Skip to content

fix: remove private customer artifacts - #479

Merged
aamir merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/remove-customer-artifacts
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

fix: remove private customer artifacts#479
aamir merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/remove-customer-artifacts

Conversation

@aamir

@aamir aamir commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

The public repository no longer carries a customer-specific desktop route or customer-derived examples. This removes the orphaned prototype support and adds fail-closed, redacted release scans so protected terms do not need to be committed to public source.

Scope

  • Remove the customer-specific UI route and its now-unused styles, schemas, scripts, dependency, and CI step.
  • Replace customer-derived fixture names and measured examples with synthetic, workload-neutral values.
  • Scan every tracked and packaged path and file, regardless of extension, using a private term-and-collision policy supplied only by an authorized maintainer.
  • Require that private policy for release scans while keeping ordinary untrusted pull-request CI secret-free.
  • Keep generic benchmark, verifier, trace-export, and eval-authoring behavior unchanged.
  • Fix a literal A2A URL rejected by Rust 1.98 Clippy so required CI can validate the cleanup.

This cleans the current tree only. Existing Git history, old pull-request revisions, branch refs, forks, and cached copies remain outside this change and need a separate repository-replacement or history-cleanup decision.

Validation

  • npm run check — build, typecheck, and 1,312 tests passed.
  • Authorized private current-tree and package release scans passed.
  • bun run build in apps/homescreen passed.
  • cargo +1.98.0 clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings passed.
  • cargo +1.98.0 test — 309 passed, 6 ignored.
  • git diff --check passed.

Devin Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-01T04:23:18.896986Z f6f7c33 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f6f7c330b0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread scripts/public-safety.mjs Outdated
Comment thread scripts/package-smoke.mjs Outdated

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 2 potential issues.

1 flag not posted on this PR by your GitHub settings — view it in Devin Review. (Configure)

Devin Review

Comment thread scripts/public-safety.mjs Outdated
Comment thread scripts/package-smoke.mjs Outdated
aamir added 2 commits August 31, 2026 23:44
- keep collision exemptions in the private maintainer policy\n- fail closed and rerun protected scans before release publication
@aamir
aamir merged commit bc86ac8 into main Sep 1, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant