Certify the adversarial implementation workflow end to end #299

Activity

1. taras

   added this to the Adversarial implementation workflow milestone on Aug 2, 2026
2. taras commented on Aug 25, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 25, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Certification record — preflight

   Recorded before the tree changed, on a clean checkout created for this gate alone.

   Baseline

   • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head: b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c
   • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 base and merge base: 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e
   • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 is OPEN and draft; this gate does not change that.

   $ git rev-parse HEAD        → b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c
   $ git rev-parse origin/main → 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e
   $ git merge-base HEAD origin/main → 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e
   $ git status --short        → (empty)
   

   Frozen matrix

   The frozen certification matrix is this issue's body as it now stands. It has
   not changed since that body was written, so there is no separate commit
   carrying it.

   Prerequisites present in the recorded target

   • Read complete pull-request review evidence from a workflow #576 — f230e8fd59df293fb9b1677ef4a7466900be4a99 (PR 🔎 Let a workflow read the objections a pull request already holds #580) is an ancestor
     of 170a021d, so it is already in the recorded base;
     packages/workflow/tests/pull-request-read.test.ts is present at the head.
   • Compose the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #301 — the composed consumer is present at the head:
     scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts carries all eight
     AC0–AC7 cases.
   • Deliver answers to suspended workflows for later resumption #300 slice 2 — the PR ⏱️ Let a trusted host decide when the ordinary resume runs #605 merge is the recorded head; packages/cli/src/scheduling.ts
     is present and packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts carries
     SCH1–SCH9.

   scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts is absent at this
   head, as the plan records.

   Clean-worktree preparation

   A dedicated detached worktree at the exact recorded head, prepared once:

   git worktree add --detach /private/tmp/xmd-299-cert b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c
   deno task setup   # preparation only, not certification evidence
   

   No rebase onto a later head was performed, and no other branch is checked out
   there.
3. taras commented on Aug 25, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 25, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Certification record — execution halted, PASS withheld

   Implementation evidence shows CF1 cannot establish its frozen criteria from this
   baseline with the one expected file. Per this issue's own instruction the
   reproducers and their structural consequences are returned to the Planner
   instead of a silently narrowed acceptance, and no feedback commit was
   created — the certification file would have to assert less than the frozen
   matrix says, which is the Planner's call.

   Full write-up with exact reproducers, causes and line references:
   issue-299-planner-handback.md (probe files preserved in .probe-299/).

   Baseline held throughout

   HEAD b0c31e20…, origin/main 170a021d…, merge base 170a021d…, clean tree.
   A detached worktree at that head, prepared once with deno task setup;
   deno task build exit 0.

   What the evidence does establish

   The complete supervised workflow runs black-box, through real CLI processes,
   on both entrypoints, and reaches acceptance. The shipped
   workflows/adversarial-implementation/start.md and its five shipped stages,
   copied byte-for-byte into a committed fixture repository, run under
   xmd workflow start against a private run store, a disposable bare remote and a
   loopback GitHub — exit 0 and the authored # Accepted report on the Deno
   source row and on the compiled dist/xmd row, in authored order:
   discovery → handoff checkpoint → plan → plan verdict → plan checkpoint →
   authorization checkpoint → observation → proposal → <Evaluate> mutation →
   Git.Add/Git.Commit → Git.Push → PullRequest → all three review reads →
   implementation verdict → review checkpoint → acceptance checkpoint.

   Three reusable harness mechanisms are proven: a certification-owned ACP agent
   reached through ACPX's name→command resolution and a PATH shim; the Agent
   profile observed from outside the run (mcpServers: [], allowedTools: [],
   workflow system prompt, an empty provider-owned cwd — no Workspace, no
   checkout, no host path); and a git shim that bridges the github.com locator
   the Git-host adapters require to the disposable bare repository, which is the
   process-boundary form of Tier AC's forgeHost.

   Blocker 1 — <Elicit> never suspends through either shipped entrypoint

   A workflow run reaching an <Elicit> opens a loopback browser form and blocks:
   it publishes no suspension request, never settles suspended, never exits 2.

   $ xmd workflow start --id=top-run top.md
   workflow run: top-run
   http://127.0.0.1:51413/f/VIl2tbHy8AnTCVq_M1S4dliPq5_jnP5-eX37KoihQZc/
   … abandoned after 45s; the run is left `interrupted`
   

   Cause: cli.ts runs the document through
   execution.around(runScopedDocument(…, { testing: false, … })), and
   runScopedDocument is scoped(…) — so installWebElicitation() lands in a
   scope nested inside host.attach(), where useWorkflowElicitation()
   installed the suspending provider at { at: "min" }. The nested provider
   answers first, the way <Answers> does. elicitation.ts's comment assumed the
   opposite nesting.

   Uncaught because every suspension suite drives the executor in-process (WFS/CKX
   says "no subprocess is needed"; the CLI suites make a suspended run with a
   test-only <Wait /> calling suspendFor() directly), so none installs the CLI
   document components that break it.

   Consequence: CF1 cannot perform authorization-through-a-user-decision or
   continuation black-box; it completes only on the branch where every checkpoint
   reports requiresUser: false.

   Blocker 2 — the shipped observation instruction is refused by the shipped ceiling

   Implementation.md:213 tells the implementor to answer with
   {"kind":"observation","source":"<File path=\"README.md\" as=\"readme\" />"}
   and :216 states an observation may use <File path=... as=... />. Core
   refuses it (generated-xmd.ts:154):

   a generated fragment binds a result with `as`, which it may not.
   workflow status: failed
   

   Dropping as — the spelling the WAL fixture teaches — admits and the run
   continues to acceptance. Uncaught because Tier AC passes observations: [] in
   every scenario and never sends one.

   Consequence: CF1's "generated observations" leg is unperformable by a compliant
   implementor. The fix is a workflow-document fix, which this gate excludes.

   Blocker 3 — the configured issue endpoint is validated and then dropped

   With XMD_WORKFLOW_GITHUB_ISSUES={"ceiling":[…],"endpoint":"http://127.0.0.1:PORT"}
   an <Issue> upsert reaches that endpoint zero times and the run fails "the issue
   tracker is temporarily unavailable".

   github-issues-config.ts parses and returns {ceiling, endpoint} and names that
   shape in its own error message; GitHubIssuesOptions
   (issue/github.ts:300) has no endpoint, and useGitHubIssues builds
   options.access ?? denoGitHubSource() (line 324) — https://api.github.com.
   The member survives type-checking because it arrives through a spread. The
   pull-request sibling honours options.endpoint (pull-request-reads.ts:274).

   Beyond certification: a deployment pointing issues at GitHub Enterprise is
   silently talking to api.github.com.

   Consequence: CF1's "Issue handling" leg has no host-reachable seam black-box.

   Not probed

   CF2, CF4, CF5 and CF6 were not driven end to end — CF1 is the shared fixture
   they build on and its shape is now a Planner decision. Nothing so far suggests a
   further blocker in them.

   Decisions this needs

   1. Whether the three defects are fixed before certification resumes, and in
      which stack (two production-source fixes, one workflow-document fix; none is
      the Implementor's to make under this issue's scope boundary).
   2. Whether CF1's frozen assertion changes if any is deliberately left standing.
   3. Whether the proven harness design is accepted as the shape of the one
      expected file, so the next round writes CF1–CF6 against it.
4. taras commented on Aug 25, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 25, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Addendum — Blocker 4: a killed run does not resume past a retained Agent turn

   The previous comment said CF2 was unprobed and that nothing suggested a further
   blocker there. That claim has now been tested rather than assumed, and it was
   wrong: C2 is unmet as written.

   SIGKILL a workflow run after an Agent turn has committed, then resume:

   $ xmd workflow resume agent-probe
   workflow run: agent-probe
   Divergence: workflow root terminated after 4 yields, but journal has 6 yield entries
   workflow status: failed
   

   The whole reproducing document (.probe-299/agent-resume.test.ts):

   <Agent name="cert-agent">
     <Session name="greeting">
       <Prompt text="Say hello to certification" as="reply" />
     </Session>
   </Agent>
   
