Skip to content

Have you considered MediaWiki as the storage layer instead of a markdown folder? #36

Description

@DavidRose333

Hi Anirban — great work on understory, I've been following it closely.

A question from an architectural perspective: have you considered using a MediaWiki instance as the library instead of a plain markdown bundle?

The reason I ask is that MediaWiki already provides several things understory builds by hand:

Native bidirectional page linking
A real search index (free narrowing before the librarian reads anything)
Full revision history on every edit, automatically
Proven scale — it's been running Wikipedia for two decades

The MCP layer already exists too — ProfessionalWiki's MediaWiki MCP Server gives an LLM hands to read, search and write wiki pages directly.

What I haven't found is anyone combining that with the deterministic librarian logic you've built — enrich before create, link both ways, orphan detection. That part would still need porting.

Curious whether you've looked at this, and whether there's a reason the markdown folder was preferred over something more structured.

Thanks for building in the open. Immense respect (from a novice).

Unty Rose

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions