Skip to content

Story 5.15: command files cite their specs and come in under budget - #352

Merged
tim-nish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
story/5.15-command-files-cite-their-specs-under-b
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

tim-nish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
story/5.15-command-files-cite-their-specs-under-b

Conversation

@tim-nish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Closes #343. (Dependency 5.14 / #351 merged mid-run — this targets main directly.)

Acceptance criteria mapping

  • AC1 → cites at the morning-gate head, queue-discharge paragraph, PR-delivery head (tanuki-loop.md), and the views/init/target-resolution anchors (tanuki.md); section names verified against the spec's actual headings.
  • AC2 → measured above; outcome reported.
  • AC3 → additive edits only — no instruction removed.
  • AC4 → the sanctioned fork ("copied here, allowed to diverge", owner decision 2026-07-13) untouched.

Review focus

Changed areas

commands/tanuki-loop.md, commands/tanuki.md.

Test plan

Docs-only; full tool suite 79/79 locally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@tim-nish
tim-nish merged commit f031fa6 into main Jul 27, 2026
1 check passed
@tim-nish
tim-nish deleted the story/5.15-command-files-cite-their-specs-under-b branch July 27, 2026 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

hygiene: ~200+ lines of spec text restated (not cited) inside command files

1 participant