Skip to content

🧪 Improve test coverage for CLI JSON parsing and execution failures - #17

Closed
undivisible wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-cli-json-parsing-16110011709295730757
Closed

🧪 Improve test coverage for CLI JSON parsing and execution failures#17
undivisible wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-cli-json-parsing-16110011709295730757

Conversation

@undivisible

@undivisible undivisible commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 What: Addressed the testing gap in runZkr CLI error paths by replacing verbose mocked scripts with standard bash commands (echo and false).
📊 Coverage: Covered the CLI failing with a non-zero exit code, and the CLI succeeding but outputting invalid JSON.
Result: plugins/openclaw/cli.ts test coverage is now at 100%, and the tests are much easier to read and maintain.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16110011709295730757 started by @undivisible


Note

Low Risk
Test-only changes with no production code, auth, or data-handling impact.

Overview
Improves runZkr failure-path coverage with simpler, more maintainable tests.

Replaces the temp-script malformed-output case with echo, and adds a new test that uses false to assert non-zero CLI exits are rejected as ZKR_COMMAND_FAILED.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a275f20. Configure here.

Replaced a verbose 15-line test that dynamically generated a mock `zkr` script with two concise tests using standard shell commands (`echo` and `false`). These simple tests successfully trigger the JSON parsing error path and the non-zero exit code error path in `cli.ts`, improving test maintainability and driving coverage to 100%.

Co-authored-by: undivisible <136312656+undivisible@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_b744258d-2c11-4577-9b50-e867279b9013)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by the reviewed and merged integration in #22.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant