docs(boundary): document SpikeStream vs kinetic-signals (LIM-214) by rmems · Pull Request #24 · rmems/SpikeStream.jl

rmems · 2026-07-22T09:21:09Z

Summary

Documents the post-PR #22 package boundary between SpikeStream.jl and kinetic-signals so agents and humans do not reintroduce dual math or invent FFI prematurely.

README Package Boundary ownership table + integration notes
AGENTS.md matching sibling/boundary bullets
.worktrees/ gitignore entry

Linear / GitHub

Linear: LIM-214
Closes docs: document SpikeStream vs kinetic-signals boundary (no FFI required) #14

Test plan

julia --project=. -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.instantiate(); Pkg.test()' (32 tests before LIM-41 fixtures)
Spec + code quality subagent reviews passed
No public API changes

Minor polish from code quality review of LIM-214.

linear-code · 2026-07-22T09:21:12Z

LIM-214

coderabbitai · 2026-07-22T09:21:39Z

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 38 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a595ba8d-fe79-4659-8577-a07ae121cbad

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8460669 and 779261c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

AGENTS.md
README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Changes

Package Boundary Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Package ownership and integration guidance `README.md`, `AGENTS.md`	Documents SpikeStream.jl’s spike-stream API scope, kinetic-signals ownership, removed transitional functions, and the current no-FFI and fixture boundaries.

Local Worktree Isolation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Ignore local worktrees `.gitignore`	Adds `.worktrees/` to Git’s ignore rules for local worktree state.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related issues

Limen-Neural/SpikeStream.jl#5 — Relates to documenting package ownership and the separation of SpikeStream.jl fixtures from Rust-only shared vectors.

Possibly related PRs

Limen-Neural/SpikeStream.jl#20 — Also updates AGENTS.md, providing a direct documentation-level connection.

Suggested labels: documentation

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check	⚠️ Warning	The `.gitignore` .worktrees/ entry is unrelated to `#14`'s documentation boundary requirements.	Move the .gitignore update to a separate PR or expand the issue scope to cover it.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	Clear and specific: it identifies the docs-focused boundary update between SpikeStream and kinetic-signals.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description matches the actual changes and mentions the README, AGENTS.md, and .gitignore updates.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The README and AGENTS.md boundary docs satisfy `#14`, and no FFI implementation was added.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing Touches

✨ Simplify code

Create PR with simplified code
Commit simplified code in branch docs/kinetic-signals-boundary

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

amazon-q-developer

This PR successfully documents the package boundary between SpikeStream.jl and kinetic-signals. The documentation changes are clear, well-structured, and consistent across README.md and AGENTS.md. The addition of .worktrees/ to .gitignore is appropriate for developers using git worktrees. No blocking issues identified.

You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

codacy-production · 2026-07-22T09:22:00Z

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer}
_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

devin-ai-integration

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

kilo-code-bot · 2026-07-22T09:25:42Z

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (3 files)

.gitignore
AGENTS.md
README.md

Previous Review Summary (commit 8460669)

Current summary above is authoritative. Previous snapshots are kept for context only.

Previous review (commit `8460669`)

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (3 files)

.gitignore
AGENTS.md
README.md

Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud

_{Reviewed by gemini-3.6-flash · Input: 53.6K · Output: 4.4K · Cached: 72.3K}

_{Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch main}

Address CodeRabbit/Codacy review on LIM-214: define acronyms on first use and promote Integration to a markdown subheading.

gitar-bot · 2026-07-22T11:47:07Z

Important

You are using the Gitar free plan. Upgrade to unlock code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more.

_Gitar

codecov · 2026-07-22T16:06:08Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Add test/fixtures/spike_vectors.json with golden vectors, load/assert in runtests.jl, JSON as test-only dep. Retargeted onto main after #24 merge. Fixes Codacy CHANGELOG blank-line density and documents burst defaults.

…1) (#25) * test(fixtures): frozen spike feature fixtures and range checks (LIM-41) Add test/fixtures/spike_vectors.json with golden vectors, load/assert in runtests.jl, JSON as test-only dep. Retargeted onto main after #24 merge. Fixes Codacy CHANGELOG blank-line density and documents burst defaults. * docs: expand GBM acronym in README boundary table

rmems added 2 commits July 22, 2026 04:11

docs(boundary): document SpikeStream vs kinetic-signals (LIM-214)

0f809b5

docs(boundary): title-case heading and bump AGENTS date

8460669

Minor polish from code quality review of LIM-214.

amazon-q-developer Bot reviewed Jul 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

devin-ai-integration Bot reviewed Jul 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

coderabbitai Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 22, 2026

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

rmems added 2 commits July 22, 2026 04:34

docs(boundary): expand GBM/FFI and use Integration heading

fa563e2

Address CodeRabbit/Codacy review on LIM-214: define acronyms on first use and promote Integration to a markdown subheading.

docs(agents): define LIM acronym on first use for Codacy

779261c

rmems merged commit 37ce0bc into main Jul 22, 2026
9 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

docs(boundary): document SpikeStream vs kinetic-signals (LIM-214) - #24

docs(boundary): document SpikeStream vs kinetic-signals (LIM-214)#24
rmems merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/kinetic-signals-boundary

rmems commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited by devin-ai-integration Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

linear-code Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Review limit reached

Walkthrough

Changes

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Uh oh!

amazon-q-developer Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

Uh oh!

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Previous review (commit `8460669`)

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gitar-bot Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

rmems commented Jul 22, 2026 • edited by devin-ai-integration Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Linear / GitHub

Test plan

Uh oh!

linear-code Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review limit reached

Walkthrough

Changes

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Uh oh!

amazon-q-developer Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Up to standards ✅

Uh oh!

devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

Uh oh!

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code Review Summary

Previous review (commit 8460669)

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gitar-bot Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

rmems commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited by devin-ai-integration Bot

Loading

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jul 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Previous review (commit `8460669`)