Build end-to-end iOS Core ML acceptance - #52
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Local verification
Claim boundaries
The CI lane proves Core ML export, app compilation, and XCTest execution on an iOS simulator. It does not claim physical-iPhone latency, Apple Neural Engine placement, or power. The app's physical-device JSON is accepted only when the repository validator confirms a non-simulator iPhone, at least 100 warm runs, matching model/preprocessing hashes, and output drift within tolerance. ANE and power remain
not_measuredunless separate named Instruments/measurement evidence is retained.