[MISC] Allow recursive subcommands#233
Conversation
|
What does this do to the CWL export? |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #233 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.10% 95.12% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 1735 1742 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 1650 1657 +7
Misses 85 85 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
CTD looks ok, CWL has a duplicate base command? Click to open |
0aed6de to
9e3821e
Compare
9e3821e to
fc26a68
Compare
fc26a68 to
8a33945
Compare
3c18364 to
fc4c414
Compare
mr-c
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd like to see a test to confirm sane CWL output
e9b5684 to
37f9117
Compare
This'll need
|
37f9117 to
1f64772
Compare
|
Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/sharg-parser/233 |
1f64772 to
2d1779b
Compare
2d1779b to
ef1d6f5
Compare
SGSSGene
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Looks good to me!
After
I kinda forgot about this one :)