Repository navigation
docs: soften three README/METHOD claims the report CSVs do not support - #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Feature families: only red-zone and all three lower the lift beyond week-block noise. The 15+ cancellation is a possibility model.py notes, not a measured fact. The 50+ long rate dipped in 2023 and 2025. Name the live interval as a t interval.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reconciled README.md and METHOD.md against the committed reports at efdf513. Every number, count, period, interval method and Holm family already matched the CSVs. An independent read flagged three conclusions stated more strongly than the evidence:
Also names the live 2026 interval as a t interval. No report, model or data file changes.