Open
Conversation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In buildLocationList, with basic block sections, we iterate over
every basic block twice to detect section start and end. This is
sub-optimal and shows up as significantly time consuming when
compiling large functions.
This patch uses the set of sections already stored in MBBSectionRanges
and iterates over sections rather than basic blocks.
When detecting if loclists can be merged, the end label of an entry is
matched with the beginning label of the next entry. For the section
corresponding to the entry basic block, this is skipped. This is
because the loc list uses the end label corresponding to the function
whereas the MBBSectionRanges map uses the function end label.
For example:
.Lfunc_begin0:
.file
.loc 0 4 0 # ex2.cc:4:0
.cfi_startproc
.Ltmp0:
#DEBUG_VALUE: test:i <- 7
.loc 0 8 5 prologue_end # ex2.cc:8:5
....
.LBB_END0_0:
.cfi_endproc
.section .text._Z4testv,"ax",@progbits,unique,1
...
.Lfunc_end0:
.size _Z4testv, .Lfunc_end0-_Z4testv
The debug loc uses ".LBB_END0_0" for the end of the section whereas
MBBSectionRanges uses ".Lfunc_end0".
It is alright to skip this as we already check the section corresponding
to the debugloc entry.