You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@raychen911
I would like to kindly ask for some clarification regarding the closure of PR #255 .
I noticed that PR #255 was closed with the note "Closed as related to #92," while both the PR title and description indicate that it "Resolves #91." Additionally, the implementation appears to have addressed the requirements described in #91, and the AI review did not identify any critical issues.
Could you please help clarify the reason for closing PR #255 ? I would also appreciate knowing whether there is a possibility of reopening it or if any further changes are needed from my side before it can proceed with the review process.
Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
@raychen911 I would like to kindly ask for some clarification regarding the closure of PR #255 . I noticed that PR #255 was closed with the note "Closed as related to #92," while both the PR title and description indicate that it "Resolves #91." Additionally, the implementation appears to have addressed the requirements described in #91, and the AI review did not identify any critical issues. Could you please help clarify the reason for closing PR #255 ? I would also appreciate knowing whether there is a possibility of reopening it or if any further changes are needed from my side before it can proceed with the review process. Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
PR #104 was closed earlier today due to a typo in the original description (referenced Issue #6 instead of #91). The description has been corrected to \Closes #91\ and a reopen has been requested. PR #104 implements the full 6-phase pipeline with 111 tests and 38 rounds of AI review resolved. Ready for review.
@raychen911 I would like to kindly ask for some clarification regarding the closure of PR #255 . I noticed that PR #255 was closed with the note "Closed as related to #92," while both the PR title and description indicate that it "Resolves #91." Additionally, the implementation appears to have addressed the requirements described in #91, and the AI review did not identify any critical issues. Could you please help clarify the reason for closing PR #255 ? I would also appreciate knowing whether there is a possibility of reopening it or if any further changes are needed from my side before it can proceed with the review process. Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
@raychen911 I would like to kindly ask for some clarification regarding the closure of PR #255 . I noticed that PR #255 was closed with the note "Closed as related to #92," while both the PR title and description indicate that it "Resolves #91." Additionally, the implementation appears to have addressed the requirements described in #91, and the AI review did not identify any critical issues. Could you please help clarify the reason for closing PR #255 ? I would also appreciate knowing whether there is a possibility of reopening it or if any further changes are needed from my side before it can proceed with the review process. Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
Activity
Adonis-a233 commentedon Jun 30, 2026
已认领本任务
ha0924 commentedon Jun 30, 2026
已认领本任务
Spock12138 commentedon Jun 30, 2026
已认领本任务
xuleiball-lab commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
eternity2026 commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
woshidage77 commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
tianyouyiwang commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
Luwhi commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
MuGuang-L commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
han12580 commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
rhljj commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
Leoluis0705 commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领该任务
neutronstar238 commentedon Jul 1, 2026
已认领本任务
51 remaining items
AsyncKurisu commentedon Aug 2, 2026
@raychen911
I would like to kindly ask for some clarification regarding the closure of PR #255 .
I noticed that PR #255 was closed with the note "Closed as related to #92," while both the PR title and description indicate that it "Resolves #91." Additionally, the implementation appears to have addressed the requirements described in #91, and the AI review did not identify any critical issues.
Could you please help clarify the reason for closing PR #255 ? I would also appreciate knowing whether there is a possibility of reopening it or if any further changes are needed from my side before it can proceed with the review process.
Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
feat(examples): add eval+optimization closed-loop pipeline
raychen911 commentedon Aug 3, 2026
这边重新打开了
coder-mtj commentedon Aug 3, 2026
交付摘要 — trpc-agent-python PR #139
Evaluation + Optimization 闭环流水线(犀牛鸟 issue #91)
1. 任务概述
feat(examples): add evaluation + optimization closed-loop pipeline2. 需求与目标
实现可复现的 Evaluation + Optimization 闭环流水线:
baseline 评估 → 失败归因 → 提示词优化 → 验证集对比(防过拟合)→ 多维 gate 判定 → 带审计追踪的报告输出。全部放在
examples/optimization/eval_optimize_loop/下,不触碰 SDK 代码。3. 交付内容(51 个文件,+12,121 行)
run_pipeline.pybaseline.py+comparator.py|
|
attribution.py| 10 类失败归因,每条带 confidence + detail + evidence ||
optimize.py| AgentOptimizer 集成,带超时保护与候选策略记录 ||
validate.py| 验证集重评、逐 case delta(new_pass / new_fail / unchanged)、过拟合检测 ||
gate.py| 质量 / 成本 / 预算 / 时间 / 场景多维检查,输出 accept / reject / needs review ||
report.py| JSON + Markdown 报告,含 audit trail(seed、耗时、成本、复现命令) ||
tracing.py/config.py/_paths.py| 追踪埋点、统一配置、路径引导 ||
tests/(24 个文件) | 368 个测试全绿 ||
data/+sample_output/| 训练 / 验证集 + 端到端生成好的示例报告 |4. 验收标准达成情况
test_attribution_accuracy.py)test_gate.py、test_decision_accuracy.py)test_pipeline_overfit.py)sample_output/optimization_report.{json,md}5. 测试与 CI
python -m pytest tests/ -q→ 368 passedcases、regression、large-scale、performance、live-mode 等
6. 迭代过程
共约 10 轮 helloopenworld AI review,全部 Critical / Warning 已修复并逐轮重推,主要修复点:
7. 使用方式
feat(examples): add eval+optimization closed-loop pipeline
coder-mtj commentedon Aug 4, 2026
更新交付 — 实现已重投为 PR #284
原 PR #139 因历史重写被 GitHub 永久禁用(无法 reopen),完整实现已重投至 PR #284:
feat(examples): add evaluation + optimization closed-loop pipelineexamples/optimization/eval_optimize_loop/,不触碰 SDK 代码方案设计说明(300–500 字)
失败归因:基于 TraceMatcher 的逐 case 评估,按最终回复不匹配、工具调用错误、参数错误、LLM rubric 不达标、知识召回不足、格式不符等 10 类聚类,每条带 confidence / detail / evidence;对照 gold 表准确率 ≥ 90%。
接受策略:多维 gate(质量 / 成本 / 预算 / 时间 / 场景)输出 accept / reject / needs review,验证集总分提升达阈值且无新增 hard fail 才接受;best_score 口径(SDK vs 模拟)随结果携带,杜绝不可比误判。
防过拟合:优化后必须重跑验证集并逐 case 对比(new_pass / new_fail / unchanged),train 提升 + val 退化显式判定为 overfit 并拒绝;overfit 场景与真实过拟合在报告/审计中区分标注。
产物审计:每轮候选 prompt、评测结果、接受/拒绝理由、运行成本、耗时、随机种子与复现命令全部落盘
optimization_report.{json,md},可复现、可审计。迭代:多轮 AI review 已全部处理,修复涵盖 SDK None 字段归一、路径锚定(holdout/prompt/train/val/output)、比较运算符
=误判、repo-root 含 SDK 校验、live 降级兜底、防过拟合守卫、CI 默认入口冒烟等。请 @raychen911 审阅,谢谢!
coder-mtj commentedon Aug 4, 2026
@raychen911 更新:实现最终在 PR #285(https://github.com/trpc-group/trpc-agent-python/pull/285)。此前 #284 因历史累赘(89 commits)已关闭,重投为 #285 干净单 commit(head
bae2544)。交付状态:CI 8/8 全绿、422 tests pass、最新 AI review 0 Critical。请审阅,谢谢。raychen911 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
已经重新打开
raychen911 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
这边已经在审核,后续耐心等待公布结果
Wsp030914 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
您好,请问可以把我的#244 的也重新打开吗,我这边也是同样问题
raychen911 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
已经打开
raychen911 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
@guocfu 完成任务并获奖
raychen911 commentedon Aug 5, 2026
@quan020406 @wzxsdf @DNKYr @YAO-001 @neutronstar238 @Wsp030914 @rhljj 完成任务
feat: 新增评测-优化自动回归与提示词优化闭环示例 (trpc-group#91)