Rename some more of our internal #[rustc_*] TEST attributes#155027
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 6 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Apr 10, 2026
Merged
Rename some more of our internal #[rustc_*] TEST attributes#155027rust-bors[bot] merged 6 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
#[rustc_*] TEST attributes#155027rust-bors[bot] merged 6 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes. Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs cc @jdonszelmann, @JonathanBrouwer Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing cc @jdonszelmann, @JonathanBrouwer Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_hir/src/attrs cc @jdonszelmann, @JonathanBrouwer These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
rustbot
added
A-rustc-dev-guide
fmease
changed the title
#[rustc_*] TEST attributes
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
fmease
force-pushed
the
more-test-attr-renamings
branch
from
2bef913 to
48fb841
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Moreover, dereference `ty_layout.align` for `#[rustc_dump_layout(align)]`
to render `align: Align($N bytes)` instead of `align: AbiAlign { abi: Align($N bytes) }`
which contains the same amount of information but it more concise and legible.
JonathanBrouwer
force-pushed
the
more-test-attr-renamings
branch
from
48fb841 to
64b4284
Compare
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
Contributor
|
Rebased. |
Contributor
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2026
…=JonathanBrouwer Rename some more of our internal `#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes Follow-up to rust-lang#153300. r? JonathanBrouwer or jdonszelmann
This was referenced Apr 10, 2026
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #155047 (Always exhaustively match on typing mode) - #155080 (Simplify `try_load_from_disk_fn`.) - #152384 (Restrict EII declarations to functions at lowering time) - #153796 (Fix ICE when combining #[eii] with #[core::contracts::ensures]) - #154369 (Fix `pattern_from_macro_note` for bit-or expr) - #155027 ( Rename some more of our internal `#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes) - #155031 (delegation: fix unelided lifetime ICE, refactoring of GenericArgPosition) - #155040 (Fix code block whitespace handling in Markdown)
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#155047 (Always exhaustively match on typing mode) - rust-lang/rust#155080 (Simplify `try_load_from_disk_fn`.) - rust-lang/rust#152384 (Restrict EII declarations to functions at lowering time) - rust-lang/rust#153796 (Fix ICE when combining #[eii] with #[core::contracts::ensures]) - rust-lang/rust#154369 (Fix `pattern_from_macro_note` for bit-or expr) - rust-lang/rust#155027 ( Rename some more of our internal `#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes) - rust-lang/rust#155031 (delegation: fix unelided lifetime ICE, refactoring of GenericArgPosition) - rust-lang/rust#155040 (Fix code block whitespace handling in Markdown)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #153300.
r? JonathanBrouwer or jdonszelmann