chore: update contracts#63
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ideally, this file should be git ignored -- I can't remember if we had an special reason for not ignoring it
| const mainnetRiverTokenAddress = '0x53319181e003E7f86fB79f794649a2aB680Db244' satisfies Address | ||
| const baseRiverTokenAddress = '0x91930fd11ABAa5241241d3B07c02A8d0B5ac1920' satisfies Address | ||
| const baseGammaSepoliaTokenAddress = '0x24e3123E1b30E041E2df26Da9d6140c5B07Fe4F0' satisfies Address |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in the next @river-build/generated version, we can replace this with values from npm
| address: { | ||
| [mainnet.id]: '0x53319181e003e7f86fb79f794649a2ab680db244', | ||
| [sepolia.id]: '0x40ef1bb984503bb5adef041a88a4f9180e8586f9', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'RiverAuthorizer', | ||
| name: 'Authorizer', | ||
| address: { | ||
| [mainnet.id]: '0x0bEe55b52d01C4D5d4D0cfcE1d6e0baE6722db05', | ||
| [sepolia.id]: '0x2f5E8F6Fb7EcF63d13C13B698d1e0B3EA4Ef604B', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
unsure if that's the most up-to-date address of the authorizer contract - if it is, we should document it in the river docs - only found one reference matching this mainnet address in the river repo (hardcoded in a solidity file - not even inside /contracts or /packages/generated)
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| abi: rewardDistributionAbi, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| plugins: [ | ||
| etherscan({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would love to import abi from npm instead of using etherscan plugin or manually hardcoding abi in this app
1 participant
we probably want to wait the new flow to be ready to merge all together
I'm unsure about the claim flow, since I couldn't test it (I dont have river balance to claim)
Tested delegate & authorize claimer with address zero.