   REPLY-START{reply}REPLY-END
   
   ```bash exec
   sleep 25

   DONE-MARKER

   
   Killed during the authored wait — the turn already committed — the resume
   replays the prefix, terminates exactly at the retained `agent_prompt`, settles
   `failed`, and never runs the suffix.
   
   ### Bisected in both directions
   
   - **Not replay in general, and not `<Evaluate>`.** The same shape with no Agent —
     `<File>`, a durable `<Evaluate source=… allow={["write"]}>`, another `<File>`,
     the same wait — killed at the same point **resumes and completes, exit 0**,
     with and without the `<Evaluate>`. #589's fix (`e84c0a7a`) is in this baseline
     and holds.
   - **Not completed replay.** Letting the identical agent document finish and then
     resuming replays it cleanly, exit 0, rendering the retained reply and
     contacting no agent. C2's completed-replay half looks healthy.
   - **Not the certification agent.** Its brain records every contact. Across the
     failing resume the totals are unchanged — `session`, `load`, `prompt`, all
     three from the killed first process, and nothing at all from the resumed one.
     The resumed run starts no agent process and asserts no session, so no
     session-reconciliation refusal of the fake agent's making can be the cause.
   
   ### It is what stops the supervised workflow too
   
   Killed after two agent turns, the full workflow's replay terminates after 15
   yields against a 21-entry journal; killed after the pull request is created,
   after the same 15 yields against a 95-entry journal. Journal index 15 is
   `import_component Prompt` and index 16 is
   `agent_prompt name="prompt:workflows/adversarial-implementation/Discovery.md:20:5#0"`
   — the run's first Agent turn, in both cases.
   
   ### Why no suite caught it
   
   Tier WAL's interrupted-resume case drives this shape in-process, where the
   executor, the attachment and the provider are the suite's own. No suite resumes a
   real killed `xmd workflow` process whose journal holds an `agent_prompt` — Tier
   WFX's crashed documents are `<File>` effects and a `sleep`.
   
   ### Consequence
   
   "Resume replays the prefix, performs the suffix once, and completes" does not
   hold for any workflow that has prompted an Agent, which is every supervised
   workflow. CF2 cannot pass, CF4's restart leg is blocked behind it, and the
   durability claim that losing the host is survivable does not hold black-box.
   
   As in #589, the divergence message masks whatever actually refused ("root
   terminated after N yields" was a thrown ceiling refusal there), so expect the
   diagnosis to need the underlying error surfaced first.
   
   `issue-299-planner-handback.md` is updated with all four findings.
   
5. taras commented on Aug 25, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 25, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Planner disposition of the certification handback

   PASS remains withheld, and certification execution remains paused. C1-C10 and CF1-CF6 are unchanged.

   Three reported findings are shipped-behavior conformance defects and must be repaired before PR #181 receives a new certification baseline:

   1. workflow-owned <Elicit> suspension: repair CLI provider assembly and add a real source-entrypoint suspension/answer/resume regression;
   2. generated observation admission: change both instructions to <File path="README.md" /> and make AC2 exercise a real observation/result round trip; and
   3. GitHub Issues endpoint plumbing: pass the configured endpoint into the default access provider and prove it against a loopback endpoint.

   The retained-Agent crash/resume addendum is not a product blocker. The reproducer returned unrelated provider identities from session/new and session/load. That is a canonical identity replacement, which the workflow correctly refuses before reattachment. I changed only the throwaway fake ACP provider to assert one stable identity and reran the same kill/resume shape: it resumed to completion, retained the committed prefix, and made no second Agent prompt. C2 and CF2 therefore stay frozen as written.

   The issue body now records the repair stack and focused commands. R1 and R2 start independently from exact main 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e; R3 starts from exact PR #181 diagnostic head b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c. After all three are integrated, PR #181 must be rebased and returned to the Planner so a new exact head/base/merge-base can be frozen before certification implementation.

   The process-boundary certification harness shape is accepted. Its fake ACP provider must preserve one canonical agentSessionId across session/new and every session/load. After the repairs, scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts remains the only new certification path.

   #363 and #496 remain non-blocking. Do not begin #292, run certification, or mark PR #181 ready.
6. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 26, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Prerequisite tracking update

   • R1 (Make workflow Elicit commit durable suspension through the CLI #607) merged through PR 🐛 Let the workflow host answer its own <Elicit> through the CLI #609 as cbd30099392b19aa82bb8c2a36fe4c1ee092ed53.
   • R2 (Honor the configured GitHub Issues API endpoint #608) merged through PR 🐛 Send an Issue to the API base the host configured (#608) #613 as 37aa8a623f6c7dfe4874eac2adcd1348ab4f28a1.
   • Current main is 37aa8a623f6c7dfe4874eac2adcd1348ab4f28a1.

   Both repairs preserve their planned conformance boundaries and carry their focused regressions. Their implementation branches are descended from the frozen repair base 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e; R1 and R2 were integrated serially on main without turning either into a certification permutation.

   R3 remains the only open prerequisite repair. It stays owned by #301 and draft PR #181: correct the generated observation spelling and make AC2 prove the real observation/result round trip. After its focused feedback passes, rebase PR #181 over current main and return its new exact head/base/merge base to the Planner before any #299 certification command runs.

   C1-C10 and CF1-CF6 remain frozen. #363 and #496 remain non-blocking. Do not begin #292 or mark PR #181 ready.
7. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 26, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Planner feedback verdict for R3: PASS

   Reviewed exact commit 038d484f8854d1a18018bd2de88557fa95ae6ab5 against parent b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c and merge base 170a021db9d551f96f1e9bfdd9ea61f74e30e44e.

   The patch changes exactly the two planned paths:

   • workflows/adversarial-implementation/Implementation.md
   • scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts

   Both judgment calls satisfy the frozen R3 evidence:

   • changing Script.observations from a dead list of suite-authored sources to a count makes the scripted Agent copy the observation envelope from the shipped prompt, so AC2 discriminates the document defect rather than merely proving a test-authored spelling is admissible;
   • pinning that instructed envelope literally is appropriate document-truthfulness evidence and makes a regression fail at the changed instruction without widening generated-XMD admission.

   AC2 proves the complete assigned round trip: the prompt-authored self-closing File fragment is admitted, XMD performs one Workspace README read, the distinctive result is absent from the requesting prompt and present in the next prompt, and the proposal follows in the same Agent session. The existing no-Workspace/no-directory/no-MCP/no-credential/no-native-tool boundary remains unchanged.

   Independent focused verification on the exact clean commit:

   deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts packages/core/tests/generated-xmd.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-agent.test.ts
   ok | 17 passed (130 steps) | 0 failed (1m20s)
   
   git diff --check b0c31e2069058a77db40db172271e93ae352485c 038d484f8854d1a18018bd2de88557fa95ae6ab5
   (no output, exit 0)
   

   This is the final R3 feedback verdict, independent of CI. No further R3 implementation is required.

   Next: rebase this accepted commit onto current main 37aa8a623f6c7dfe4874eac2adcd1348ab4f28a1, which contains R1 and R2; run the focused integration evidence for all three repairs; push the resulting PR #181 head; and return its exact head/base/merge base to the Planner. Do not start #299 certification until that new target is frozen.
8. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 26, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Planner baseline decision: rebase PR #181 once more before certification freeze.

   The pushed integration checkpoint is valid:

   • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head: dee7d23e0330b1f73faac9c78783d5890f84e5ee
   • merge base used: 37aa8a623f6c7dfe4874eac2adcd1348ab4f28a1
   • R1-R3 focused evidence: 32 tests, 191 steps, zero failures
   • R3 range-diff: byte-identical to the Planner-PASS feedback commit

   It is not the certification target. Current main advanced through #610 to b952af602437e0c1db2137a74453504ae7541da5; GitHub now reports PR #181 as BEHIND. #610 changes workflow suspension, answer delivery, Workspace root/manifest code, architecture, and the workflow Workspace specification. Those are boundaries consumed by C2, C3, C5, and C9, so certifying the earlier merge base would certify a target different from the one PR #181 will integrate with.

   Required next action:

   1. Rebase exact head dee7d23e0330b1f73faac9c78783d5890f84e5ee onto exact main b952af602437e0c1db2137a74453504ae7541da5.
   2. Confirm the PR's 39-commit range remains unchanged or report every changed replay.
   3. Rerun the same combined R1-R3 focused command and git diff --check.
   4. Push with force-with-lease pinned to dee7d23e0330b1f73faac9c78783d5890f84e5ee after verifying the remote head still equals it.
   5. Return the new exact PR head, base ref, merge base, clean-tree result, range-diff result, and focused evidence to the Planner.

   Do not add #610's artifact suite to the R1-R3 repair matrix: #610's own merged evidence owns that feature, while #299's frozen commands will exercise its selected shared workflow boundaries on the final target. Do not begin certification until the new baseline is recorded.
9. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

   

   taras

   on Aug 26, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Planner integration decision: move the certification cut to current main 84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70.

   PR #181 checkpoint e698be52365d47702d4fcfa4ff2b3a17eb0f5584 is accepted but not frozen for certification. Its R1-R3 evidence is green, R3 remains byte-identical to its Planner-PASS feedback commit, and the sole prior range-diff change is context only: #605's added capability row is unchanged and #610's neighbouring row is retained.

   PR #614 is relevant to this branch. It changes deno.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, tsconfig.node.json, and the shared workflow test helpers. Its merged contract explicitly identifies PR #181 as the cross-package consumer and records a successful probe replacing the AC suite's private NOISE/effects() and hostRecords() readers with @executablemd/test-support/journal.

   Next action:

   1. Rebase e698be52365d47702d4fcfa4ff2b3a17eb0f5584 onto 84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70.
   2. Run deno task setup because the dependency layout changed.
   3. Add one integration commit changing only scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts: use effectSequence() for the existing order claims and readRetainedValues() for Git-host records; remove the private duplicate readers while preserving every existing assertion.
   4. Run the combined R1-R3 command plus packages/test-support/tests/journal.test.ts, then git diff --check.
   5. Push with force-with-lease pinned to e698be52365d47702d4fcfa4ff2b3a17eb0f5584 after verifying the remote head.
   6. Return the exact new head/base/merge base, clean-tree result, range-diff, integration-commit path, setup result, and focused evidence to the Planner.

   Cutoff rule after that handoff: a later main commit does not automatically move the freeze. Rebase again only if it changes a path imported or executed by the frozen commands, changes a settled runtime/persistence/packaging/documentation boundary used by C1-C10, or branch rules make the reviewed head unmergeable. Otherwise freeze the returned exact head/base and begin #299 certification.

   Do not begin certification, inspect CI, run the delivery battery, mark PR #181 ready, or begin #292 during this integration step.
10. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Planner freeze: READY FOR #299 CERTIFICATION IMPLEMENTATION

    Exact frozen target:

    • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head: dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186
    • base ref: 84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70
    • merge base: 84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70
    • PR state: open, draft, mergeable
    • implementation worktree: clean

    Preconditions present:

    • Read complete pull-request review evidence from a workflow #576 is in the base through PR 🔎 Let a workflow read the objections a pull request already holds #580.
    • Compose the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #301's composed consumer and AC0-AC7 are in the frozen head.
    • Deliver answers to suspended workflows for later resumption #300 slice 2 is in the frozen head/base ancestry through PR ⏱️ Let a trusted host decide when the ordinary resume runs #605.
    • R1/Make workflow Elicit commit durable suspension through the CLI #607 is in the base through PR 🐛 Let the workflow host answer its own <Elicit> through the CLI #609.
    • R2/Honor the configured GitHub Issues API endpoint #608 is in the base through PR 🐛 Send an Issue to the API base the host configured (#608) #613.
    • R3 has Planner PASS and remains byte-identical in the frozen head.
    • PR 🧪 Read a journal's retained effects the same way in every suite #614's shared journal-reader integration is the final commit and changes one AC-suite path.

    Integration evidence on this exact head:

    deno task test packages/cli/tests/workflow-suspension.test.ts packages/workflow/tests/ambient-authentication.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-host.test.ts scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts packages/core/tests/generated-xmd.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-agent.test.ts packages/test-support/tests/journal.test.ts
    ok | 33 passed (200 steps) | 0 failed (2m11s)
    
    git diff --check
    (no output, exit 0)
    

    Independent Planner inspection confirms all 39 pre-integration commits are range-identical and commit 40 changes only scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts as planned.

    The certification Implementor may now add only scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts with frozen CF1-CF6 and execute the frozen commands in the issue body. The process-boundary ACP provider must retain one canonical agentSessionId across session/new and every session/load.

    Do not substitute another head/base, change C1-C10 or CF1-CF6, add Worker Shell, expand #496, begin #292, inspect CI, mark PR #181 ready, or merge. If the one-file certification path cannot establish a frozen criterion, return the reproducer and structural consequence to the Planner.
11. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    CF2 is blocked at the frozen head — the fourth finding was never repaired

    Preflight on dae877a2 over 84a8068b, before any certification file exists.
    R1, R2 and R3 all verify on this head:

    • R1 holds. A top-level <Elicit> and one inside a bundled component both
      suspend under xmd workflow start: exit 2, workflow status: suspended, no
      loopback form.
    • R2 holds. (Its own suite is in the frozen focused command.)
    • R3 holds. AC2 performs the observation round trip.

    The fourth finding from the preflight handback — a killed run does not resume
    past a retained Agent turn — was never assigned a repair, and it still
    reproduces:

    $ xmd workflow resume agent-probe
    workflow run: agent-probe
    Divergence: workflow root terminated after 4 yields, but journal has 6 yield entries;
    first unreached entry is import_component("Prompt") at workflow.md:5:5
    workflow status: failed
    

    The whole document is <Agent><Session><Prompt …/></Session></Agent>, a
    rendered capture, a bash exec wait, and a marker. It is killed during the
    wait, after the turn committed. #611's naming makes the stop precise: the
    replayed root never reaches import_component("Prompt"), and the resumed
    document renders its heading and nothing else — no error segment.

    What is now ruled out.

    • Not replay, and not <Evaluate>. The same shape without an Agent — <File>,
      a durable <Evaluate … allow={["write"]}>, another <File>, the same wait —
      killed at the same point resumes and completes, exit 0.
    • Not the certification agent, and not session reattachment. The scripted
      agent's controller records every contact; the resumed process makes none — no
      session, no load, no prompt. I had reported a lead that the retained
      provider-session arrangement refuses the reattachment. That lead is
      refuted: deleting the run's whole *.sessions sidecar before the resume
      changes nothing — same divergence, same position.
    • Not suspension. A suspended composed run resumes past its agent turns today
      (Tier AC4 does exactly that in-process), so what fails is specifically a
      killed run whose journal holds an agent_prompt.

    Consequence for the matrix. CF2 as frozen — "A real process death after a
    committed effect and during the next effect … Resume replays the prefix,
    performs the suffix once, and completes" — cannot pass on this head, and CF4's
    restart leg is blocked behind it for any run that prompts an Agent. C2 is unmet.

    What I am doing meanwhile. CF1, CF3, CF4, CF5 and CF6 do not depend on it —
    CF1's continuation is a suspension and answer, which works — so I am
    implementing those and will run every frozen command that does not require CF2.
    CF2 will be implemented but is expected to fail until this is repaired; I will
    not weaken its assertions to make it pass, and I will not create a feedback
    commit claiming certification while it does.
12. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Correction and escalation: no workflow that has prompted an Agent can be continued through the CLI

    My earlier comment framed this as a crash-only defect ("a killed run does not
    resume past a retained Agent turn"). Building CF1 disproved that framing. It is
    not about the kill. A run that suspends normally, is answered normally, and is
    resumed normally fails in exactly the same place.

    The reproducer is twenty lines and involves no kill

    <Agent name="cert-agent">
      <Session name="greeting">
        <Prompt text="Say hello to certification" as="reply" />
      </Session>
    </Agent>
    
    REPLY-START{reply}REPLY-END
    
    <Elicit schema={…} as="decision">Proceed?</Elicit>
    
    DONE-MARKER

    $ xmd workflow start --id=agent-probe workflow.md   → exit 2, suspended
    $ xmd workflow answer agent-probe <id> '{"proceed":true}'  → exit 0
    $ xmd workflow resume agent-probe --verbose
    workflow run: agent-probe
    Divergence: workflow root terminated after 4 yields, but journal has 8 yield entries;
    first unreached entry is import_component("Prompt") at workflow.md:5:5
    workflow status: failed
    

    --verbose adds no further diagnosis. The resumed document renders its heading
    and nothing else.

    The same thing stops the supervised workflow

    CF1, driven through both entrypoints, reaches the authorization checkpoint,
    suspends (exit 2), takes its answer (exit 0) and then fails its continuation:

    Divergence: workflow root terminated after 15 yields, but journal has 63 yield entries;
    first unreached entry is import_component("Prompt") at workflows/adversarial-implementation/Discovery.md:20:5
    

    Localized: it is the attachment that installs the Agent profile

    Two paths, one document, one head — the contrast is exact:

    replay	Agent profile installed?	result
    completed replay (run to completion, then resume again)	no — the host deliberately installs none	exit 0, replays cleanly, contacts no agent
    partial replay (resume after a suspension or a kill)	yes — live/partial attachment installs it	exit 1, terminates at import_component("Prompt")

    So the path that installs no Agent profile replays a retained agent_prompt
    correctly, and the path that installs one does not. That inverts the obvious
    guess — it is not a missing registration. Also already ruled out: the retained
    provider-session arrangement (deleting the run's whole *.sessions sidecar
    before the resume changes nothing), the certification agent (the resumed process
    makes no contact with it at all — no session, no load, no prompt), and
    replay in general (the same shape with no <Agent> resumes and completes,
    before and after a durable <Evaluate>).

    Tier AC4 resumes the same composed workflow past its agent turns in-process
    and passes, so what differs is what the CLI assembles around a partial
    attachment — which is precisely the layer this certification exists to test and
    the only layer no other tier covers.

    What it costs the matrix

    C1 and C2 cannot be met, and C3's black-box half cannot. Concretely: CF1
    (its continuation is a resume), CF2 (a killed final workflow), and CF4's
    restart leg for any run that prompts an Agent. A supervised workflow is
    today a single-process affair: it completes only if nobody is ever asked
    anything.

    What I am doing

    Implementing CF1–CF6 as frozen, without weakening an assertion to make one pass:
    CF1 and CF2 will be red until this is repaired. CF4, CF5 and CF6 do not depend
    on it and are being built now, and I will run every frozen command and report
    each result as it stands. No feedback commit will claim certification while this
    is open.
13. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Certification record — executed at the frozen head, PASS withheld

    Baseline: PR #181 head dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186 over base
    84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70. scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts
    now exists and implements CF1–CF6 with the frozen names and assignments.

    Frozen commands, in their recorded order

    command	result
    deno task build	exit 0 (dist/xmd rebuilt at this head)
    deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts	3 of 7 steps pass — CF4, CF5, CF6 green; CF1 (both entrypoint rows), CF2, CF3 red
    the frozen focused owner-suite command (31 files)	83 passed, 1 failed — SCH9 only
    pnpm exec tsx --tsconfig tsconfig.node.json --test packages/cli/tests/workflow-host.test.ts	17 pass, 0 fail
    bun test --timeout=300000 packages/cli/tests/workflow-host.test.ts	17 pass, 0 fail
    deno task check	exit 0
    deno task check:jsr	exit 0
    deno task verify	not run — the issue sequences delivery after focused evidence passes, and it has not

    What passes, and what it establishes

    • CF4 — two named Repositories and Worktrees keep their dirty worktrees and
      their unpushed commits across a restart, and the continuation publishes only
      the branch the document authored, at the commit the first execution made.
    • CF5 — a malformed proposal envelope and a denied native tool each stop the
      run before any later effect: no Push, no pull request, no issue, no branch.
      The denial is a real session/request_permission over ACP, refused by the
      shipped permission bridge.
    • CF6 — a completed replay performs nothing at all (no agent contact, no
      forge call, no ref movement); the retained history accounts for every material
      decision and holds no transcript, host path, provider handle, credential,
      endpoint or Git sidecar ref; a compatible fork continues and an incompatible
      one is refused; and a secret in an answer is refused before delivery retains
      it.

    CF1's first execution also does the whole supervised workflow on both
    entrypoints — discovery, planning, both loops, the observation round trip, the
    generated mutation, local Git, Push, PullRequest, all three review reads and
    Issue handling — and the Agent profile is asserted from the agent's own side:
    empty provider-owned cwd, no additional directory, mcpServers: [],
    allowedTools: [], and the deny-all instruction layer.

    Why CF1, CF2 and CF3 are red — one reason, not three

    A run whose journal holds an Agent turn cannot be continued. Reported in
    full above; every red case here is that defect:

    • CF1 (both rows): the run suspends at the authorization checkpoint, the answer
      is retained, and the resume fails —
      Divergence: workflow root terminated after 15 yields … first unreached entry is import_component("Prompt") at workflows/adversarial-implementation/Discovery.md:20:5.
    • CF2: the same divergence after a real SIGKILL.
    • CF3: new evidence — the scheduled resume runs in this process, through
      scheduleResume() over a host that attaches what the Deno entrypoint attaches
      (Agent profile included), and reaches the identical divergence. So it is not
      the CLI's document assembly: it is the workflow Agent profile on a partial
      attachment. Tier AC4 resumes the same composed workflow past its agent turns
      and installs a scripted provider instead.

    The three cases assert what the matrix froze and fail where the behaviour is. I
    did not narrow them to the branch that passes.

    SCH9 is stale, not broken

    SCH9: the stacked base is the reviewed composed consumer pins the content
    hashes of the reviewed consumer, and R3 changed two of those files:

    - "scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts": "606c950d…"
    + "scripts/tests/adversarial-composition-workflow.test.ts": "bb942b50…"
    - "workflows/adversarial-implementation/Implementation.md": "c2b71b83…"
    + "workflows/adversarial-implementation/Implementation.md": "c3807657…"
    

    Neither R3's focused command nor the combined R1–R3 command included
    packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts, so this gate is the first run
    that could see it. Updating those pins belongs to that suite's owner.

    Deviation from the one expected path

    Two extra paths, both registration rather than behaviour. CF1 drives the
    compiled dist/xmd, which no test shard builds, so the suite joins
    scripts/tests/component-form-dispatch.test.ts in the manifest's
    compiled-binary list (excluded from all three runtimes' discovery, run by
    smoke) — scripts/runtime-test-exclusions.ts — and that manifest's own pinned
    list in scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts names it. Left unregistered,
    the file joins every runtime's corpus by default and breaks test-node,
    test-bun and the Deno shards. Both edits are one entry each; say the word if
    you want them reverted and the registration decided separately.

    Commit

    The work is staged but uncommitted: the 1Password signing agent refused
    (error: 1Password: failed to fill whole buffer), which is how it reports being
    locked. Nothing is pushed. I will create the feedback commit as soon as it is
    unlocked, and it will be described as evidence rather than as certification —
    CF1–CF3 are red on a shipped defect, so PASS is withheld.
14. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Planner correction of the first certification handback

    PASS remains withheld, but the four red CF rows do not establish a shipped Agent-resume defect.

    The staged fake ACP provider repeats the invalid reproducer already rejected during preflight:

    session/new  → sessionId = random A, _meta.agentSessionId = random B
    session/load → _meta.agentSessionId = sessionId A
    

    The workflow retains canonical identity B and correctly refuses A as a replacement on partial attachment. The resulting terminal divergence is the wrapper around that harness refusal. This directly violates #299's frozen requirement that the fake provider retain one canonical agentSessionId across session/new and every session/load.

    Required correction: generate one identity per new session and return it as both sessionId and _meta.agentSessionId; assert that same identity on load. Rerun CF1-CF6 before attributing any remaining failure to product behavior.

    Two scope decisions:

    1. Keep the runtime-registration paths. The certification suite is explicitly owned by Certify the adversarial implementation workflow end to end #299's build-then-test command and must not join ordinary Deno, Node, or Bun discovery. Correct the comments/reason so they name that explicit owner and do not imply the smoke job runs this suite.
    2. Amend SCH9 in packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts. Preserve Deliver answers to suspended workflows for later resumption #300's historical stacked base 525efaa7 / 170a021d; update the two reviewed-consumer blob pins and adjacent explanation for the Planner-reviewed R3 and 🧪 Read a journal's retained effects the same way in every suite #614 amendments at frozen head dae877a2. Keep SCH9's ID and SCH1-SCH8 unchanged.

    The authorized changed-path set is now exactly four:

    • scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts
    • scripts/runtime-test-exclusions.ts
    • scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
    • packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts

    Do not create a red feedback commit. First run:

    deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
    git diff --check
    

    Once focused evidence is green, create the signed feedback commit. The 1Password agent must be unlocked by its operator; do not bypass signing. Then rerun every frozen #299 command on that exact commit, including deno task verify only after the preceding focused evidence passes.

    If CF1-CF3 still fail with a stable canonical provider identity, return the corrected trace and underlying cause to the Planner. No product repair, architecture amendment, matrix change, Worker scope, #496 expansion, #292 work, PR readiness change, or merge is authorized now.
15. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Correction, and the certification record: CF1–CF6 all pass

    I was wrong twice, and the Planner's diagnosis was right. The "shipped
    defect" I reported — that a run which has prompted an Agent cannot be continued
    — does not exist. Both of my earlier reports
    (1,
    2)
    were my harness, and they should be read as withdrawn.

    Two faults, both mine:

    1. The scripted agent asserted two identities. session/new answered
       sessionId=A with _meta.agentSessionId=B, and session/load answered
       agentSessionId=A. Every reattachment therefore met an identity that did not
       match the one the run had recorded, and the refusal surfaced as a divergence
       at the <Prompt> the run had already answered. One identity for both values,
       and CF1 and CF2 pass.
    2. My in-process executor omitted what the entrypoint declares. CF3
       schedules its resume through runWorkflow(), and I passed only
       execution.installations to executeInstalled(). packages/cli/src/cli.ts
       also declares agentIdentityComponents() — <Session> names durable work
       after its own invocation — so without it <Session> expanded and the turns
       beneath it never replayed. Declared, and CF3 passes.

    My "refutation" of the first — deleting the run's *.sessions sidecar and
    seeing no change — was not one: with the store gone the provider asserts
    nothing, which the reattachment refuses for its own reason. Two paths to the
    same refusal, and I read the second as evidence about the first.

    Certification result

    deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts \
      packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts \
      scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
    → ok | 8 passed (35 steps) | 0 failed (5m16s)
    
    git diff --check → (no output, exit 0)
    

    Feedback commit 45123ff40d94cccdd0b30272f01bd65aa60c2e31, signed, parent
    dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186, merge base
    84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70. Not pushed.

    case	result
    CF1 (Deno source)	pass
    CF1 (compiled dist/xmd)	pass
    CF2	pass
    CF3	pass
    CF4	pass
    CF5	pass
    CF6	pass

    Earlier in this session, at this same head: deno task build exit 0; the frozen
    focused owner-suite command 83 passed / 1 failed (SCH9 only, now repaired
    below); Node WFH 17/0; Bun WFH 17/0; deno task check exit 0; deno task check:jsr exit 0. The focused owner command should be re-run on this commit
    before the verdict is taken — it has not been since SCH9's pins moved.

    The two extra paths

    • scripts/runtime-test-exclusions.ts and scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
      — the suite drives dist/xmd, which no shard builds, so it joins the binary
      suite already excluded from every runtime's discovery. The manifest now states
      that Certify the adversarial implementation workflow end to end #299's own commands own it — they build the binary and then name the
      file outright — rather than delegating it to smoke.
    • packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts — SCH9's two reviewed-blob
      pins move to bb942b50… (AC suite) and c3807657… (Implementation document),
      which is what R3 left. Its 525efaa7 over 170a021d provenance is untouched,
      and the comment says why the pins moved: two blobs changed under a repair
      reviewed in its own right, and pinning what they hold now keeps that case
      about this slice rather than about nobody.
16. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Planner feedback verdict for certification implementation commit 45123ff40d94cccdd0b30272f01bd65aa60c2e31: PASS

    Reviewed exact signed commit (%G? = G) against parent dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186 and merge base 84a8068b770a7435e4c0199cc0a8e1fb91283d70.

    The commit changes exactly the four authorized paths. The fake ACP provider now asserts one stable identity from session/new through session/load; CF3's in-process executor declares agentIdentityComponents() and uses collect() so it cannot report an unfinished execution as finished; the runtime exclusion truthfully names #299's explicit build-then-test owner; and SCH9 preserves #300's historical stacked-base provenance while pinning the two Planner-reviewed amended blobs.

    Focused evidence:

    deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
    ok | 8 passed (35 steps) | 0 failed (5m16s)
    
    git diff --check
    (no output, exit 0)
    

    This PASS is the final Planner feedback verdict on 45123ff4; it is independent of delivery and CI.

    Do not rerun the 31-file frozen owner command on this now-superseded base. Current main advanced to 6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48. PR #615, merged within that range, changes workflow lifecycle, Agent-session storage, CLI workflow execution, workflow specifications, and scripts/runtime-test-exclusions.ts; those are imported or exercised by C1, C2, C6, C9, and the frozen command graph. Under #299's cutoff rule, final certification must move to that base.

    Next:

    1. Verify remote PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head still equals dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186.
    2. Rebase the complete local range through signed feedback commit 45123ff40d94cccdd0b30272f01bd65aa60c2e31 onto 6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48.
    3. Preserve the union of PR 📤 Seal one workflow run's evidence into a file, and put nothing there unless it worked #615's runtime exclusions and Certify the adversarial implementation workflow end to end #299's certification exclusion; report every conflict resolution and range-diff change.
    4. Confirm all rebased commits are signed, rerun the three-file focused command and git diff --check, and push with force-with-lease pinned to dae877a294bbbba5057ba2754f1970c2fcda6186.
    5. Return the new exact head/base/merge base to the Planner. Only after that freeze should every frozen Certify the adversarial implementation workflow end to end #299 command be run on the exact rebased commit, including the 31-file owner command and, after all focused rows pass, deno task verify.

    No product repair, architecture amendment, matrix change, #292 work, readiness change, CI inspection, or merge is authorized by this handoff.
17. taras

    added a commit that references this issue on Aug 26, 2026

    🔬 Certify the supervised workflow from outside, on both entrypoints

    ...

    e85479c
18. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Planner freeze: RUN THE FULL #299 COMMAND MATRIX

    Exact final-execution target:

    • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head: e85479c33ce4c91d821e0eaf195150db374ae4a6
    • base ref: 6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48
    • merge base: 6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48
    • PR state: open, draft, mergeable
    • 41 commits, signed; clean worktree

    Current main still equals the base. The 41-commit range contains 40 identical replays and one context-only shift in #605: PR #615 changed the neighbouring artifact-export capability row, #605's scheduling additions are identical, and the final table contains both. The certification commit is unchanged at the signed final head.

    Focused evidence on this exact head:

    deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts packages/cli/tests/workflow-scheduling.test.ts scripts/tests/runtime-exclusions.test.ts
    ok | 8 passed (35 steps) | 0 failed (4m29s)
    
    git diff --check
    (no output, exit 0)
    

    Rebuilding dist/xmd before that focused run was correct and necessary; the compiled CF1 row must execute a binary built from the exact tested tree.

    Now execute every frozen command in the issue body, in order, on this exact commit. Start with deno task build, then CF1-CF6, the complete 31-file owner command, Node and Bun WFH, deno task check, deno task check:jsr, and finally deno task verify only if every preceding row passes. Record each result before rerunning a failure.

    Do not rebase, change the four-path implementation, change C1-C10 or CF1-CF6, inspect CI, mark PR #181 ready, merge, or begin #292 during execution. Return the complete command record to the Planner for the final #299 certification verdict.
19. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Final certification record — every frozen command passes on the frozen revision

    Executed in the frozen order on the frozen target, with a clean tree before and
    after, and nothing rebased, modified or re-frozen during execution.

    head	e85479c33ce4c91d821e0eaf195150db374ae4a6 (local and remote agree)
    base and merge base	6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48
    tree	clean before and after; git diff --check silent
    PR #181	OPEN, draft — unchanged

    Every frozen command, in order

    #	command	result
    1	deno task build	exit 0 — dist/xmd compiled at this base, and it is the binary row 2 ran
    2	deno task test scripts/tests/adversarial-workflow-certification.test.ts	ok, 7 steps, 0 failed (4m10s)
    3	the frozen 31-file owner-suite command	ok, 84 passed (568 steps), 0 failed (9m0s)
    4	pnpm exec tsx --tsconfig tsconfig.node.json --test packages/cli/tests/workflow-host.test.ts	17 tests, 17 pass, 0 fail
    5	bun test --timeout=300000 packages/cli/tests/workflow-host.test.ts	17 pass, 0 fail
    6	deno task check	exit 0
    7	deno task check:jsr	exit 0 — Success Dry run complete
    8	deno task verify	exit 0 — "the runtimes consumed the layout throughout, and tracked files, node_modules and deno.lock are unchanged"

    No command failed, so nothing was rerun and no flake policy applies.

    CF1–CF6, with their frozen names

    CF1: completes the supervised workflow through the Deno source entrypoint      ok (35s)
    CF1: completes the supervised workflow through the compiled xmd binary         ok (33s)
    CF2: resumes a killed final workflow from the exact committed journal and
         Workspace frontier                                                        ok (38s)
    CF3: schedules one ordinary resume for one retained answer                     ok (35s)
    CF4: retains two named Repositories and Worktrees with dirty and unpushed
         state across restart                                                      ok (25s)
    CF5: malformed Agent output and bounded exhaustion stop before later effects   ok (25s)
    CF6: completed replay and retained history contain no hidden decision state    ok (58s)
    

    C1–C10, and what establishes each

    • C1 — CF1, the one shared scenario through both entrypoints: one authored
      run performs discovery, planning, the plan review, authorization through a
      real suspension and answer, the observation round trip, the generated
      mutation, Git.Add/Git.Commit/Git.Push, PullRequest, all three review
      reads, Issue handling and acceptance — under deno run … packages/cli/src/deno.ts
      and under dist/xmd, with identical assertions.
    • C2 — CF2 (real SIGKILL after a committed effect; the resume replays the
      prefix, performs the suffix once, and a completed replay afterwards reaches no
      Agent, process, Git host, Issue or Fetch), with workflow-crash,
      workflow-installation and WAL2/WAL3 in row 3.
    • C3 — CF3 (the composed consumer suspends at a real checkpoint, delivery
      retains without executing, Deliver answers to suspended workflows for later resumption #300's scheduleResume() invokes the ordinary
      resume, one executor consumes it, one answer is published, the run continues
      once) with SCH1–SCH9 and workflow-suspension-answer in row 3.
    • C4 — WAP3, WAC6 and the workflow Files cancellation case,
      git-commit-crash, GH7's cancellation branch, SCH5–SCH7 and WFC2/WFC3, all in
      row 3. No Worker Shell case anywhere.
    • C5 — workspace-effect-transaction, workflow-run-storage,
      workspace-root and workflow-inspection in row 3.
    • C6 — CF4 (two named Repositories and Worktrees, both dirty, one commit
      unpushed, observed at the retained frontier after a restart, publishing only
      the authored branch at the commit the first execution made) with Add named Repository and Worktree composition #293's
      Repository storage, replay, materialization, control-plane, component and
      Worktree suites in row 3.
    • C7 — workflow-declaration, git-host-effect, git-push,
      pull-request, pull-request-read and issue-markdown in row 3.
    • C8 — CF1 and CF5 (a malformed proposal envelope and a denied native tool
      each stop before any later generated mutation, Git, Git-host, Issue or
      acceptance effect) with WAP1–WAP6, WSL1–WSL8, WAL1–WAL9, GXC, WGAC, AC0–AC7
      and the adversarial-planning suite in row 3.
    • C9 — CF6 (completed replay performs nothing; the retained history accounts
      for every material decision and holds no transcript-only decision, host path,
      provider handle, credential, endpoint or Git sidecar ref; compatible fork
      continues, incompatible fork refuses; a secret in an answer is refused before
      delivery retains it) with workflow-inspection, workflow-fork,
      git-host-effect and Reject secrets before journal persistence by default #199's secret-scanner in row 3.
    • C10 — rows 1–2 for the two entrypoints, rows 4–5 for Node and Bun running
      only WFH's common-help and fail-closed cases, rows 6–7 as the separate typing
      and publishability gates. The workflow documents this head ships are the ones
      CF1 executes: the fixture copies start.md and the five stages byte-for-byte
      into a committed repository, so what those documents describe is what ran —
      including the observation instruction R3 corrected, which CF1 and AC2 both
      send back verbatim.

    Scope boundaries honoured

    No Worker Shell case exists in this suite; completed replay starts no Worker and
    makes no Worker claim; #496 is untouched and unclaimed — CF1 proves the initial
    profile (empty disposable cwd the agent itself reports as empty, no Workspace or
    host path, no additional directories, no MCP servers, an empty requested tool
    set, deny-all, and a native permission request denied and failing its turn), not
    portable adapter-level absence. No Workspace content is secret-scanned. Node and
    Bun ran WFH only.

    The three leaf substitutions are unchanged and stated in the suite's own module
    comment: the agent process, the forge origin, and a git that bridges the one
    locator the Git-host adapters admit to the disposable bare repository.

    I believe this satisfies every exit condition on this exact revision. The
    verdict is the Planner's to record.
20. taras commented on Aug 26, 2026

    

    taras

    on Aug 26, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    Final Planner certification verdict: PASS

    Reviewed exact frozen target:

    • PR ✨ Compose and certify the supervised adversarial implementation workflow #181 head: e85479c33ce4c91d821e0eaf195150db374ae4a6
    • base and merge base: 6717e867c9467114e6b060620d5b18c87beb2c48
    • PR state during certification: OPEN, draft, local and remote heads identical
    • tree: clean before and after; git diff --check silent

    Every frozen command passed once, in order. The compiled binary was rebuilt from the certified tree before CF1. CF1 passed through both the Deno source entrypoint and compiled dist/xmd; CF2-CF6 passed under their frozen names; the 31-file owner command passed 84 tests and 568 steps; Node and Bun passed all 17 WFH tests each; deno task check, deno task check:jsr, and deno task verify exited successfully. No failure was rerun and no flake policy applies.

    The execution record maps the passing evidence to C1-C10 without changing the frozen assignments. The frozen boundaries also hold: no Worker Shell claim, #496 remains non-blocking and unclaimed beyond the initial Agent profile, no arbitrary Workspace-content scan, and Node/Bun remain limited to WFH.

    deno task verify is the exact delivery command frozen by #299. deno task verify:clean is a separate repository task and was not added after execution as a new certification condition.

    This closes the finite Planner certification on the exact reviewed revision. #363 and #496 remain non-blocking. The next issue is #292, which owns final synchronization of PR #181 onto a fresh head and the ordinary readiness, required-CI, and merge closure. PR #181 remains draft until that work begins.
21. taras

    closed this as completedon Aug 26, 2026
22. taras

    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Aug 26, 2026

    📝 Say what this workflow does, now that it does it

    ...

    99fe43a

    🧹 Hold the certification suite to the rules the shards enforce

    ...

    f9cbe4d
23. taras

    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 8, 2026

    🔬 Certify the supervised workflow from outside, on both entrypoints

    ...

    9e1f0c2

    🧹 Hold the certification suite to the rules the shards enforce

    ...

    56d3f7c