Repository navigation
VlasovMaxwellCoupling: implicit energy-conserving Vlasov-Maxwell step with quasi-neutral limit; model VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral - #821
Merged
Conversation
…ling Semi-discrete systems in struphy operator notation (M1, M2, C, Lambda^1, W), Crank-Nicolson update, SchurSolver blocks A, B, C, resulting Schur system, accumulated matrix/vector and conserved quantities. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…w docs] The Schur operator M1 + dt^2/4 C^T M2 C is preconditioned by StiffnessPreconditioner(curl, mid=dt^2/4 M2, stab=M1), built per time step in prepare_time_step. Iterations hardly depend on dt (hollow cylinder 16x16x4, p=3: 39 instead of 411 PCG iterations at dt = 100 h); for dt <~ h the mass preconditioner stays slightly better. algo="explicit" falls back to the mass preconditioner, solver="cg" drops the preconditioner with a warning. New test file test_maxwell_weak_ampere.py. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nt preconditioners and solvers [preview docs] - remove the iteration-count sentence from the MaxwellWeakAmpere docstring - full-path cross-references (Derham.curl, SchurSolver, prepare_time_step, kernel functions in their *_kernels modules); feectools inverse as literal - dev-feec.rst: new sections Preconditioners (struphy.feec.preconditioner, struphy.polar.kron_2dx1d, multigrid preconditioner) and Linear solvers (schur_solver, solver) - dev-pic.rst: vlasov_maxwell accumulation kernel, new Pusher kernels section with push_v_with_efield Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The raw docstrings of SchurSolver, SchurSolverFull and SchurSolverFull3 used \\text and \\right (a LaTeX line break in a raw string), which broke the math; rewritten with pmatrix. Markdown links replaced by plain names, and the SchurSolver Parameters section now matches the signature (precond, solver_params). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…n [preview docs] Lynch, Rice and Thomas (1964) for the method, Sangalli and Tani (2016) for preconditioning spline stiffness matrices; short description of the generalized eigendecomposition used by KroneckerSumSolver. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nalization [preview docs] Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One implicit Crank-Nicolson step for Ampere (kappa dE/dt), Faraday and the electric force on the markers, with free coefficients c1, c2, c3. The Schur system kappa M1 + dt^2/4 (c1 C^T M2 C + c2 c3 A) is solved for the mid-point field; it stays well-posed for kappa -> 0 (no displacement current), where the plasma term absorbs the kernel of the curl-curl operator. Exact energy conservation (full-f), stiffness preconditioner with stabilization kappa + dt^2 c2 c3 n_ref / 4. The model subclasses VlasovMaxwellOneSpecies (propagator linking factored out), adds the scalar en_H and a Weibel example for kappa = 1 and 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…general coefficients - assert no polar splines in VlasovMaxwellCoupling (the V1 buffers are tensor-product) - test_discrete_equations: residual of the CN Ampere and Faraday laws with c1, c2, c3 all different (catches wrong coefficients in the Schur system or the pusher) - energy test also with explicit coefficients; test the solver rebuild on dt change with a given n_ref; drop the tautological e^n-independence test Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… other 6D couplings With matrix_free=True the vector j and the fillings w_p G^-1 per marker are accumulated by vlasov_maxwell_mf (AccumulatorVector) and the particle matrix in the Schur operator is a MarkerOperator (marker_operator_symm_dot). Tests: same steps as assembled (test_matrix_free_6d.py, kappa = 1 and 0), discrete equations with both variants. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…lasovMaxwellCoupling Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…kappa = 0 At kappa = 0 the constraint holds at the mid-point only, so its residual r = c1 C^T M2 b - c2 j(V) changes sign in every step: initial data that violate it (e.g. marker noise in J) oscillate with period 2 without damping. The option initial_projection (default True) replaces (b, V) once in the setup (first prepare_time_step) by the mid-point state of one step, an implicit Euler step of dt/2 that satisfies the constraint exactly and does not depend on dt. Tests: sign flip without, vanishing residual, dt independence and stationary steps with the projection; step-level tests at kappa = 0 run without it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
e_mid of the projection is an impulse of size 1/dt; writing it into e replaced the initial Poisson field in the saved t = 0 data (en_E, gauss_error). At kappa = 0, e does not enter the steps, so only b and V are projected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… kappa = 0 1D-3V Weibel instability (k = 1.25, 1e5 full-f markers, dt = 1, t = 160) in the quasi-neutral limit; the growth rate fitted to the magnetic energy for 80 < t < 150 must be within 15 % of the analytical 0.02784 (fitted: 0.02506, the same on 1, 2 and 4 ranks). About 45 s serial, 25 s on 2 or 4 ranks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… with the same loading With pseudo-random markers the fitted growth rate is noise-limited (about 10 % low, 7 % seed-to-seed scatter at 1e5 markers). With the antithetic Sobol loading the current noise mostly cancels: gamma = 0.02770 / 0.02784 / 0.02782 on 1 / 2 / 4 ranks against the analytical 0.02784, so the tolerance is now 5 %. Review fixes: comments on the kappa = 0 dispersion relation and on reading the scalars, rmtree(ignore_errors=True). The example (Tend = 400) now gives gamma = 0.02805 (kappa = 1) and 0.02758 (kappa = 0). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eed, 7 % tolerance Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
spossann
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 23, 2026 10:53
This was referenced Oct 23, 2026
…parameters lam and kappa - species equation parameters lam = Omega_c x / c (new) and kappa = Omega_p x / c (redefined, was Omega_p t, unused); overridable in the model constructor - VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral: velocity scale cyclotron, constructor arguments lam, kappa; Ampere's law lam^2 dE/dt = curl B - kappa^2/eps J; doc_normalization directly below doc_pde; energies en_E, en_B, en_f and en_tot = conserved energy of the coupling step; Gauss' law lam^2 div E = c2 rho for the initial Poisson solve, which is skipped for lam = 0 (gauss_error NaN) - VlasovMaxwellCoupling: option kappa (displacement current) renamed to lam (with coefficient lam^2); defaults lam = eps lam_s, c2 = kappa_s^2 eps, c3 = 1/eps, i.e. lam_s, kappa_s^2, 1 for the cyclotron and 1, alpha^2/eps, 1/eps for the light velocity scale; energies() parts - docs: lam and kappa under Equation parameters; cyclotron velocity without the spurious 2 pi; models/AGENTS.md: doc_normalization directly below doc_pde - example, verification test (gamma unchanged, 0.02770) and tests with lam, kappa Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…sign of lam, AGENTS.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…e paragraph under Equation parameters, fix the energy reference in VlasovMaxwellCoupling The :meth: reference to VlasovMaxwellCoupling.energy was inside a math block (not rendered); moved into the text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
spossann
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2026
…rs lam and kappa; safeguard the parallel force - Model DriftKineticMaxwell: velocity scale "thermal" (as DriftKineticElectrostaticAdiabatic), default BaseUnits(kBT=1.0) (also in the generated default parameter file), constructor overrides epsilon, lam, kappa; Ampere's law eps^2 lam^2 dE/dt + eps^2 kappa^2 n0/|B0|^2 dE_perp/dt = curl B - eps kappa^2 J_gc; doc_pde with doc_normalization below it (thermal scale only); scalars en_E, en_B, en_f from the parts of the conserved energy. - DriftKineticMaxwellCoupling: option kappa (displacement current) renamed to lam (coefficient lam^2), defaults lam = eps lam_s, chi = (eps kappa_s)^2, c2 = kappa_s^2 eps, c3 = 1/eps (#821 equation parameters); energies(); the internal E x B scaling of the assembled matrix renamed to skew (also in the dk_maxwell kernel). - The parallel electric force b* . E / eps is applied only by the coupling step: the model asserts that push_para gets no potential and no electric field, doc_discretization lists which propagator applies each term, and a test checks that push_para leaves v_par unchanged for E != 0 (and changes it when given E). - Tests, verification test and example in the new parameters (eps = 0.5, lam = 2, kappa = 6 give the same coefficients as before; same frequencies). Raw docstrings for the pusher constructors (LaTeX). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
spossann
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2026
… Maxwell step with polarization and quasi-neutral limit; model DriftKineticMaxwell (#823) **Model docs (preview):** https://struphy-hub.github.io/docs-preview/pr-823/sections/subsections/models-all.html#struphy.models.DriftKineticMaxwell The drift-kinetic counterpart of `VlasovMaxwellCoupling` / `VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral` (#821, merged). ## What - **New propagator `DriftKineticMaxwellCoupling`**: Maxwell's equations, the parallel acceleration of the guiding centers ($\dot v_\parallel = \frac1\varepsilon \mathbf b^* \cdot\mathbf E$) and, as an option, the $E\times B$ current in one Crank–Nicolson step at frozen positions. Gauge-invariant formulation: the guiding-center current $\int f^{\rm vol}\dot{\mathbf X}$ with $\mathbf E^* = \mathbf E - \varepsilon\mu\nabla|B_0|$, not $-\nabla\phi$. The Schur system for $\mathbf e^{\rm mid}$: $$\Big(\mathbb M_E + \tfrac{\Delta t^2}{4}(c_1\mathbb C^\top\mathbb M_2\mathbb C + c_2c_3\mathbb A_\parallel) + \tfrac{\Delta t}{2}c_2\mathbb S\Big)\mathbf e^{\rm mid} = \dots,\qquad \mathbb M_E = \lambda^2\mathbb M_1 + \chi\mathbb M_1^{\rm gyro}$$ - $\mathbb A_\parallel$ (rank one per marker) is the parallel response. $\mathbb S$ (antisymmetric) is the $E\times B$ current. - Energy is conserved exactly in any geometry. - The particle matrices are assembled (`dk_maxwell`) or matrix-free (`dk_maxwell_mf` with the existing rank-1/antisymmetric `MarkerOperator` kernels). - Preconditioner: `StiffnessPreconditioner`. Initial projection for $\lambda = 0$, as in #821. - **Polarization term** $\chi\,\frac{n_0}{|B_0|^2}\partial_t\mathbf E_\perp$, using the existing `M1gyro`. It is needed because the drift-kinetic ordering removes the polarization drift. Without it the quasi-neutral limit $\lambda = 0$ is singular for flute modes ($k_\parallel = 0$), and with only the displacement current the shear Alfvén wave travels at the speed of light. With it, $\lambda = 0$ gives the inertial Alfvén wave. `lam**2 + chi > 0` is asserted. - **`PushGuidingCenterBxEstar` / `PushGuidingCenterParallel`** accept either `phi` (the existing path, unchanged) or a new `e_field` (Hcurl), with $\mathbf E^* = \mathbf E - \varepsilon\mu\nabla|B|$. The existing kernels already read the E field. - With `e_field` only the explicit algorithm is consistent: the discrete gradients conserve a Hamiltonian with a potential, and without one they would remove the work of E along the step. - A discrete-gradient `algo` therefore falls back to `explicit` with a warning, so the default options keep working. - **New model `DriftKineticMaxwell`**, splitting `coupling` → `push_para` → `push_bxe(e_field)`, and the example `inertial_alfven_wave`. - Normalized with the **ion thermal velocity**, as `DriftKineticElectrostaticAdiabatic`, using the equation parameters $\varepsilon$, $\lambda$, $\kappa$ of #821. Ampère's law becomes $$\varepsilon^2\lambda^2\,\partial_t\mathbf E + \varepsilon^2\kappa^2\,\tfrac{n_0}{|B_0|^2}\,\partial_t\mathbf E_\perp = \nabla\times\tilde{\mathbf B} - \varepsilon\kappa^2\,\mathbf J_{gc},$$ and the parallel force has the coefficient $1/\varepsilon$. - Propagator option `lam` (coefficient $\lambda^2$ of the displacement current; 0 is the quasi-neutral limit). Its defaults are $\varepsilon\lambda_s$, $\chi = (\varepsilon\kappa_s)^2$, $c_2 = \kappa_s^2\varepsilon$, $c_3 = 1/\varepsilon$. - For deuterium, 1 m, 5 T, $10^{20}$ m$^{-3}$, 10 keV: $\varepsilon^2\lambda^2 = 5\cdot10^{-6}$, $\varepsilon^2\kappa^2 = 8\cdot10^{-3}$, $\varepsilon\kappa^2 = 2.8$. - The constructor takes `epsilon`, `lam` and `kappa` as overrides. The default is `BaseUnits(kBT=1.0)`, also in the generated params file. - **The parallel force $\frac1\varepsilon\mathbf b^*\cdot\mathbf E$ is applied only by the coupling step.** - The model gives `push_para` no `phi` and no `e_field`, and asserts this. - `doc_discretization` lists which propagator applies each term. - A test checks that `push_para` leaves $v_\parallel$ unchanged under $\mathbf E \neq 0$, and changes it when given $\mathbf E$. - The coupling propagator has no CUDA kernels yet (asserted). Analysis note with the derivations (dispersion relation, well-posedness, energy across the splitting): `notes/drift_kinetic_maxwell.md` (local, not in the repo). ## Energy across the splitting The coupling step conserves energy exactly. The full splitting does so only when $\nabla|B_0| = 0$ and either $\mu = 0$ or $\tilde B_\parallel = 0$. Two pieces are missing: - the grad-$B$ drift current, which pairs with the $E\times B$ motion of the positions (nonlinear); - the magnetization current, which pairs with $\mu\nabla\tilde B_\parallel$ in the pushers. Both are follow-ups. ## Tests Separate review agents went over the branch before each push. The one real finding (discrete gradients with `e_field`) is fixed in the second commit; the review of the normalization commit found no bugs. - `test_drift_kinetic_maxwell_coupling.py` (1 and 4 ranks): - energy conserved to $10^{-10}$ of the exchanged energy, for $\lambda = 1, 0$, with and without $E\times B$, assembled and matrix-free, and in a Colella mapping; - assembled results equal matrix-free results; - $\mathbb A_\parallel$ is symmetric PSD and $\mathbb S$ antisymmetric; - the discrete equations hold; - the initial projection removes the period-2 oscillation; - dt change; invalid options. - `test_push_guiding_center_e_field.py`: `e_field = -grad phi` reproduces the `phi` path exactly, for both pushers, also with the default (discrete-gradient) `algo` through the fallback. - `test_verif_DriftKineticMaxwell.py`: frequency of the cold-slab shear mode against the roots of the dispersion determinant: | case | measured | analytic | |---|---|---| | $\lambda = 0$ | 0.3579 | 0.3616 | | $\lambda = 0$ with $E\times B$ | 0.2637 | 0.2643 | | $\lambda = 1$ | 0.3405 | 0.3428 | The deviations are marker noise (−0.35 % with 4× more markers). Energy over the whole splitting is conserved to $10^{-9}$. - Generic model test, example test run, kernel catalog counts bumped. Regression: the generic tests of `DriftKineticElectrostaticAdiabatic`, `GuidingCenter`, `ToyDrift`, `LinearMHDDriftkineticCC` and `test_current_coupling_5d.py` pass. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up of #819 (merged); based on
devel.Normalization (latest change)
VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutraluses the cyclotron velocity scale (with no coefficients in the Vlasov equation and Faraday's law; the quasi-neutral limit is$\hat\Omega_p \hat t$ before, unused; in the light scale both definitions agree.) For a general velocity scale the coefficients are $\varepsilon^2\lambda^2$ , $\kappa^2\varepsilon$ , $1/\varepsilon$ and Gauss $\kappa^2/(\varepsilon\lambda^2) = \alpha^2/\varepsilon$ ; they reduce to $1, \alpha^2/\varepsilon, 1/\varepsilon$ for the light scale. Documented under Equation parameters in $2\pi$ in the cyclotron velocity, removed).
lam=0. (kappawasmodels-normalization.rst(which also had a spuriousdoc_normalizationis now directly belowdoc_pde(rule added tomodels/AGENTS.md).Consequences in this PR: the propagator option$\lambda^2$ ), defaults $\lambda = \varepsilon\lambda_s$ , $c_2 = \kappa_s^2\varepsilon$ , $c_3 = 1/\varepsilon$ ; the model's scalars $\lambda^2 \nabla\cdot\mathbf E = c_2 \rho$ of the coupling step and is skipped for $\lambda = 0$ (
kappa(displacement current) is renamedlam(coefficienten_E,en_B,en_fare the parts of the conserved energy anden_totis the conserved energy (en_Hremoved); the initial Poisson solve uses Gauss' lawgauss_errorNaN). Example and verification test uselam,kappa=1,epsilon=-1, which are the old equations: the verification growth rate is unchanged (0.02770). Signed cyclotron units for a negative bulk charge: issue #825.The sections below describe the propagator in its own coefficients; where they say$\lambda^2$ ), and
kappafor the displacement-current coefficient, readlam(withen_His nowen_tot.Summary
New propagator
VlasovMaxwellCoupling: the steps ofMaxwellWeakAmpereandVlasovAmpereCouplingin one implicit Crank–Nicolson step, for(marker positions fixed), with options$\alpha^2/\varepsilon$ , $1/\varepsilon$ of the species). $\kappa = 0$ drops the displacement current (quasi-neutral limit, $c_1 \nabla\times\mathbf B = c_2 \mathbf J$ ).
kappa(default 1),c1(default 1),c2,c3(defaultvlasov_maxwellkernel. Thenenergy()), for full-f weights.StiffnessPreconditioner(mass_ops, "curl", sigma=kappa + dt^2 c2 c3 n_ref/4, mid=dt^2 c1/4 M2, stab="M1"), built inprepare_time_stepand rebuilt when dt changes (as in MaxwellWeakAmpere: StiffnessPreconditioner as default; document the discretization of MaxwellWeakAmpere and VlasovAmpereCoupling #819). The stabilization stays positive atn_refdefaults to the density averagematrix_free(default False), as in the other 6D couplings of Matrix-free particle matrices (MarkerOperator) in the 6D coupling propagators #817: the particle matrix in the Schur operator is aMarkerOperator(vlasov_maxwell_mf+marker_operator_symm_dot), with the fillingsinitial_projection, default True): the constraint holds only at the mid-point, so its residualprepare_time_step, before the initial data are saved; not for a restored restart state),New model
VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral: subclass ofVlasovMaxwellOneSpecieswith the splittingcoupling→push_eta→push_vxband the extra scalaren_H.VlasovMaxwellOneSpeciesgot a_link_propagator_variableshook and a default-params hook that keys on the last propagator and the class name (output forVlasovMaxwellOneSpeciesunchanged).Verification test
models/tests/verification/test_verif_VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral.py: Weibel instability at κ = 0 (1e5 full-f markers withsobol_antitheticloading, dt = 1, t = 160); the growth rate fitted to en_B for 80 < t < 150 must be within 7 % of the analytical 0.02784. Fitted: 0.02770 / 0.02784 / 0.02782 on 1 / 2 / 4 ranks (~45 s serial, ~20–27 s on 2 or 4 ranks). With pseudo-random markers the fit is noise-limited (about 10 % low, ~7 % seed-to-seed scatter), hence the antithetic Sobol loading.Example
examples/VlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutral/weibel_quasi_neutral(--kappa 1|0, dt = 1, i.e. 20× the dt of theVlasovMaxwellOneSpeciesWeibel example).Results
PCG iterations of one step (8×4×1 cells, p = (2,2,1), 1280 full-f markers, tol 1e-13; energy error ≤ 3e-16 relative in every case):
Weibel example with
sobol_antitheticloading (current version; 10⁵ full-f markers, 32 cells, t = 400, serial, ~2 min per run): γ = 0.02805 for κ = 1 and 0.02758 for κ = 0 (analytical 0.02784), max rel. change ofen_H2e-9 / 6e-9.Earlier runs with pseudo-random markers:
en_HThe first three κ = 0 rows are without the initial projection (it was added later): there en_B shows a period-2 oscillation band (≈ 2e-7) for t < 80, which the projection removes (smooth en_B from t = 0, en_E 10–20× lower).
Analytical γ = 0.02784 for both κ (κγ² ≈ 8e-4 ≪ k² + 1). With pseudo-random markers the fitted rates were 10 % low, hardly dependent on dt: marker noise, removed by the antithetic Sobol loading above.
Known limitations / follow-ups
Existing code, found in review: with clones,
sobol_standard/sobol_antitheticloadings have no clone offset in the Sobol index, so all clones draw the same markers (effective sample Np / nclones). Not used by the tests here; follow-up issue.Strict quasi-neutrality is not enforced over the full split step: the coupling step makes$\mathbf J(\mathbf V^{\mathrm{mid}})$ divergence-free at frozen positions, but $\mathbf V^{n+1}$ .
PushEtathen moves the markers withPolar splines not supported (tensor-product V1 buffers;
VlasovAmpereCouplinghas the same limitation).With the control variate (κ > 0 only) the energy is not exactly conserved and
n_reffalls back to 1.Tests run locally
(Updated after the matrix-free option and the initial projection. The branch has
develmerged via #819, which also gotdevelmerged, so the diff here is only this PR.)test_vlasov_maxwell_coupling.py+test_matrix_free_6d.py: serial 40 passed,mpirun -n 439 passed + 1 mpi_skip. New: matrix-free vs assembled steps (Colella, κ = 1 and 0, incl.n_ref), discrete equations with both variants,test_initial_projection(sign flip of r without; r = 0, dt independence, e unchanged and stationary steps with the projection).test_maxwell_weak_ampere.pyon the merged state: serial and 2 ranks.Earlier (first version):
src/struphy/propagators/tests/test_vlasov_maxwell_coupling.py: serial (15 passed) andmpirun -n 4(14 passed, 1 mpi_skip): exact energy conservation (κ = 1, 0; both preconditioners; species and explicit c1 ≠ |c2| ≠ |c3|), residual of the discrete CN Ampère and Faraday laws (with the pushed V), weakly divergence-free mid-point current at κ = 0, O(dt²) agreement withMaxwellWeakAmpere+VlasovAmpereCoupling, linear convergence in κ with bounded iterations, rebuild on dt change, option validation, control-variate rejection. A mutation check (pusher constant c2 instead of c3) makes 6 of these fail.-m singleforVlasovMaxwellQuasiNeutralandVlasovMaxwellOneSpecies(serial and 4 ranks);test_examples.pyfor the new example;doc/check_models_doc.py,doc/check_propagator_doc.py; ruff.🤖 Generated with Claude Code