[efraespada]

Fixes #850.

An SDD draft below the existing 1,800-code-point minimum surfaced as generic retryable workflow.failed. The draft boundary now classifies only the exact typed Markdown minimum rejection and returns nonretryable validation.invalid-input with a closed response-stage cause, minimum and actual host attempt. A discarded adapter response has an explicitly unavailable count; a returned string has a measured Unicode code-point count. The original consumer response, length and provider root cause remain unknown.

The existing preparation card, terminal and API share validated safe facts and English/Spanish recovery guidance. Authors can clarify that the issue requires a complete proposed Markdown document and retry its normal workflow. Rejected content is never published or included in diagnostics. Answers and ownership survive the failed attempt; freshness, source binding, replay and publication fences remain. Maximum/format repair keeps its existing two-query ceiling; minimum, malformed-schema and provider failures authorize no new content repair.

Local acceptance passes: 891 Jest suites / 17,429 tests, with 35 existing skips; 83 new distinct cases against a 40-case budget; and 267 extension tests with all four coverage metrics at 100%. The regressions exercise the real adapter and ordinary Issue/Issue Comment routes, including retained answers/owner, no publication, stale-card protection and owned-card replay. Existing gate/repair fixtures now satisfy the declared minimum while retaining their original assertions. Full-suite LCOV hits 52/52 modified coverable lines without misses or partials against 6bd590da; this is not yet official Codecov evidence.

The focused SDD, primary gate, catalog and operator/error-reference docs are aligned. Types, lint, specification/catalog, documentation/navigation, workflow contracts and AST-only Graphify update pass. Full coverage budgets pass; the 14 preexisting human setup acceptances remain open. The four bundles and public declaration closure are regenerated. The actual 98-file npm tarball passes CLI, typed API and isolated web smoke; a separate tarball fixture checks the new descriptor's types, serialization and invalid-field rejection. These observations do not constitute an original-consumer rerun or live model qualification.

Remote gates remain required for the exact published head and live base: all applicable checks/platforms, complete review with no open findings/threads, and official Codecov 100% modified lines with zero misses or partials. The single base coverage refresh 41750686572 passes at 6bd590da. No release, deployment, schema reduction or review bypass is included.

[docs-page]

To preview the documentation for this pull request, visit the following URL:

docs.page/vypdev/copilot~881

Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page

[vypbot]

Bugbot: review complete

Current status: No active findings on 8b9b7e1.

Pull request · Verified commit · Workflow run

[vypbot]

Copilot approval · Human review needed

Status: A protected workflow, policy, or trust-boundary file changed.
Completed: 1/1 observed checks succeeded; Bugbot complete.
Action required: Ask a human reviewer to decide.
Impact: No new approval is confirmed for this revision.
See checks

Technical evidence

Revision: 8b9b7e1a5a38; base: 6bd590dac62b; reason: protected-path.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.46%. Comparing base (6bd590d) to head (8b9b7e1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #881   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    95.45%   95.46%           
========================================
  Files         1155     1155           
  Lines        38098    38138   +40     
  Branches     11357    11383   +26     
========================================
+ Hits         36368    36409   +41     
  Misses         665      665           
+ Partials      1065     1064    -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...pplication/errors/sdd_draft_preparation_failure.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tion/policies/application_error_message_catalog.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../policies/application_error_presentation_policy.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...cation/policies/sdd_preparation_message_catalog.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...lication/policies/sdd_preparation_status_policy.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tion/usecases/sdd/pre_branch_sdd_draft_workflow.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/data/model/application_error.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/domain/sdd_validation_diagnostic.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.