Draft
Conversation
MarijnS95
force-pushed
the
surface-control
branch
from
d6451aa to
b0523ef
Compare
|
Is there any updates on this? :) I just made a mistake while hand-writing a binding to ASurfaceTransaction_setGeometry |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft to ensure visibility into the impending addition of these bindings. This first requires a few pre-PRs to update the NDK version
ndk-syswas generated from (which now contains header fixes that make us able to parsesurface_control.has valid C), together with also immediately binding the new API made available in such updates.