Skip to content

feat: add missing lint rule for allowed fields for AsyncAPI3 (swg-16802)#5165

Merged
cka121 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/swg-16802-add-missing-lint-for-asyncapi-3
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

feat: add missing lint rule for allowed fields for AsyncAPI3 (swg-16802)#5165
cka121 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/swg-16802-add-missing-lint-for-asyncapi-3

Conversation

@cka121
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cka121 cka121 commented Apr 24, 2026

This PR adds missing linting rule for allowed fileds for AsyncAPI3

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Checklist

My PR contains...

  • No code changes (src/ is unmodified: changes to documentation, CI, metadata, etc.)
  • Dependency changes (any modification to dependencies in package.json)
  • Bug fixes (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvements (misc. changes to existing features)
  • Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

My changes...

  • are breaking changes to a public API (config options, System API, major UI change, etc).
  • are breaking changes to a private API (Redux, component props, utility functions, etc.).
  • are breaking changes to a developer API (npm script behavior changes, new dev system dependencies, etc).
  • are not breaking changes.

Documentation

  • My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.
  • My changes require a change to the project documentation.
  • If yes to above: I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Automated tests

  • My changes can not or do not need to be tested.
  • My changes can and should be tested by unit and/or integration tests.
  • If yes to above: I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • If yes to above: I have taken care to cover edge cases in my tests.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@cka121 cka121 merged commit c99277e into main Apr 24, 2026
9 checks passed
@cka121 cka121 deleted the feat/swg-16802-add-missing-lint-for-asyncapi-3 branch April 24, 2026 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants