Skip to content

Re-pin to registry v1.4.1 — second drift in one day - #213

Merged
Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
fix/seam-contract-v1.4.1
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
fix/seam-contract-v1.4.1

Conversation

@Polichinel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Unblocks CI. Same procedure as #212, same outcome.

The Appwrite Seam Contract's registry moved twice today — v1.3.0 → v1.4.0 → v1.4.1. S6's detector caught both.

Re-verified, not just bumped

our declared names 13
changed class at v1.4.1 none
now absent none
added/removed registry-wide none

Upstream change is a register reframing (their D-05 / C-61..C-64) — nothing that reaches a consumer. Pin bumped as a pair, and the commit confirmed an ancestor of main.

One thing recorded rather than acted on

A pin that has to be chased per-PR is a real cost. Two re-pins in one day is not the cadence this check was designed against — S6 assumed a registry that moves occasionally, not hourly.

If views-appwrite stays this active, the check may want to compare a MAJOR/MINOR floor rather than an exact version, so a patch-level reframing upstream doesn't turn this repo red. That is a design decision about how tightly the two repos should be coupled, not a bug, so I have written it into ADR-013 where the next person re-pinning will read it rather than changing the check unilaterally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Same procedure as #212, same outcome: our 13 declared names are unchanged in
class and membership at v1.4.1, verified rather than assumed before the pair was
bumped. The upstream change is a register reframing that imposes nothing on
consumers.

Noted in ADR-013 rather than acted on: the registry moved twice today, and a pin
chased per-PR is a real cost. If views-appwrite stays this active, the check may
want a MAJOR/MINOR floor rather than an exact match. That is a decision, not a
fix, so it is recorded where the next person re-pinning will read it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Polichinel
Polichinel merged commit 19dae3f into development Aug 3, 2026
4 checks passed
@Polichinel
Polichinel deleted the fix/seam-contract-v1.4.1 branch August 3, 2026 01:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant