Skip to content

feat: Add Silero VAD v6 model support #257

Open
satoren wants to merge 3 commits intoricky0123:masterfrom
satoren:v6
Open

feat: Add Silero VAD v6 model support #257
satoren wants to merge 3 commits intoricky0123:masterfrom
satoren:v6

Conversation

@satoren
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@satoren satoren commented Jan 6, 2026

Description of changes

  • Add SileroV6 class with context handling (64 samples for 16kHz)
  • Fix frame size: v6 uses 512 samples like v5 (not 1536 like legacy)
  • V6 model requires context to be prepended to each audio frame
  • Update real-time-vad.ts to use correct frame size for v6
  • Add silero_vad_v6.onnx model file (copied from Silero VAD v6.2.0)

fix #228

Checklist

  • Verified that the typechecking & formatting Github actions passes successfully
  • Verified that changes work on the test site, adding changes to the test site if necessary to try out your changes

- Add SileroV6 class with context handling (64 samples for 16kHz)
- Fix frame size: v6 uses 512 samples like v5 (not 1536 like legacy)
- V6 model requires context to be prepended to each audio frame
- Update real-time-vad.ts to use correct frame size for v6
- Add silero_vad_v6.onnx model file (copied from Silero VAD v6.2.0)
- Update browser.md with v6 model file references
- Update api.md with v6 model option and file references
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@satoren is attempting to deploy a commit to the rrxz's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@satoren satoren marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 01:26
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Jan 11, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
vad_test_site Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 11, 2026 11:09am

@ricky0123
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Nice!! This will be a great addition, although I may not have time to review until next weekend. Thanks!!

@paulers
Copy link
Copy Markdown

paulers commented Feb 17, 2026

Hi, just wondering how we're looking on that review? I took a glance at the incoming code, seems pretty uncontroversial. Think we could see it merged in sometime in the next couple weeks? Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feat: Support V6

3 participants