Stop keeping a review ledger in the repository - #22
Open
thomaschristopherking wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 59 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Gate: ✅ PASS All files grade A. Full report
|
Mutation testing reportScore: 79.2% (244 killed / 308 tested)
Timeout-prone functionsEach timeout burns its whole budget (
|
The `code-review/` directory held what an automated review cycle had learned about this repository: a ledger of every comment and its verdict, plus the always-flag and never-flag rules a reviewer had to obey. The ledger told a reviewer nothing about the code it sat beside. Nothing reads any of it. No test, script, pre-commit hook or workflow references the directory, so this removes the four files and no more. Signed-off-by: Thomas C. King <thomas.k@transitionzero.org>
thomaschristopherking
changed the base branch from
main
to
issue-116-aemo-expansion-docs
September 11, 2026 09:54
thomaschristopherking
force-pushed
the
chore-drop-review-ledger
branch
from
September 11, 2026 09:54
b0a6980 to
f1153a6
Compare
thomaschristopherking
added this pull request to stack #23
September 11, 2026 09:56
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TL;DR
The
code-review/directory held a ledger of every review comment an automated cycle hadraised, and the flag rules a reviewer had to obey. Nothing reads any of it: no test, script,
pre-commit hook or workflow references the directory.
Last of six for transition-zero/tz-infra-interop#116,
stacked on #21. Unrelated to the capacity-expansion work, so it sits on top where it blocks
nothing below it.
Files to review (3, +0 / -55):
ledger.jsonl,always-flag.md,never-flag.md.Reviewer notes
always-flag.mdheld a rule that documentation must notstate how long a run took, because a reader cannot reproduce a time measured on a machine
they do not know. If you want that kept,
CLAUDE.mdis the natural home and I can move it.added lines, which is why it is worth stopping rather than trimming.