Skip to content

Fix: Correctly handle missing rclone binary in guessBin#16

Closed
insign wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/process-manager-guess-bin-11192536405937360082
Closed

Fix: Correctly handle missing rclone binary in guessBin#16
insign wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/process-manager-guess-bin-11192536405937360082

Conversation

@insign
Copy link
Contributor

@insign insign commented Feb 13, 2026

This PR fixes a bug in ProcessManager::guessBin() where it would silently default to /usr/bin/rclone if the binary was not found, leading to confusing runtime errors later. It now throws a RuntimeException immediately.

It also introduces dependency injection for ExecutableFinder via ProcessManager::setExecutableFinder(), making the binary detection logic testable. A new test suite tests/Unit/ProcessManagerTest.php is added, and tests/Unit/ConfigurationTest.php is updated to mock the binary finder.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11192536405937360082 started by @insign

- Introduce `ProcessManager::setExecutableFinder()` for better testability.
- Fix logic in `guessBin()` to throw `RuntimeException` immediately when rclone is not found, instead of defaulting to `/usr/bin/rclone` (which may not exist).
- Add unit tests for `ProcessManager` to verify binary detection behavior.
- Update `ConfigurationTest` to mock `ExecutableFinder`, ensuring tests pass in environments without rclone.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@insign insign closed this Feb 15, 2026
@insign insign deleted the fix/process-manager-guess-bin-11192536405937360082 branch February 15, 2026 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant