Skip to content

merge queue: embarking epbs (f473aa5) and #1047 together - #1055

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
epbsfrom
mergify/merge-queue/f0bc0c06e4
Closed

mergify[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
epbsfrom
mergify/merge-queue/f0bc0c06e4

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented May 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch epbs (f473aa5) and #1047 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #1047.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule default for merge:

  • check-success=test-suite-success

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: f473aa5d4f6e3d3717767c67982cf54b889e484e
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 1047
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

shane-moore and others added 3 commits May 20, 2026 18:24
- Add /// docs to struct, all three fields, and the validation error variant
- Pin validator doc-comment to ssvlabs/SIPs §3 at commit 7e8b5bd; name the
  do_validation -> Result extension point if the SIP flips on local-view
  equality for payload-status flags
- Narrow status-flag disagreement test: hold beacon_block_root constant, flip
  only payload-status booleans; root-mismatch behavior intentionally not pinned
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Your PR title doesn't follow the Conventional Commit guidelines.

Example of valid titles:

  • feat: add new user login
  • fix: correct button size
  • docs: update README

Usage:

  • feat: Introduces a new feature
  • fix: Patches a bug
  • chore: General maintenance tasks or updates
  • test: Adding new tests or modifying existing tests
  • perf: Performance improvements
  • refactor: Changes to improve code structure
  • docs: Documentation updates
  • ci: Changes to CI/CD configurations
  • revert: Reverts a previously merged PR

Breaking Changes

Breaking changes are noted by using an exclamation mark. For example:

  • feat!: changed the API
  • chore(node)!: Removed unused public function

Help

For more information, follow the guidelines here: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (epbs@f473aa5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
anchor/common/ssv_types/src/consensus.rs 95.83% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             epbs    #1055   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   62.03%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      156           
  Lines           ?    26237           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    16277           
  Misses          ?     9960           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 62.03% <95.83%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mergify mergify Bot closed this May 22, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/f0bc0c06e4 branch May 22, 2026 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants