen wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/four-axis-affine-foldfrom
codex/affine-binding-cardinality

Conversation

@windsornguyen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Explain what this changes, why it is needed, and anything reviewers should
verify. Link an issue when one exists.

What does this change?

Proves that any deterministic no-response decoder covering every solution of one binary affine equation on n + 1 coordinates needs at least 2^n messages, hence at least n message bits. The coverage hypothesis excludes structured subsets and later interaction.

How was it tested?

  • lake build --wfail passes on stacked tip 16b7318
  • lake lint passes on stacked tip 16b7318
  • No sorry or new axioms, or this PR does not change Lean proofs
  • git diff --check passes
  • The cardinality and binary-length corollaries compile

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b2d4a0e71f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +47 to +49
If a finite message decoder represents every solution of one binary affine
equation on `n + 1` coordinates, its message space contains at least `2^n`
elements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge State the nonzero-pivot assumption

For an affine equation whose entire linear part is zero, the solution set has either no elements or 2^(n + 1) elements, rather than the asserted 2^n; completeWord avoids this case by implicitly fixing the pivot coefficient to 1. Consequently, this theorem covers only normalized equations with a chosen nonzero pivot, not every binary affine equation as its public contract claims. State that assumption explicitly here, or model the full coefficient vector and require the selected pivot coefficient to be nonzero.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L21-L22

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant