resume data added

[rushi-tekdi]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dc5928bf-3c31-4037-bd13-7480c7e00e19

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds logic to update the resumeData field in the database when a tracking record already exists. The review feedback recommends replacing the raw SQL query with TypeORM's built-in repository update method to improve type safety and maintainability, as well as using modern TypeScript features like the nullish coalescing operator.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

Instead of using raw SQL queries via this.dataSource.query, it is highly recommended to use TypeORM's built-in repository methods (e.g., this.contentTrackingRepository.update). This ensures type safety, better maintainability, and leverages TypeORM's query optimization. Additionally, we can use the nullish coalescing operator (??) and const instead of let for cleaner, modern TypeScript code.

Suggested change

	//update resumeData
	let temp_resumeData=createContentTrackingDto.resumeData ? createContentTrackingDto.resumeData : 0;
	await this.dataSource.query(
	`UPDATE content_tracking set "resumeData"=$2 WHERE "contentTrackingId"=$1`,
	[
	contentTrackingId,
	temp_resumeData
	],
	);
	const resumeData = createContentTrackingDto.resumeData ?? 0;
	await this.contentTrackingRepository.update(contentTrackingId, { resumeData });