Materialize a Kafka topic into an in-memory, compacted dict — a GlobalKTable for asyncio Python.
Every process that opens a KafkaTable replays the topic from the beginning
into a local read-only mapping, then keeps consuming for live updates; a
KafkaTableWriter maintains the topic with keyed upserts and tombstones.
Built for small, broadly-needed reference data — service registries,
capability advertisements, feature flags, config maps — not for large or
high-churn state.
Kafka Streams (JVM) has two table abstractions over changelog topics: the
partition-sharded KTable, where each application instance holds a slice of
the keys, and GlobalKTable, where every instance bootstraps and maintains a
full local copy — the right shape for lookup data that any instance may need
at any moment. The Python ecosystem has several maintained stream-processing
frameworks, but all of them implement only the sharded shape, with
framework-owned changelog topics and their own process runtimes. ktables fills
the gap with just the global-table piece, as a plain asyncio library over
aiokafka: your topic, your message format, your event loop.
The Kafka semantics the implementation relies on (group-less consumers,
catch-up gating against end offsets, compaction independence) are documented,
with provenance, in the module docstring of
kafka_table.py.
pip install ktablesRequires Python 3.10+. Pydantic is not required — the .json() presets
accept any class with pydantic-v2's JSON methods.
Maintain a registry from one service:
from ktables import KafkaTableWriter
writer = KafkaTableWriter.json(
bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", topic="my.registry", model=ServiceRecord
)
async with writer:
await writer.set("billing", record) # upsert (broker-acked)
...
await writer.delete("billing") # tombstone: removes the keyConsume it from any other process:
from ktables import KafkaTable
table = KafkaTable.json(
bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", topic="my.registry", model=ServiceRecord
)
async with table: # replays the topic; returns once caught up
record = table.get("billing")
if table.status != "caught_up": # "degraded": catch-up timed out
...Non-pydantic payloads: construct directly with your own codecs —
KafkaTable(..., value_decoder=bytes_to_value) /
KafkaTableWriter(..., value_encoder=value_to_bytes).
A grouped table is a nested {group: {member: value}} view over a single
compacted topic, where each (group, member) pair is its own compaction key.
It is the race-free way to model a multi-writer registry: many independent
processes each announce their own entry under a shared group, with no
read-modify-write and no lost updates (every writer owns its own key). The
"collection per group" is reconstructed in memory on read.
from ktables import GroupedKafkaTable, GroupedKafkaTableWriter
# Each process announces its own member under a shared group:
async with GroupedKafkaTableWriter.json(
bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", topic="services", model=ServiceRecord
) as writer:
await writer.set("billing", "host-a", record) # upsert one member
...
await writer.delete("billing", "host-a") # tombstone one member
# Any reader sees the whole group:
async with GroupedKafkaTable.json(
bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", topic="services", model=ServiceRecord
) as table:
if await table.barrier(): # read-your-own-writes, on demand
table.get_member("billing", "host-a") # one member — O(1)
table.members("billing") # {member: value} map — O(group)
table.groups() # all group ids
table.snapshot() # whole nested view — one O(N) passReads are O(output). To iterate every group use snapshot() — not
for g in table.groups(): table.members(g), which re-scans per group.
Use a dedicated topic. The composite-key codec is injective, but it cannot distinguish your keys from a third party's identically-shaped keys on a shared topic (a foreign key matching the scheme would be read as a real member). Give a grouped table its own topic.
There is deliberately no delete_on_close option (shutdown-time deletion is
application policy, and no library can promise it on a crash). Compose it:
async with writer:
await writer.set(my_key, my_record)
try:
... # serve
finally:
await writer.delete(my_key) # acked before the producer stopsBoth classes ensure their topic exists at start (idempotent create,
compacted). If the application lacks topic-create ACLs, pass
ensure_topic=False and create the topic out-of-band (the module-level
ensure_topic() function is the deploy-time primitive).
KafkaTable is eventually consistent. Precisely:
- When
start()/async withreturns, contents are complete as of the topic's end offsets at start time — unlessstatus == "degraded"(catch-up timed out; data may be partial). - Thereafter, updates appear within milliseconds of the broker write — but
there is no read-your-own-writes: after
await writer.set(k, v), a table in the same process may briefly still return the old value. - Contents are stable between your awaits (single event loop; only the
reader task mutates). Use
snapshot()for a copy held across awaits. - Correctness does not depend on broker-side compaction: last-write-wins over the full log yields the same dict; compaction only bounds replay time.
When you need guarantee #2 now — e.g. you just published a record and must
read it back consistently — await table.barrier() closes the gap:
await writer.set("billing", record)
if await table.barrier(): # waits until the table has caught up
record = table["billing"] # guaranteed visiblebarrier() snapshots the topic's end offsets at call time and returns once the
reader has consumed and applied every record below them (on the partitions
assigned at the call), so every write acked before the call is then visible. It
returns a bool, never raising for environmental conditions: True once fresh;
False on timeout (bounds the whole call), reader death, stop() racing the
wait, or a broker error while snapshotting. It raises RuntimeError only on
lifecycle misuse (table never started, or already stopped). Runtime partition
expansion is out of scope — the guarantee covers the call-time assignment.
Barrier latency. On a table that is actively consuming, barrier() resolves
in ~1 ms. On a quiet table it is slower — its latency is approximately
max(fetch_max_wait_ms, poll_timeout_ms): the end-offset snapshot waits behind the
consumer's in-flight fetch long-poll (fetch_max_wait_ms, default 500 ms) and the
reader then resolves it on its next poll (poll_timeout_ms, default 200 ms). To
minimize barrier latency on quiet tables, lower both knobs (e.g.
fetch_max_wait_ms=10, poll_timeout_ms=20 takes the idle barrier from ~500 ms to
~30 ms) — at the cost of more frequent fetches and reader wake-ups (broker traffic
and CPU). Leave the defaults unless fast read-your-own-writes on idle tables matters.
A tombstone is a record with a null value (b"" is data, not a tombstone).
If the background reader dies (non-retriable error, e.g. authorization),
contents freeze at the last applied state: status becomes "failed" and
failure holds the exception — gate liveness decisions on status, never on
reads alone. Transient broker outages do not kill the reader; it resumes.
The complete API reference — every class, method, and module-level export —
lives in docs/API.md: KafkaTable / KafkaTableWriter, the
grouped GroupedKafkaTable / GroupedKafkaTableWriter, the composite-key codec,
and the module-level helpers (ensure_topic, ViewStats, SupportsJsonModel,
TableStatus, DEFAULT_TOPIC_CONFIGS).
ktables adds negligible latency over the raw Kafka client — propagation (publish to
read) and write latency (publish to ack) are within measurement noise of bare
aiokafka, and reads are in-memory dict operations. The one tunable cost is barrier() on a quiet table; see the
Consistency contract for the
max(fetch_max_wait_ms, poll_timeout_ms) barrier-latency model.
For measured numbers and perf tuning:
- Performance report — propagation,
barrier(), write latency/throughput, catch-up, memory, and reader-CPU results, the raw-Kafka baseline delta, run-to-run stability, and tuning guidance. - Benchmark suite — how to run it (profiles, the testcontainers Redpanda broker) and reproduce the numbers.
Questions and bug reports are welcome as issues, and PRs are accepted. The repo is developed with uv; please run the test suite before submitting:
uv run pytest testsThe integration tests spin up a Redpanda broker automatically via
testcontainers (Docker required). Run only the
broker-free unit suite with uv run pytest -m "not integration".